Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
      • JNMT Supplement
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Watch or Listen to JNMT Podcast
  • Visit SNMMI on Facebook
  • Join SNMMI on LinkedIn
  • Follow SNMMI on Twitter
  • Subscribe to JNMT RSS feeds
Review ArticleContinuing Education

The Role of 18F-Sodium Fluoride PET/CT Bone Scans in the Diagnosis of Metastatic Bone Disease from Breast and Prostate Cancer

Randeep Kumar Kulshrestha, Sobhan Vinjamuri, Andrew England, Julie Nightingale and Peter Hogg
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology December 2016, 44 (4) 217-222; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.116.176859
Randeep Kumar Kulshrestha
1Queensland X-Ray, Cairns Private Hospital, Cairns, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sobhan Vinjamuri
2Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew England
3School of Health Sciences, University of Salford, Salford, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Julie Nightingale
3School of Health Sciences, University of Salford, Salford, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Hogg
3School of Health Sciences, University of Salford, Salford, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Information

vol. 44 no. 4 217-222
DOI 
https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.116.176859
PubMed 
27634981

Published By 
Society of Nuclear Medicine
Print ISSN 
0091-4916
Online ISSN 
1535-5675
History 
  • Received for publication May 22, 2016
  • Accepted for publication August 15, 2016
  • Published online December 5, 2016.

Article Versions

  • previous version (September 15, 2016 - 05:40).
  • You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Copyright & Usage 
© 2016 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.

Author Information

  1. Randeep Kumar Kulshrestha1,
  2. Sobhan Vinjamuri2,
  3. Andrew England3,
  4. Julie Nightingale3 and
  5. Peter Hogg3
  1. 1Queensland X-Ray, Cairns Private Hospital, Cairns, Australia
  2. 2Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom; and
  3. 3School of Health Sciences, University of Salford, Salford, United Kingdom
  1. For correspondence or reprints contact: Randeep Kumar Kulshrestha, Queensland X-Ray, Cairns Private Hospital, 144 Lake St., Cairns, North Queensland, 4870, Australia. E-mail: rkul22{at}gmail.com
View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Cited By...

  • 47 Citations
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • 18F-NaF-PET/CT for the detection of bone metastasis in prostate cancer: a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies
    Sara Sheikhbahaei, Krystyna M. Jones, Rudolf A. Werner, Roberto A. Salas-Fragomeni, Charles V. Marcus, Takahiro Higuchi, Steven P. Rowe, Lilja B. Solnes, Mehrbod S. Javadi
    Annals of Nuclear Medicine 2019 33 5
  • 18F-Sodium Fluoride PET as a Diagnostic Modality for Metabolic, Autoimmune, and Osteogenic Bone Disorders: Cellular Mechanisms and Clinical Applications
    Peter Sang Uk Park, William Y. Raynor, Yusha Sun, Thomas J. Werner, Chamith S. Rajapakse, Abass Alavi
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2021 22 12
  • ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Cervical Neck Pain or Cervical Radiculopathy
    Marin A. McDonald, Claudia F.E. Kirsch, Beejal Y. Amin, Joseph M. Aulino, Angela M. Bell, R. Carter Cassidy, Santanu Chakraborty, Asim F. Choudhri, Seth Gemme, Ryan K. Lee, Michael D. Luttrull, Darlene F. Metter, Toshio Moritani, Charles Reitman, Lubdha M. Shah, Aseem Sharma, Robert Y. Shih, Laura A. Snyder, Sophia C. Symko, Ralf Thiele, Julie Bykowski
    Journal of the American College of Radiology 2019 16 5
  • Current Status of MRI and PET in the NCCN Guidelines for Prostate Cancer
    Brandon R. Mason, James A. Eastham, Brian J. Davis, Lance A. Mynderse, Thomas J. Pugh, Richard J. Lee, Joseph E. Ippolito
    Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network 2019 17 5
  • 18F-Sodium Fluoride PET: History, Technical Feasibility, Mechanism of Action, Normal Biodistribution, and Diagnostic Performance in Bone Metastasis Detection Compared with Other Imaging Modalities
    Kriti Ahuja, Houman Sotoudeh, Samuel J. Galgano, Ramandeep Singh, Nishant Gupta, Siddhartha Gaddamanugu, Gagandeep Choudhary
    Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology 2020 48 1
  • Radium-223 as an Approved Modality for Treatment of Bone Metastases
    Ana Emília Brito, Elba Etchebehere
    Seminars in Nuclear Medicine 2020 50 2
  • Optimization of a Bayesian penalized likelihood algorithm (Q.Clear) for 18F-NaF bone PET/CT images acquired over shorter durations using a custom-designed phantom
    Tokiya Yoshii, Kenta Miwa, Masashi Yamaguchi, Kai Shimada, Kei Wagatsuma, Tensho Yamao, Yuto Kamitaka, Seiya Hiratsuka, Rinya Kobayashi, Hajime Ichikawa, Noriaki Miyaji, Tsuyoshi Miyazaki, Kenji Ishii
    EJNMMI Physics 2020 7 1
  • Evolution of heterotopic bone in fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: An [18F]NaF PET/CT study
    Esmée Botman, Pieter G.H.M. Raijmakers, Maqsood Yaqub, Bernd Teunissen, Coen Netelenbos, Wouter Lubbers, Lothar A. Schwarte, Dimitra Micha, Nathalie Bravenboer, Ton Schoenmaker, Teun J. de Vries, Gerard Pals, Jan Maerten Smit, Pieter Koolwijk, Dinko González Trotter, Adriaan A. Lammertsma, E. Marelise W. Eekhoff
    Bone 2019 124
  • Accuracy of 18F-NaF PET/CT in bone metastasis detection and its effect on patient management in patients with breast carcinoma
    Wouter A.M. Broos, Friso M. van der Zant, Maurits Wondergem, Remco J.J. Knol
    Nuclear Medicine Communications 2018 39 4
  • Assessment of Bone Lesions with18F-FDG PET Compared with99mTc Bone Scintigraphy Leads to Clinically Relevant Differences in Metastatic Breast Cancer Management
    Suzanne C. van Es, Ton Velleman, Sjoerd G. Elias, Frederike Bensch, Adrienne H. Brouwers, Andor W.J.M. Glaudemans, Thomas C. Kwee, Marleen Woltman-van Iersel, John H. Maduro, Sjoukje F. Oosting, Elisabeth G.E. de Vries, Carolina P. Schröder
    Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2021 62 2

Article usage

Article usage: September 2016 to April 2025

AbstractFullPdf
Sep 201676044
Oct 201682048
Nov 201670017
Dec 201676938275
Jan 2017859200106
Feb 201762220675
Mar 20173279380
Apr 20172166559
May 20171544054
Jun 20171224534
Jul 20171271431
Aug 20171514947
Sep 20171463528
Oct 20172344248
Nov 20171694452
Dec 20171122744
Jan 20181567856
Feb 20181126841
Mar 2018994150
Apr 20181005846
May 2018814151
Jun 2018924233
Jul 2018995736
Aug 2018604535
Sep 2018874844
Oct 20187963141
Nov 201828061142
Dec 20183434119
Jan 20195131150
Feb 2019364072
Mar 20197663102
Apr 2019556470
May 2019394559
Jun 2019315445
Jul 2019444555
Aug 2019253170
Sep 2019515665
Oct 2019417355
Nov 2019857753
Dec 20193013326
Jan 2020347765
Feb 2020424234
Mar 2020547843
Apr 2020227250
May 2020318665
Jun 2020494356
Jul 2020665214
Aug 2020251949
Sep 2020364931
Oct 2020394661
Nov 2020203634
Dec 2020181924
Jan 20211110623
Feb 2021299752
Mar 20213215159
Apr 20211710139
May 202199827
Jun 20212012125
Jul 2021119127
Aug 20211710127
Sep 20211510228
Oct 20211411441
Nov 20211512871
Dec 20211413638
Jan 20221316742
Feb 2022911828
Mar 20221115851
Apr 20221114019
May 20221414646
Jun 20221813524
Jul 20221211615
Aug 20221414529
Sep 20222613935
Oct 20221912330
Nov 2022412255
Dec 202277928
Jan 20231610826
Feb 2023109413
Mar 20231114132
Apr 20231012613
May 2023117217
Jun 20231511016
Jul 2023127212
Aug 20231210618
Sep 2023139726
Oct 20231811029
Nov 20231611232
Dec 20231912524
Jan 20241811619
Feb 2024109618
Mar 2024712852
Apr 20241118247
May 20241415726
Jun 20242013723
Jul 20241812631
Aug 20241214621
Sep 20241719330
Oct 20241116131
Nov 20242311723
Dec 2024514514
Jan 2025815929
Feb 20251022922
Mar 20251220424
Apr 20253419743
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology: 44 (4)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
Vol. 44, Issue 4
December 1, 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Role of 18F-Sodium Fluoride PET/CT Bone Scans in the Diagnosis of Metastatic Bone Disease from Breast and Prostate Cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology web site.
Citation Tools
The Role of 18F-Sodium Fluoride PET/CT Bone Scans in the Diagnosis of Metastatic Bone Disease from Breast and Prostate Cancer
Randeep Kumar Kulshrestha, Sobhan Vinjamuri, Andrew England, Julie Nightingale, Peter Hogg
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Dec 2016, 44 (4) 217-222; DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.116.176859

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The Role of 18F-Sodium Fluoride PET/CT Bone Scans in the Diagnosis of Metastatic Bone Disease from Breast and Prostate Cancer
Randeep Kumar Kulshrestha, Sobhan Vinjamuri, Andrew England, Julie Nightingale, Peter Hogg
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Dec 2016, 44 (4) 217-222; DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.116.176859
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • PRODUCTION AND PHARMACOKINETICS
    • MECHANISM OF UPTAKE
    • COMPARISON WITH 99MTC-MDP, 99MTC-MDP SPECT, AND 18F-NAF PET/CT
    • PROCEDURE AND PATIENT PREPARATION
    • DOSIMETRY
    • ADVANTAGES OF 18F-NAF PET/CT OVER 99MTC-MDP BONE SCINTIGRAPHY
    • CLINICAL EXAMPLES
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Assessment of Bone Lesions with 18F-FDG PET Compared with 99mTc Bone Scintigraphy Leads to Clinically Relevant Differences in Metastatic Breast Cancer Management
  • A Half-Century of Nuclear Medicine
  • 18F-Sodium Fluoride PET: History, Technical Feasibility, Mechanism of Action, Normal Biodistribution, and Diagnostic Performance in Bone Metastasis Detection Compared with Other Imaging Modalities
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Illuminating the Hidden: Standardizing Cardiac MIBG Imaging for Sympathetic Dysfunction
  • PET/CT Case Series: Unmasking the Mystery of Cardiac Sarcoidosis
  • Delivery Methods of Radiopharmaceuticals: Exploring Global Strategies to Minimize Occupational Radiation Exposure
Show more Continuing Education

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • 18F-Sodium fluoride PET/CT
  • 99mTc-MDP
  • bone scintigraphy
  • bone metastases
  • breast cancer
  • prostate cancer
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire