Article Figures & Data
Figures
- FIGURE 1.
Lara system consists of 2 scintillation sensors, 2 pads, reader, and docking station. Sensors are placed on injection arm and contralateral arm. Time–activity curve is provided after data upload.
Tables
Center Rate A 13.3% B 15.7% C 12.8% D 2.1% E 3.2% F 2.7% G 1.9% Centers’ volumes are not included to ensure center anonymity.
Center Measure-phase rate SE Improve-phase rate SE Change A 13.3% 2.1% 2.9% 1.0% −78% B 15.7% 4.0% 6.0% 2.6% −62% C 12.8% 1.5% 8.7% 1.3% −32% D 2.1% 0.6% 1.9% 0.6% −10% Centers’ volumes are not included to help ensure individual center anonymity.
- TABLE 3
Associative Factor Analysis for Binary Infiltration Outcome: Significant Associations
Effect (all data, all phases) P Hand/wrist/forearm injections are associated with higher predicted probability of infiltration than is antecubital fossa injection <0.0001 Radiotracer dose is positively associated with infiltration <0.0001 Weight is negatively associated with infiltration <0.0001 Flush volume is negatively associated with infiltration <0.0001 Phase Adjusted 3-center aggregated infiltration rate Number of injections SE 95% CI Measure 12.1% 815 2.4% 8.2, 17.5 Improve 6.2% 830 1.4% 3.9, 9.5 Control 5.2% 1,763 1.1% 3.5, 7.8 CI = confidence interval.
Jump to section
Related Articles
Cited By...
- Multicenter Evaluation of Frequency and Impact of Activity Infiltration in PET Imaging, Including Microscale Modeling of Skin-Absorbed Dose
- Adverse Clinical Events at the Injection Site Are Exceedingly Rare After Reported Radiopharmaceutical Extravasation in Patients Undergoing 99mTc-MDP Whole-Body Bone Scintigraphy: A 12-Year Experience
- Topical Sensor for the Assessment of PET Dose Administration: Metric Performance with an Autoinjector
- Detection of 18F-FDG Dose Leakage Using a Topical Device
- Its Time to Celebrate!
- 2019: A Year of Reflection
- 2019: A Year of Reflection