Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
      • JNMT Supplement
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Watch or Listen to JNMT Podcast
  • Visit SNMMI on Facebook
  • Join SNMMI on LinkedIn
  • Follow SNMMI on Twitter
  • Subscribe to JNMT RSS feeds
Research ArticleImaging

Added Value of Digital over Analog PET/CT: More Significant as Image Field of View and Body Mass Index Increase

Shirin Hatami, Sarah Frye, Anna McMunn, Crystal Botkin, Razi Muzaffar, Kara Christopher and Medhat Osman
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology December 2020, 48 (4) 354-360; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.120.244160
Shirin Hatami
1Doisy College of Health Sciences, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri
RT (R)(MR)(ARRT)(NMCT)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sarah Frye
1Doisy College of Health Sciences, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anna McMunn
2Saint Louis University Hospital, SSM Health, St. Louis, Missouri
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Crystal Botkin
1Doisy College of Health Sciences, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Razi Muzaffar
3Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kara Christopher
4Saint Louis University Hospital, Cancer Center, St. Louis, Missouri
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Medhat Osman
3Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Information

vol. 48 no. 4 354-360
DOI 
https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.120.244160
PubMed 
32887763

Published By 
Society of Nuclear Medicine
Print ISSN 
0091-4916
Online ISSN 
1535-5675
History 
  • Received for publication February 25, 2020
  • Accepted for publication July 9, 2020
  • Published online December 3, 2020.

Article Versions

  • previous version (September 4, 2020 - 12:35).
  • You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Copyright & Usage 
© 2020 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

Author Information

  1. Shirin Hatami, RT (R)(MR)(ARRT)(NMCT)1,
  2. Sarah Frye1,
  3. Anna McMunn2,
  4. Crystal Botkin1,
  5. Razi Muzaffar3,
  6. Kara Christopher4 and
  7. Medhat Osman3
  1. 1Doisy College of Health Sciences, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri
  2. 2Saint Louis University Hospital, SSM Health, St. Louis, Missouri
  3. 3Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri; and
  4. 4Saint Louis University Hospital, Cancer Center, St. Louis, Missouri
  1. For correspondence or reprints contact: Shirin Hatami, Doisy College of Health Sciences, Saint Louis University, 1 N. Grand Blvd., St. Louis, MO 63103. E-mail: shirin.hatami019{at}gmail.com
View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Cited By...

  • 14 Citations
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Digital PET vs Analog PET: Clinical Implications?
    Diego Alfonso López-Mora, Ignasi Carrió, Albert Flotats
    Seminars in Nuclear Medicine 2022 52 3
  • Assessment of Image Quality and Lesion Detectability With Digital PET/CT System
    Olivier Delcroix, David Bourhis, Nathalie Keromnes, Philippe Robin, Pierre-Yves Le Roux, Ronan Abgral, Pierre-Yves Salaun, Solène Querellou
    Frontiers in Medicine 2021 8
  • A review of digital PET-CT technology: Comparing performance parameters in SiPM integrated digital PET-CT systems
    M.K. Singh
    Radiography 2024 30 1
  • Improved detection of in-transit metastases of malignant melanoma with BSREM reconstruction in digital [18F]FDG PET/CT
    Virginia Liberini, Michael Messerli, Lars Husmann, Ken Kudura, Hannes Grünig, Alexander Maurer, Stephan Skawran, Erika Orita, Daniele A. Pizzuto, Désirée Deandreis, Reinhard Dummer, Joanna Mangana, Daniela Mihic-Probst, Niels Rupp, Martin W. Huellner
    European Radiology 2021 31 10
  • Comparing lesion detection efficacy and image quality across different PET system generations to optimize the iodine-124 PET protocol for recurrent thyroid cancer
    David Kersting, Walter Jentzen, Miriam Sraieb, Pedro Fragoso Costa, Maurizio Conti, Lale Umutlu, Gerald Antoch, Michael Nader, Ken Herrmann, Wolfgang Peter Fendler, Christoph Rischpler, Manuel Weber
    EJNMMI Physics 2021 8 1
  • The role of PET imaging in inflammatory bowel diseases: state-of-the-art review
    Pierre LOVINFOSSE, Roland HUSTINX
    The Quarterly Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 2022 66 3
  • Advantages of SiPM-based digital PET/CT technology in nuclear medicine clinical practice: a systematic review– part 2
    Guido Rovera, Luca Urso, Federica Stracuzzi, Riccardo Laudicella, Viviana Frantellizzi, Chiara Cottignoli, Maria Gazzilli, Priscilla Guglielmo, Stefano Panareo, Laura Evangelista, Angelina Filice, Luca Burroni
    Clinical and Translational Imaging 2024 12 6
  • The Correlation of Body Mass Index with Risk of Recurrence in Post-Menopausal Women with Breast Cancer Undergoing Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography
    Natale Quartuccio, Salvatore Ialuna, Sabina Pulizzi, Dante D’Oppido, Mauro Antoni, Antonino Maria Moreci
    Journal of Clinical Medicine 2024 13 6
  • Deep Learning Denoising Improves and Homogenizes Patient [18F]FDG PET Image Quality in Digital PET/CT
    Kathleen Weyts, Elske Quak, Idlir Licaj, Renaud Ciappuccini, Charline Lasnon, Aurélien Corroyer-Dulmont, Gauthier Foucras, Stéphane Bardet, Cyril Jaudet
    Diagnostics 2023 13 9
  • Advantages of SiPM-based digital PET/CT technology in nuclear medicine clinical practice: a systematic review—Part 1 oncological setting
    Guido Rovera, Luca Urso, Federica Stracuzzi, Riccardo Laudicella, Viviana Frantellizzi, Chiara Cottignoli, Maria Gazzilli, Priscilla Guglielmo, Stefano Panareo, Laura Evangelista, Angelina Filice, Luca Burroni
    Clinical and Translational Imaging 2024 12 6

Article usage

Article usage: September 2020 to April 2025

AbstractFullPdf
Sep 202015003
Oct 202010103
Nov 20206802
Dec 202019637
Jan 202111946
Feb 2021171815
Mar 202113049
Apr 202185125
May 20217011
Jun 20215432
Jul 20215261
Aug 20218192
Sep 202110611
Oct 20216132
Nov 20217823
Dec 2021224214
Jan 2022214813
Feb 202267520
Mar 2022168224
Apr 2022178520
May 202277927
Jun 2022125915
Jul 202273711
Aug 202234624
Sep 202274621
Oct 2022115921
Nov 20223418
Dec 20227367
Jan 202353218
Feb 20237286
Mar 2023114719
Apr 2023117617
May 202367414
Jun 202353916
Jul 202384220
Aug 202394724
Sep 202336616
Oct 202383410
Nov 202388119
Dec 202398024
Jan 2024511472
Feb 202493814
Mar 202463576
Apr 202477825
May 2024126923
Jun 2024145720
Jul 2024105030
Aug 202472614
Sep 2024124830
Oct 2024144125
Nov 2024162218
Dec 202492710
Jan 202543819
Feb 20251110211
Mar 2025125933
Apr 2025186227
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology: 48 (4)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
Vol. 48, Issue 4
December 1, 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Added Value of Digital over Analog PET/CT: More Significant as Image Field of View and Body Mass Index Increase
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology web site.
Citation Tools
Added Value of Digital over Analog PET/CT: More Significant as Image Field of View and Body Mass Index Increase
Shirin Hatami, Sarah Frye, Anna McMunn, Crystal Botkin, Razi Muzaffar, Kara Christopher, Medhat Osman
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Dec 2020, 48 (4) 354-360; DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.120.244160

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Added Value of Digital over Analog PET/CT: More Significant as Image Field of View and Body Mass Index Increase
Shirin Hatami, Sarah Frye, Anna McMunn, Crystal Botkin, Razi Muzaffar, Kara Christopher, Medhat Osman
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Dec 2020, 48 (4) 354-360; DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.120.244160
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Early 10-Minute Postinjection [18F]F-FAPI-42 uEXPLORER Total-Body PET/CT Scanning Protocol for Staging Lung Cancer Using HYPER Iterative Reconstruction
  • Single- Versus Dual-Time-Point Imaging for Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloid Using 99mTc-Pyrophosphate
  • Does Arthrography Improve Accuracy of SPECT/CT for Diagnosis of Aseptic Loosening in Patients with Painful Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis
Show more Imaging

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Scan time
  • DLP
  • weight-based dosing
  • BMI
  • Digital
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire