Skip to main content
  • Main menu
  • User menu
  • Search
  • English ▼
    • English
    • Afrikaans
    • Albanian
    • Amharic
    • Arabic
    • Armenian
    • Azerbaijani
    • Basque
    • Belarusian
    • Bengali
    • Bosnian
    • Bulgarian
    • Catalan
    • Cebuano
    • Chichewa
    • Chinese (Simplified)
    • Chinese (Traditional)
    • Corsican
    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Danish
    • Dutch
    • Esperanto
    • Estonian
    • Filipino
    • Finnish
    • French
    • Frisian
    • Galician
    • Georgian
    • German
    • Greek
    • Gujarati
    • Haitian Creole
    • Hausa
    • Hawaiian
    • Hebrew
    • Hindi
    • Hmong
    • Hungarian
    • Icelandic
    • Igbo
    • Indonesian
    • Irish
    • Italian
    • Japanese
    • Javanese
    • Kannada
    • Kazakh
    • Khmer
    • Korean
    • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
    • Kyrgyz
    • Lao
    • Latin
    • Latvian
    • Lithuanian
    • Luxembourgish
    • Macedonian
    • Malagasy
    • Malay
    • Malayalam
    • Maltese
    • Maori
    • Marathi
    • Mongolian
    • Myanmar (Burmese)
    • Nepali
    • Norwegian
    • Pashto
    • Persian
    • Polish
    • Portuguese
    • Punjabi
    • Romanian
    • Russian
    • Samoan
    • Scottish Gaelic
    • Serbian
    • Sesotho
    • Shona
    • Sindhi
    • Sinhala
    • Slovak
    • Slovenian
    • Somali
    • Spanish
    • Sudanese
    • Swahili
    • Swedish
    • Tajik
    • Tamil
    • Telugu
    • Thai
    • Turkish
    • Ukrainian
    • Urdu
    • Uzbek
    • Vietnamese
    • Welsh
    • Xhosa
    • Yiddish
    • Yoruba
    • Zulu

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
      • JNMT Supplement
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

Advanced Search

English ▼
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scottish Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sudanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu
  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Watch or Listen to JNMT Podcast
  • Visit SNMMI on Facebook
  • Join SNMMI on LinkedIn
  • Follow SNMMI on Twitter
  • Subscribe to JNMT RSS feeds
Research ArticleImaging

Comparing the Patient Experience Between a 360° γ-Camera and a Conventional Dual-Head γ-Camera

Hend Komber, David Little, Sarah Cade, Richard Graham and Stewart Redman
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology June 2022, 50 (2) 132-136; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.121.262627
Hend Komber
Department of Radiology, Royal United Hospitals NHS Trust, Bath, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Little
Department of Radiology, Royal United Hospitals NHS Trust, Bath, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sarah Cade
Department of Radiology, Royal United Hospitals NHS Trust, Bath, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard Graham
Department of Radiology, Royal United Hospitals NHS Trust, Bath, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stewart Redman
Department of Radiology, Royal United Hospitals NHS Trust, Bath, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Information

vol. 50 no. 2 132-136
DOI 
https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.121.262627
PubMed 
34750232

Published By 
Society of Nuclear Medicine
Print ISSN 
0091-4916
Online ISSN 
1535-5675
History 
  • Received for publication May 25, 2021
  • Revision received September 25, 2021
  • Published online June 3, 2022.

Article Versions

  • previous version (November 8, 2021 - 15:00).
  • You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Copyright & Usage 
© 2022 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

Author Information

  1. Hend Komber,
  2. David Little,
  3. Sarah Cade,
  4. Richard Graham and
  5. Stewart Redman
  1. Department of Radiology, Royal United Hospitals NHS Trust, Bath, United Kingdom
  1. For correspondence or reprints, contact Stewart Redman (stewart.redman@nhs.net).
View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Article has an altmetric score of 6

See more details

Posted by 6 X users
7 readers on Mendeley

Cited By...

  • 9 Citations
  • 10 Citations
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Dynamic cardiac SPECT with flow measurement using 3D-ring CZT: when SPECT is inspired by PET
    Matthieu Bailly, Aurélien Callaud, Gilles Metrard
    European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 2023 50 6
  • EANM position paper on challenges and opportunities of full-ring 360° CZT bone imaging: it’s time to let go of planar whole-body bone imaging
    Richard Graham, David Morland, Sarah Cade, Laetitia Imbert, Emmanouil Panagiotidis, Jens Kurth, Frédéric Paycha, Tim Van den Wyngaert
    European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 2025 52 3
  • Comparison of the detectability of hot lesions on bone SPECT using six state-of-the-art SPECT/CT systems: a multicenter phantom study to optimize reconstruction parameters
    Hajime Ichikawa, Takayuki Shibutani, Yuki Matsutake, Toyohiro Kato, Ryuji Ikematsu, Riwa Higashi, Takashi Kamiya, Hideki Shimada, Masahisa Onoguchi
    Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine 2023 46 2
  • The new bone WB-SPECT/CT: hybrid, from head-to-toe and digital! Is it worth the effort?
    Luca Filippi, Viviana Frantellizzi, Giuseppe De Vincentis, Orazio Schillaci
    Expert Review of Medical Devices 2023 20 10
  • 3D-Ring CZT System With New Low- and Medium-Energy Range
    Aurélien Callaud, Gilles Metrard, Matthieu Bailly
    Clinical Nuclear Medicine 2023 48 8
  • 360° CZT-SPECT/CT cameras: 99mTc- and 177Lu-phantom-based evaluation under clinical conditions
    Christopher Hoog, Pierre-Malick Koulibaly, Nicolas Sas, Laetitia Imbert, Gilles Le Rouzic, Romain Popoff, Jean-Noël Badel, Ludovic Ferrer
    EJNMMI Physics 2024 11 1
  • Accuracy of a whole‐body single‐photon emission computed tomography with a thallium‐bromide detector: Verification via Monte Carlo simulations
    Toshimune Ito, Keitaro Hitomi, Michael Ljungberg, Sousei Kawasaki, Yuka Katayama, Akane Kato, Hirotatsu Tsuchikame, Kentaro Suzuki, Kyosuke Miyazaki, Ritsushi Mogi
    Medical Physics 2025
  • Clinical Atlas of Bone SPECT/CT
    Tim Van den Wyngaert
    2023
  • Clinical Atlas of Bone SPECT/CT
    Tim Van den Wyngaert
    2023
  • Noise level and no-reference-based evaluations for gamma-ray image using non-local means algorithm with CZT photon counting semiconductor detector
    Youngjin Lee
    Applied Radiation and Isotopes 2025 217

Article usage

Article usage: December 2021 to May 2025

AbstractFullPdf
AbstractFullPdf
Nov 2021353011
Dec 202114806
Jan 202211203
Feb 2022183013
Mar 202218102
Apr 202221005
May 202217806
Jun 202224024
Jul 202218444
Aug 2022303114
Sep 202232015
Oct 202231301
Nov 202228235
Dec 202214204
Jan 202322736
Feb 202315201
Mar 202369223
Apr 202355010
May 20235209
Jun 2023271017
Jul 2023211224
Aug 2023171222
Sep 2023241421
Oct 2023241316
Nov 2023201927
Dec 2023174330
Jan 2024203716
Feb 2024222120
Mar 2024251635
Apr 2024182640
May 2024165441
Jun 2024133123
Jul 2024243924
Aug 2024204926
Sep 2024384979
Oct 2024333340
Nov 2024401640
Dec 2024171834
Jan 2025171618
Feb 2025146118
Mar 2025153141
Apr 2025274769
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology: 50 (2)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
Vol. 50, Issue 2
June 1, 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools
Share
Comparing the Patient Experience Between a 360° γ-Camera and a Conventional Dual-Head γ-Camera
Hend Komber, David Little, Sarah Cade, Richard Graham, Stewart Redman
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Jun 2022, 50 (2) 132-136; DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.121.262627
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Early 10-Minute Postinjection [18F]F-FAPI-42 uEXPLORER Total-Body PET/CT Scanning Protocol for Staging Lung Cancer Using HYPER Iterative Reconstruction
  • Single- Versus Dual-Time-Point Imaging for Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloid Using 99mTc-Pyrophosphate
  • Does Arthrography Improve Accuracy of SPECT/CT for Diagnosis of Aseptic Loosening in Patients with Painful Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis
Show more Imaging

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • claustrophobia
  • Discovery 670
  • γ-camera
  • patient experience
  • Veriton-CT
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire
Alerts for this Article
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email this Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparing the Patient Experience Between a 360° γ-Camera and a Conventional Dual-Head γ-Camera
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology web site.
Citation Tools
Comparing the Patient Experience Between a 360° γ-Camera and a Conventional Dual-Head γ-Camera
Hend Komber, David Little, Sarah Cade, Richard Graham, Stewart Redman
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Jun 2022, 50 (2) 132-136; DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.121.262627

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience

By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies.