Skip to main content
  • Main menu
  • User menu
  • Search
  • English ▼
    • English
    • Afrikaans
    • Albanian
    • Amharic
    • Arabic
    • Armenian
    • Azerbaijani
    • Basque
    • Belarusian
    • Bengali
    • Bosnian
    • Bulgarian
    • Catalan
    • Cebuano
    • Chichewa
    • Chinese (Simplified)
    • Chinese (Traditional)
    • Corsican
    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Danish
    • Dutch
    • Esperanto
    • Estonian
    • Filipino
    • Finnish
    • French
    • Frisian
    • Galician
    • Georgian
    • German
    • Greek
    • Gujarati
    • Haitian Creole
    • Hausa
    • Hawaiian
    • Hebrew
    • Hindi
    • Hmong
    • Hungarian
    • Icelandic
    • Igbo
    • Indonesian
    • Irish
    • Italian
    • Japanese
    • Javanese
    • Kannada
    • Kazakh
    • Khmer
    • Korean
    • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
    • Kyrgyz
    • Lao
    • Latin
    • Latvian
    • Lithuanian
    • Luxembourgish
    • Macedonian
    • Malagasy
    • Malay
    • Malayalam
    • Maltese
    • Maori
    • Marathi
    • Mongolian
    • Myanmar (Burmese)
    • Nepali
    • Norwegian
    • Pashto
    • Persian
    • Polish
    • Portuguese
    • Punjabi
    • Romanian
    • Russian
    • Samoan
    • Scottish Gaelic
    • Serbian
    • Sesotho
    • Shona
    • Sindhi
    • Sinhala
    • Slovak
    • Slovenian
    • Somali
    • Spanish
    • Sudanese
    • Swahili
    • Swedish
    • Tajik
    • Tamil
    • Telugu
    • Thai
    • Turkish
    • Ukrainian
    • Urdu
    • Uzbek
    • Vietnamese
    • Welsh
    • Xhosa
    • Yiddish
    • Yoruba
    • Zulu

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
      • JNMT Supplement
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

Advanced Search

English ▼
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scottish Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sudanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu
  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Watch or Listen to JNMT Podcast
  • Visit SNMMI on Facebook
  • Join SNMMI on LinkedIn
  • Follow SNMMI on Twitter
  • Subscribe to JNMT RSS feeds
Research ArticleImaging

Clinical Impact of Lower-Limb Imaging in 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for Patients with Prostate Cancer

Duygu Has Simsek, Yasemin Sanli, Serkan Kuyumcu, Muge Nur Engin, Fikret Buyukkaya and Emre Demirci
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology September 2019, 47 (3) 233-237; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.118.224303
Duygu Has Simsek
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yasemin Sanli
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Serkan Kuyumcu
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Muge Nur Engin
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fikret Buyukkaya
2Faculty of Health Sciences, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Emre Demirci
3Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Yeditepe University, Yeditepe, Turkey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Our purpose was to determine whether there is a clinical benefit to add lower-limb imaging in 68Ga-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT scans for patients with prostate cancer. Methods: In total, 701 patients with prostate cancer who underwent 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT were evaluated retrospectively. All patients underwent additional lower-limb imaging. Images were reanalyzed by experienced nuclear medicine physicians, and metastatic sites were documented. The prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level and Gleason score were also compared with 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT findings. Results: In 601 patients (85.7%), at least 1 tumoral lesion was observed on 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT. The number of patients with bone metastasis in 2 forms was 278 patients (39.6%); 108 (15.4%) were oligometastatic (<4 metastases) and 170 (24.2%) were multimetastatic (≥4 metastases). In lower-limb imaging, bone metastasis was detected in 61 patients (8.7%), the specific locations of which were as follows: middle–distal femur (n = 54), tibia (n = 19), fibula (n = 24), and calcaneus (n = 1). Lower-limb metastasis was detected mostly in symptom-positive patients (70.1%) but in only 4% of the symptom-negative group. All patients with lower-extremity metastasis also had multiple bone metastases shown on limited whole-body 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT. The median PSA level was significantly higher in multimetastatic patients with lower-limb metastasis than in those without lower-limb metastasis (P < 0.001, Mann–Whitney U test), but no statistical differences was found in terms of Gleason score (χ2 = 0.042, P = 0.837). According to receiver-operating-characteristic analysis, PSA has a good predictive value for detecting lower-limb metastasis, with 76.6% sensitivity and 72% specificity (using a reference cutoff PSA level of 24 ng/mL [area under the curve, 0.81; 95% confidence interval, 0.74–0.87]). Conclusion: Lower-limb imaging did not change the metastatic status of disease or significantly affect the therapeutic approach. However, if multimetastatic patients present relevant symptoms for lower-limb metastasis, it could be beneficial to consider including lower-limb imaging for possible palliative therapies.

  • prostate cancer
  • 68Ga-PSMA
  • PET/CT
  • lower limb

Prostate cancer (PC) is one of the most common cancers seen in men across the world. The incidence of PC has been increasing in recent years; it alone now accounts for almost 1 in 5 new cancer diagnoses (1). Although most patients have localized disease at initial diagnosis, distant metastasis can occur in 35% of cases during follow-up (2). Bone is the most common site of metastasis, accounting for more than 80% of all cases, and is associated with a high risk of morbidity (3). Detection of bone metastasis with conventional imaging modalities is limited, with bone scintigraphy being most commonly used for the assessment of skeletal metastasis in PC (4,5). Recently, the use of several PET radiotracers has been proposed for PC imaging, including a prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) that is a transmembranous enzyme significantly overexpressed in most PC cases (6–9). We and others have previously shown the diagnostic power of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in the assessment of bone metastasis (6,7,10). However, the scanning area in 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT is generally limited to the area from the base of the skull to the upper thigh to decrease scanning time, in contrast to whole-body bone scintigraphy (11). Thus, metastasis of the lower limbs can be missed in 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT because this area is beyond its range. In our clinic, lower-limb imaging is performed on all patients with PC, in addition to the limited whole-body 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT imaging. Within this study, we intended to determine whether there is a clinical benefit to additional lower-limb imaging in 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT scans for patients with PC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients

In total, 735 patients who underwent a 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT scan at our clinic between January 2015 and December 2017 were reviewed, and 701 patients with histologically confirmed PC were included in this retrospective study (mean age, 62 y; range, 50–92 y). 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT scans were performed for staging (n = 249), restaging (n = 376), and therapy response (n = 76). Patients with bone pain in the distal extremities and numbness or weakness in the legs were categorized as symptom-positive. The median serum free prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level was 9.3 ng/mL (range, 0.003–4,227 ng/mL). The initial median Gleason score (GS) was 7 (range, 5–10). Details of the patients’ characteristics are given in Table 1. This retrospective study was approved by our institutional review board, and written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of Patients

68Ga-PSMA Synthesis and PET/CT Acquisition

We applied 68Ga-PSMA labeling according to a protocol described in the literature (12). 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT was performed on a dedicated PET/CT scanner (Biograph TruePoint PET/CT; Siemens Healthcare) at 45–60 min after the intravenous injection of approximately 185 MBq of 68Ga-PSMA. An iodine-based oral contrast agent was administered to all patients. The whole body of all patients was scanned in 2 steps. A scan was acquired from the top of the head through the upper thigh, and a separate scan was acquired of the rest of the lower limbs. The CT acquisition was performed on a spiral CT scanner, with a slice thickness of 4 mm and a pitch of 1. After the CT scan, 3-dimensional PET images were acquired for 3 min per bed position for limited whole-body imaging and 2 min per bed position for lower-limb imaging. CT-based attenuation correction of the emission images was used. PET images were reconstructed by the iterative method using ordered-subset expectation maximization (2 iterations and 8 subsets). After completion of the PET acquisition, the reconstructed attenuation-corrected PET images, CT images, and fused PET/CT images were reviewed. The effective doses for additional lower-limb CT examinations were calculated by summing the tissue-weighted equivalent doses for all tissues irradiated based on ICRP-103 weighting factors (13)

Image Analysis

The images were visually evaluated by a minimum of 2 experienced nuclear medicine physicians. Areas of abnormally increased tracer uptake in relation to PC metastasis were documented. Bone metastasis was listed as lower-extremity metastasis when detected on additional lower-limb imaging. Patients with bone metastasis were also categorized as having either oligometastatic disease (<4 metastases) or multimetastatic disease (≥4 metastases) (based on data from a previously published study) (14). All suspected lesions were also evaluated with other imaging, including CT, MRI, multiparametric MRI, bone scintigraphy, 18F-NaF-PET/CT, and histopathologic results (if present). The effect of clinical management was evaluated by the diagnostic information from the limited whole-body and lower-limb 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT scans and surveillance of disease with a minimum 6 mo of follow-up.

Statistical Analysis

The Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare serum PSA levels, and the χ2 test was used to compare the following: GS (5–7 vs. 8–10) in both positive and negative 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT scans, multimetastatic versus oligometastatic patients, and multimetastatic patients with lower-limb metastasis versus patients without lower-limb metastasis according to 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT findings. Statistical significance was assumed for P values of less than 0.05. Receiver-operating-characteristic curves were plotted to evaluate the utility of serum PSA in detecting patients with lower-limb metastasis. The area under the curves, with corresponding 95% confidence intervals, were calculated. Optimal serum PSA cutoffs were then determined by taking the left upper point in the receiver-operating-characteristic curve and the corresponding sensitivity and specificity. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS statistics, version 24.

RESULTS

In 601 patients (85.7%), at least 1 positive tumoral lesion was detected on 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT. In the remaining 100 patients (14.3%), 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT images were negative. The prostate or prostatic bed was the most common site, with the presence of a tumor observed in 400 patients. Seminal vesicle invasion was detected in 58 patients (8.2%), and gross invasion to the bladder or rectum was observed in 29 patients (4.1%). At least one lymph node metastasis was detected in 300 patients (42.7%). This was localized in the pelvic region of 272 patients (38.8%), was in the abdomen of 128 patients (18.2%), and was supradiaphragmatic in 91 patients (12.9%). Thirty-six patients (5.1%) had lung metastasis, and 24 patients (3.4%) had liver metastasis. Least commonly, metastasis to either the brain, adrenal gland, or peritoneum was observed in 15 patients (2.1%). Lastly, bone metastasis was detected in 278 patients (39.6%). Suggestive 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT findings were correlated with other scans, including MRI (n = 56), multiparametric MRI (n = 14), and 18F-NaF PET/CT (n = 3). Histopathologic correlation was performed for final diagnosis (n = 4).

On the basis of the previously described criteria, of the 278 patients with bone metastasis, 108 (15.4%) had oligometastatic disease and 170 (24.2%) had multimetastatic disease. In lower-limb imaging, at least 1 bone metastasis was detected in 61 patients (8.7%). Middle–distal femur metastasis was observed in 54 patients. Tibia metastasis was detected in 19 patients, and fibula metastasis was detected in 24 patients (Fig. 1). One patient with multimetastatic disease also had calcaneus metastasis. All patients with lower-extremity metastasis had multiple bone metastases shown on the limited whole-body 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT scan. None of these patients had oligometastatic disease, nor did they have isolated lower-extremity metastasis.

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Example of multimetastatic patient with tibial metastasis of PC. A 75-y-old man who received androgen deprivation therapy was scanned with 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for restaging because of elevated serum PSA level (GS, 4 + 3 = 7; PSA, 25.17 ng/mL). Pathologic 68Ga-PSMA uptake in sclerotic metastases was seen to have localized in right fifth rib (arrows on axial CT [F] and axial fusion [G]), T1 vertebra (arrow on fusion [B]), T9–T11 vertebrae (arrows on sagittal CT [C] and sagittal fusion [D]), and right iliac crest (arrows on axial CT [J] and axial fusion [K]) on limited whole-body 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT images (maximum-intensity projection [A]). Additionally, sclerotic metastasis in right distal tibia with intense 68Ga-PSMA uptake (arrows on sagittal CT [H], sagittal fusion [I], and coronal PET [E]) was seen on lower-limb 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT images. Stage of disease did not change with tibial metastasis. However, patient had leg pain for almost 4 wk and received external radiotherapy for palliation.

Lower-limb metastasis was detected more frequently in a therapy response group, at 26.3% (in 20/76 patients), which comprised patients with known bone metastasis from previous imaging. In the restaging group, the ratio was slightly higher than in the staging group, at 8.5% (32/376) versus 3.6% (9/249), respectively. When we evaluated patients according to the presence of symptoms, 39 of 55 symptom-positive patients (70.1%) had lower-limb metastasis and 22 of 546 symptom-negative patients (4%) had lower-limb metastasis. Meanwhile, demonstrating the lower-limb metastasis did not change the metastatic status or significantly affect the therapeutic approach. Patients with symptoms or riskier metastasis of weight-bearing bone were treated with analgesics, bisphosphonates, and external radiotherapy.

We compared the median PSA value and GS for positive versus negative 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT scans, multimetastatic versus oligometastatic patients, and multimetastatic patients with lower-limb metastasis versus those without lower-limb metastasis. The median PSA value was significantly higher in positive than in negative 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT scans (P < 0.001), multimetastatic than in oligometastatic patients (P < 0.001), and multimetastatic patients with lower-limb metastasis than in those without lower-limb metastasis (P < 0.001), according to the Mann–Whitney U test. A higher GS (8–10) was correlated with positive 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT scans and multimetastatic disease, in comparison to negative 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT scans (χ2 = 26.642, P < 0.001) and oligometastatic disease (χ2 = 13.902, P < 0.001). However, no statistical differences were found between the multimetastatic patients with lower-limb metastasis and those without lower-limb metastasis in terms of GS, according to the χ2 test (χ2 = 0.042, P = 0.837).

We evaluated the utility of PSA to diagnose lower-limb metastasis by a receiver-operating-characteristic curve analysis. The area under the curve (0.81; 95% confidence interval, 0.74–0.87) revealed that PSA has a good predictive value for detecting lower-limb metastasis. Using a PSA reference cutoff of 24 ng/mL, we could correctly detect lower-limb metastasis with 76.6% sensitivity and 72% specificity (Fig. 2). The results of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT imaging and the distribution of metastasis are shown in Table 2.

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

Receiver-operating-characteristic curves for PSA.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2

Results of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT Imaging

The effective doses for additional lower-limb CT scans were based on ICRP-103 weighting factors. The median dose for lower-limb CT scans was 2.33 mSv (range, 1.1–4.07 mSv).

DISCUSSION

Bone is the most common site of PC metastasis, representing over 80% of all cases, and is associated with a high risk of morbidity (3). Detection or exclusion of bone metastasis has clinical significance for the management and prognosis of patients (15). Bone scintigraphy is commonly used for the assessment of skeletal metastasis in PC (4,5). In possessing a high diagnostic power, 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT scans were recently proposed for PC imaging for the assessment of bone metastasis (6,7,10). However, scanning is generally limited to the area from the base of the skull to the upper thigh, in contrast to whole-body bone scintigraphy (11). A limited whole-body 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT scan is performed for 5–7 bed positions at 3–5 min per position, requiring a total time of 15–35 min. Lower-limb imaging is acquired for 5–7 bed positions, adding an extra 10–14 min of acquisition time per patient. Many nuclear medicine departments perform limited whole-body 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT scans in daily practice to decrease scanning time. Thus, bone metastasis of lower limbs can be missed on PET/CT scans because they fall outside the field of view.

In the literature, there are limited numbers of studies including whole-body 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT scans (6,16,17). Pyka et al. discussed the distribution of bone metastasis in PC by comparing bone scans and whole-body 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT scans in 126 patients (17). That study documented that there is a higher lower-extremity metastasis ratio in a whole-body 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT scan than in a bone scan, with data standing at 9.2% versus 7.9% retrospectively, thus supporting our idea. Because of limited data about the incidence of lower-extremity metastasis of PC, we have checked the results of previous studies that used bone scintigraphy and CT as an imaging modality for the detection of PC. The ratio of lower-limb metastasis was higher in the tibia and fibula than was seen in other studies (18,19). We thought that the superior resolution of the PET/CT may have been the reason for the detection of higher numbers of these lower-limb bone metastases. Overall, the detection of lower-extremity metastasis with 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT did not change the metastatic status of disease. Lower-limb metastasis was, at most, part of widespread metastasis in the whole body.

According to our results, none of the PC patients had any isolated lower-extremity metastasis. However, a limited number of PC cases with isolated lower-extremity metastasis have been reported in literature (20–23). According to previous reported hypotheses, metastasis may spread to the lower extremities through the Batson plexus, during thermal changes, as a result of trauma, or by hemodynamic factors (24,25). In this present study, lower-limb metastasis was mostly seen in both symptom-positive groups and patients with high PSA levels (>24 ng/mL). Thus, the use of additional lower-limb imaging may be considered in symptomatic patients, when high PSA levels cannot be explained by a limited whole-body 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT scan alone.

Skeleton-related issues, such as pathologic fractures and spinal cord compression, have great importance in terms of morbidity (26). The weight-bearing bones (such as the proximal femurs or lumbar vertebrae) are the areas that pose the highest risk, and these are sufficiently scanned in limited whole-body 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT (27). In this current study, none of the patients with lower-extremity metastasis had pathologic fractures during follow-up. Patients with symptomatic and at-risk weight-bearing bone metastasis were treated with analgesics, bisphosphonates, and external radiotherapy. The presentation of lower-extremity metastasis on additional 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT scans has not affected the therapeutic approach significantly (besides the exposure of the patient to additional radiation). However, if patients present symptoms suggestive of lower-limb metastasis, additional 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT imaging may show lower-extremity metastasis that could be treated with palliative therapies. On the basis of our results, we presume that symptom-positive, multimetastatic patients with a higher PSA level (>24 ng/mL) are at a higher risk of developing lower-limb metastasis.

The main limitation of the present study was its retrospective nature. Additionally, for ethical reasons, histologic confirmation of metastasis was mostly unavailable. Imaging results were therefore used instead.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the first report that evaluates additional lower-limb 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT imaging for PC over a large patient population. According to our results, lower-limb imaging did not change the metastatic status of disease, nor did it affect the therapeutic approach significantly. However, if multimetastatic patients present relevant symptoms for lower-limb metastasis, it could be beneficial to consider including lower-limb imaging for possible palliative therapies.

DISCLOSURE

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Footnotes

  • Published online Apr. 24, 2019.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Siegel RL,
    2. Miller KD,
    3. Jemal A
    . Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:7–30.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.↵
    1. Bubendorf L,
    2. Schöpfer A,
    3. Wagner U,
    4. et al
    . Metastatic patterns of prostate cancer: an autopsy study of 1,589 patients. Hum Pathol. 2000;31:578–583.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.↵
    1. Sturge J,
    2. Caley MP,
    3. Waxman J
    . Bone metastasis in prostate cancer: emerging therapeutic strategies. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2011;8:357–368.
    OpenUrlPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.↵
    1. Heidenreich A,
    2. Bastian PJ,
    3. Bellmunt J,
    4. et al
    . EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent—update 2013. Eur Urol. 2014;65:124–137.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.↵
    1. Mohler JL,
    2. Kantoff PW,
    3. Armstrong AJ,
    4. et al
    . Prostate cancer, version 2.2014. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2014;12:686–718.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.↵
    1. Afshar-Oromieh A,
    2. Zechmann CM,
    3. Malcher A,
    4. et al
    . Comparison of PET imaging with a 68 Ga-labelled PSMA ligand and 18 F-choline-based PET/CT for the diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41:11–20.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.↵
    1. Eiber M,
    2. Maurer T,
    3. Souvatzoglou M,
    4. et al
    . Evaluation of hybrid 68Ga-PSMA ligand PET/CT in 248 patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:668–674.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    1. Nanni C,
    2. Schiavina R,
    3. Brunocilla E,
    4. et al
    . 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT for the detection of prostate cancer relapse: a comparison to 11C-choline PET/CT. Clin Nucl Med. 2015;40:e386–e391.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.↵
    1. Schuster DM,
    2. Savir-Baruch B,
    3. Nieh PT,
    4. et al
    . Detection of recurrent prostate carcinoma with anti-1-amino-3-18F-fluorocyclobutane-1-carboxylic acid PET/CT and 111In–capromab pendetide SPECT/CT. Radiology. 2011;259:852–861.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.↵
    1. Perera M,
    2. Papa N,
    3. Christidis D,
    4. et al
    . Sensitivity, specificity, and predictors of positive 68Ga–prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography in advanced prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2016;70:926–937.
    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.↵
    1. Fendler WP,
    2. Eiber M,
    3. Beheshti M,
    4. et al
    . 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT: Joint EANM and SNMMI procedure guideline for prostate cancer imaging: version 1.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44:1014–1024.
    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.↵
    1. Sanli Y,
    2. Kuyumcu S,
    3. Sanli O,
    4. et al
    . Relationships between serum PSA levels, Gleason scores and results of 68Ga-PSMAPET/CT in patients with recurrent prostate cancer. Ann Nucl Med. 2017;31:709–717.
    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.↵
    The 2007 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection: ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP. 2007;37:1–332.
    OpenUrlPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.↵
    1. Ost P,
    2. Bossi A,
    3. Decaestecker K,
    4. et al
    . Metastasis-directed therapy of regional and distant recurrences after curative treatment of prostate cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol. 2015;67:852–863.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.↵
    1. Rigaud J,
    2. Tiguert R,
    3. Le Normand L,
    4. et al
    . Prognostic value of bone scan in patients with metastatic prostate cancer treated initially with androgen deprivation therapy. J Urol. 2002;168:1423–1426.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.↵
    1. Ceci F,
    2. Uprimny C,
    3. Nilica B,
    4. et al
    . 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT for restaging recurrent prostate cancer: which factors are associated with PET/CT detection rate? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42:1284–1294.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.↵
    1. Pyka T,
    2. Okamoto S,
    3. Dahlbender M,
    4. et al
    . Comparison of bone scintigraphy and 68Ga-PSMA PET for skeletal staging in prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43:2114–2121.
    OpenUrlGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.↵
    1. Wang C,
    2. Shen Y
    . Study on the distribution features of bone metastases in prostate cancer. Nucl Med Commun. 2012;33:379–383.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.↵
    1. Long MA,
    2. Husband J
    . Features of unusual metastases from prostate cancer. Br J Radiol. 1999;72:933–941.
    OpenUrlAbstractGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.↵
    1. Schwartz ED,
    2. Donahue FI,
    3. Bromson MS,
    4. Blaise JF
    . Metastatic prostate carcinoma to the foot with magnetic resonance imaging and pathologic correlation. Foot Ankle Int. 1998;19:594–597.
    OpenUrlPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    1. Agrawal S,
    2. Irvine A,
    3. Money-Kyrle J,
    4. Ellis BW
    . Isolated calcaneal metastasis from prostate cancer. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2008;90:W7–W9.
    OpenUrlPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    1. Barkow U,
    2. Weissbach L,
    3. Strohmeier A,
    4. Schöder H,
    5. Friedrich M
    . Solitary metastasis of prostate cancer in the tibia. Aktuelle Radiol. 1994;4:274–276.
    OpenUrlPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.↵
    1. Lee DK
    . Prostate cancer metastases to the leg, ankle, and foot. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2008;98:242–245.
    OpenUrlPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.↵
    1. Libson E,
    2. Bloom RA,
    3. Husband JE,
    4. Stoker DJ
    . Metastatic tumours of bones of the hand and foot. Skeletal Radiol. 1987;16:387–392.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.↵
    1. Zindrick MR,
    2. Young MP,
    3. Daley RJ,
    4. Light TR
    . Metastatic tumors of the foot: case report and literature review. Clin Orthop. 1982;219–225.
    Google Scholar
  26. 26.↵
    1. Coleman RE
    . Skeletal complications of malignancy. Cancer. 1997;80:1588–1594.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.↵
    1. Coleman RE
    . Metastatic bone disease: clinical features, pathophysiology and treatment strategies. Cancer Treat Rev. 2001;27:165–176.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • Received for publication December 2, 2018.
  • Accepted for publication February 20, 2019.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology: 47 (3)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
Vol. 47, Issue 3
September 1, 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools
Share
Clinical Impact of Lower-Limb Imaging in 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for Patients with Prostate Cancer
Duygu Has Simsek, Yasemin Sanli, Serkan Kuyumcu, Muge Nur Engin, Fikret Buyukkaya, Emre Demirci
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Sep 2019, 47 (3) 233-237; DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.118.224303
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Total-Body 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for Bone Metastasis Detection in Prostate Cancer Patients: Potential Impact on Bone Scan Guidelines
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Early 10-Minute Postinjection [18F]F-FAPI-42 uEXPLORER Total-Body PET/CT Scanning Protocol for Staging Lung Cancer Using HYPER Iterative Reconstruction
  • Single- Versus Dual-Time-Point Imaging for Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloid Using 99mTc-Pyrophosphate
  • Software Discrepancies in Radionuclide-Derived Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction
Show more Imaging

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • prostate cancer
  • 68Ga-PSMA
  • PET/CT
  • lower limb
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire
Alerts for this Article
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email this Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Clinical Impact of Lower-Limb Imaging in 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for Patients with Prostate Cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology web site.
Citation Tools
Clinical Impact of Lower-Limb Imaging in 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for Patients with Prostate Cancer
Duygu Has Simsek, Yasemin Sanli, Serkan Kuyumcu, Muge Nur Engin, Fikret Buyukkaya, Emre Demirci
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Sep 2019, 47 (3) 233-237; DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.118.224303

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience

By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies.