Skip to main content
  • Main menu
  • User menu
  • Search
  • English ▼
    • English
    • Afrikaans
    • Albanian
    • Amharic
    • Arabic
    • Armenian
    • Azerbaijani
    • Basque
    • Belarusian
    • Bengali
    • Bosnian
    • Bulgarian
    • Catalan
    • Cebuano
    • Chichewa
    • Chinese (Simplified)
    • Chinese (Traditional)
    • Corsican
    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Danish
    • Dutch
    • Esperanto
    • Estonian
    • Filipino
    • Finnish
    • French
    • Frisian
    • Galician
    • Georgian
    • German
    • Greek
    • Gujarati
    • Haitian Creole
    • Hausa
    • Hawaiian
    • Hebrew
    • Hindi
    • Hmong
    • Hungarian
    • Icelandic
    • Igbo
    • Indonesian
    • Irish
    • Italian
    • Japanese
    • Javanese
    • Kannada
    • Kazakh
    • Khmer
    • Korean
    • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
    • Kyrgyz
    • Lao
    • Latin
    • Latvian
    • Lithuanian
    • Luxembourgish
    • Macedonian
    • Malagasy
    • Malay
    • Malayalam
    • Maltese
    • Maori
    • Marathi
    • Mongolian
    • Myanmar (Burmese)
    • Nepali
    • Norwegian
    • Pashto
    • Persian
    • Polish
    • Portuguese
    • Punjabi
    • Romanian
    • Russian
    • Samoan
    • Scottish Gaelic
    • Serbian
    • Sesotho
    • Shona
    • Sindhi
    • Sinhala
    • Slovak
    • Slovenian
    • Somali
    • Spanish
    • Sudanese
    • Swahili
    • Swedish
    • Tajik
    • Tamil
    • Telugu
    • Thai
    • Turkish
    • Ukrainian
    • Urdu
    • Uzbek
    • Vietnamese
    • Welsh
    • Xhosa
    • Yiddish
    • Yoruba
    • Zulu

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
      • JNMT Supplement
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

Advanced Search

English ▼
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scottish Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sudanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu
  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Watch or Listen to JNMT Podcast
  • Visit SNMMI on Facebook
  • Join SNMMI on LinkedIn
  • Follow SNMMI on Twitter
  • Subscribe to JNMT RSS feeds
Research ArticleContinuing Education

Diuretic Renal Scintigraphy Protocol Considerations

Kevin P. Banks, Mary Beth Farrell and Justin G. Peacock
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology December 2022, 50 (4) 309-318; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.121.263654
Kevin P. Banks
1Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, Texas;
2Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mary Beth Farrell
3Intersocietal Accreditation Commission, Ellicott City, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Justin G. Peacock
1Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, Texas;
2Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Kidney anatomy and glomerulus function. (A) Kidney is bean-shaped paired organ. Indentation is called hilum and is where renal artery enters, whereas renal vein and ureter exit. Parenchyma comprises outer cortex and inner medulla, with medulla further subdivided into pyramids and columns. This all surrounds CS, which is made up of multiple calyces feeding into pelvis. (B) Blood enters glomerulus containing waste and then leaves filtered. Nephron travels into and out of cortex (separated by dashed line), whereas electrolytes are exchanged and urine concentrated before being excreted into calyces.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    (A) Normal kidney demonstrates small calyces and decompressed renal pelvis. (B) With obstruction (and other disorders), calyces and pelvis become dilated.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    (A) First-minute blood flow phase with frames acquired every second (first 12 s displayed). (B) Dynamic phase with frames acquired every 30 s (minutes 2–7 displayed). Phase is helpful for assessing both parenchymal function and urine drainage.

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    Dual-phase acquisition. (A) First 20 min of findings for right kidney are concerning for obstruction, necessitating diuretic administration. (B) Postdiuretic T-½ of slightly less than 10 min excludes obstruction. Green curve = right kidney; red curve = left kidney; Lasix (Aventis Pharma) = furosemide.

  • FIGURE 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 5.

    Kidney and background ROI techniques. (A) WK ROI with perirenal background. (B) Cortical ROI with perirenal background. (C) CS ROI with perirenal background. Yellow = left kidney background; red = left kidney; green = right kidney; blue = right kidney background.

  • FIGURE 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 6.

    Cortical vs. WK for determination of relative function. (A) Cortical ROIs, calculated relative (split) function, and cortical time–activity curves. (B) WK ROIs, calculated relative (split) function, and WK time–activity curves. Cortical data incorrectly show right kidney to have decreased function compared with left, 46% vs. 54%. Correct data are shown by WK data, with right kidney having greater function than left, 55% vs. 45%, difference of 9%. Also note, a crescent shaped background region of interest is preferred over square background region (yellow and blue).

  • FIGURE 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 7.

    Extensive motion artifact involving first minute of time–activity curve representing flow phase acquired at 1 s per frame. This results in erroneous elevated value at 1 min due to ROIs overlapping vascular activity in liver and spleen (red arrow). Actual right kidney Tpeak is delayed (>5 min) in 7- to 9-min range (green arrows).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1.

    Approach to Best Practices for Adult DRS: Patient Preparation and Acquisition

    ParameterBest practice
    Patient preparation
     Increase in fluid intake day before and morning of examinationIt may be optimal also to have patient avoid natural diuretics, though some experts believe effect is less than fluid consumed
     Withdrawal of prescribed diuretics on morning of examinationThiazides: hydrochlorothiazide, indapamide, metolazone, chlorthalidone
     Loop diuretics: furosemide, bumetanide, torsemide, ethacrynic acid
     Potassium sparing: amiloride, spironolactone, triamterene, eplerenone
     Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors: acetazolamide
     Oral hydration 30–60 min beforehandPatient drinks 5–10 mL/kg
      450–900 mL (15–30 oz, or 2–4 cups) for adults weighing 90.7 kg (200 lb)
      385–770 mL (13–26 oz, or 1.5–3 cups) for adults weighing 77.1 kg (170 lb)
     PrevoidingPatient voids immediately before beginning of examination
    Acquisition
     99mTc-MAG3, 37–185 MBq (1–5 mCi) intravenously99mTc-MAG3 is preferred over 99mTc-DTPA despite cost; lower doses are adequate given that flow/arterial phase can be omitted
     Furosemide, 40 mg intravenouslyIf patient is on higher dose of furosemide at home, increase to match; consider 80–120 mg if known renal insufficiency
      Serum creatinine level > 1.2 ng/dL (women) or > 1.4 ng/dL (men)
      Estimated GFR < 90 mL/min/1.73 m2 (either sex)
     Acquisition and timing of diuretic (most common source of variability; remains actively debated topic with no clear best practice for all situations)F=0 single acquisition or F+20 2-part acquisition; F+10, F+15, and F+30 are also used by many practices, and F+10sp is also considered suitable technique
     Postvoid image (maximizes pressure differential between kidneys and bladder, facilitating physiologic drainage)Patient stands or walks for 5 min, voids, and then is imaged in same position as examined
    • Many quantitative values are dependent on protocol and cannot be universally applied.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2.

    Approach to Best Practices for Adult DRS: Processing and Quantification

    ParameterBest practice
    Processing
     WK ROIIs essential for relative function measurement; generally adequate if kidney function is normal
     Cortical ROIIncludes only parenchyma, not CS and calyces; optimal for assessing functional parameters such as 20-min/max (renal retention) and Tpeak
     CS ROIExcludes parenchyma and has been shown to better represent CS drainage when calculating T-½
     Background ROIIs C-shaped or reniform, 2 pixels wide, and 1 pixel away from cortex
     Relative (split) functionMust be derived from WK ROIs; may be measured using 2- to 3-min intervals, but intervals of 1–2 or 1–2.5 min are recommended if F=0 protocol is used
    Quantification
     Relative (split function)Normal is 45%–55%; abnormal if <40%
     TpeakNormal is <5 min
     T-½ emptyingNormal is <10–15 min; abnormal does not equate to obstruction
     20-min/maxNormal is <0.35 as measured 20 min after Tpeak
     Tissue transit timeActivity should be seen in CS by 5 min; >8 min is delayed
     Postvoid kidney to maximumPostvoid image is acquired 30 min after start, and activity is compared with Tpeak
     Output efficiencyHelps overcome confounding effect of poor renal function on CS drainage assessment; requires special processing software
     Normalized residual activityNormal is <1.0 for 20- to 21-min interval and <0.10 when using 1-min interval acquired after voiding at 60 min from examination start
    • Many quantitative values are dependent on protocol and cannot be universally applied.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology: 50 (4)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
Vol. 50, Issue 4
December 1, 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools
Share
Diuretic Renal Scintigraphy Protocol Considerations
Kevin P. Banks, Mary Beth Farrell, Justin G. Peacock
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Dec 2022, 50 (4) 309-318; DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.121.263654
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • BACKGROUND
    • PREPARATION
    • RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL
    • DIURETIC
    • ACQUISITION
    • PROCESSING
    • QUANTIFICATION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Five Years in Review
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Illuminating the Hidden: Standardizing Cardiac MIBG Imaging for Sympathetic Dysfunction
  • PET/CT Case Series: Unmasking the Mystery of Cardiac Sarcoidosis
  • Delivery Methods of Radiopharmaceuticals: Exploring Global Strategies to Minimize Occupational Radiation Exposure
Show more Continuing Education

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • diuretic
  • renal
  • protocol
  • acquisition
  • processing
  • Lasix
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire
Alerts for this Article
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email this Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Diuretic Renal Scintigraphy Protocol Considerations
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology web site.
Citation Tools
Diuretic Renal Scintigraphy Protocol Considerations
Kevin P. Banks, Mary Beth Farrell, Justin G. Peacock
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Dec 2022, 50 (4) 309-318; DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.121.263654

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience

By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies.