Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
      • JNMT Supplement
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Continuing Education
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Contact
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Continuing Education
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Contact
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Follow SNMMI on Twitter
  • Visit SNMMI on Facebook
  • Join SNMMI on LinkedIn
  • Subscribe to JNMT RSS feeds
Research ArticleImaging

Influence of Statistical Fluctuation on Reproducibility and Accuracy of SUVmax and SUVpeak: A Phantom Study

Go Akamatsu, Yasuhiko Ikari, Hiroyuki Nishida, Tomoyuki Nishio, Akihito Ohnishi, Akira Maebatake, Masayuki Sasaki and Michio Senda
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology September 2015, 43 (3) 222-226; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.115.161745
Go Akamatsu
1Division of Molecular Imaging, Institute of Biomedical Research and Innovation, Kobe, Japan; and
2Department of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yasuhiko Ikari
1Division of Molecular Imaging, Institute of Biomedical Research and Innovation, Kobe, Japan; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hiroyuki Nishida
1Division of Molecular Imaging, Institute of Biomedical Research and Innovation, Kobe, Japan; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tomoyuki Nishio
1Division of Molecular Imaging, Institute of Biomedical Research and Innovation, Kobe, Japan; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Akihito Ohnishi
1Division of Molecular Imaging, Institute of Biomedical Research and Innovation, Kobe, Japan; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Akira Maebatake
2Department of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Masayuki Sasaki
2Department of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michio Senda
1Division of Molecular Imaging, Institute of Biomedical Research and Innovation, Kobe, Japan; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Information

vol. 43 no. 3 222-226
DOI 
https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.115.161745
PubMed 
26271802

Published By 
Society of Nuclear Medicine
Print ISSN 
0091-4916
Online ISSN 
1535-5675
History 
  • Received for publication June 1, 2015
  • Accepted for publication July 21, 2015
  • Published online September 3, 2015.

Article Versions

  • previous version (August 13, 2015 - 11:17).
  • You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Copyright & Usage 
© 2015 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.

Author Information

  1. Go Akamatsu1,2,
  2. Yasuhiko Ikari1,
  3. Hiroyuki Nishida1,
  4. Tomoyuki Nishio1,
  5. Akihito Ohnishi1,
  6. Akira Maebatake2,
  7. Masayuki Sasaki2 and
  8. Michio Senda1
  1. 1Division of Molecular Imaging, Institute of Biomedical Research and Innovation, Kobe, Japan; and
  2. 2Department of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
  1. For correspondence or reprints contact: Michio Senda, Division of Molecular Imaging, Institute of Biomedical Research and Innovation, 2-2, Minatojima-Minamimachi, Chuo-ku, 650-0047, Kobe, Japan. E-mail:senda{at}fbri.org
View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Cited By...

  • 57 Citations
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Impact of PET/CT system, reconstruction protocol, data analysis method, and repositioning on PET/CT precision: An experimental evaluation using an oncology and brain phantom
    Syahir Mansor, Elisabeth Pfaehler, Dennis Heijtel, Martin A. Lodge, Ronald Boellaard, Maqsood Yaqub
    Medical Physics 2017 44 12
  • Impact of PET acquisition durations on image quality and lesion detectability in whole-body 68Ga-PSMA PET-MRI
    Benjamin Noto, Florian Büther, Katharina Auf der Springe, Nemanja Avramovic, Walter Heindel, Michael Schäfers, Thomas Allkemper, Lars Stegger
    EJNMMI Research 2017 7 1
  • Phantom and clinical evaluation of bone SPECT/CT image reconstruction with xSPECT algorithm
    Noriaki Miyaji, Kenta Miwa, Ayaka Tokiwa, Hajime Ichikawa, Takashi Terauchi, Mitsuru Koizumi, Masahisa Onoguchi
    EJNMMI Research 2020 10 1
  • 18F-FDG PET/CT Quantitative Parameters and Texture Analysis Effectively Differentiate Endometrial Precancerous Lesion and Early-Stage Carcinoma
    Tong Wang, Hongzan Sun, Yan Guo, Lue Zou
    Molecular Imaging 2019 18
  • Evaluation of 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters for reflection of aggressiveness and prediction of prognosis in early-stage cervical cancer
    Le Zhang, Hongzan Sun, Siyao Du, Weina Xu, Jun Xin, Qiyong Guo
    Nuclear Medicine Communications 2018 39 11
  • A better prediction of progression‐free survival in diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma by a prognostic model consisting of baseline TLG and %ΔSUVmax
    Yi‐Yang Zhang, Le Song, Mei‐Xin Zhao, Kai Hu
    Cancer Medicine 2019 8 11
  • FDG PET/CT of the non‐malignant liver in an increasingly obese world population
    Georgia Keramida, A. Michael Peters
    Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging 2020 40 5
  • Diagnostic implications of a small-voxel reconstruction for loco-regional lymph node characterization in breast cancer patients using FDG-PET/CT
    Daniëlle Koopman, Jorn A. van Dalen, Hester Arkies, Ad H. J. Oostdijk, Anne Brecht Francken, Jos Bart, Cornelis H. Slump, Siert Knollema, Pieter L. Jager
    EJNMMI Research 2018 8 1
  • Semiquantitative analysis using standardized uptake value in 123I-FP-CIT SPECT/CT
    Akira Toriihara, Hiromitsu Daisaki, Akihiro Yamaguchi, Makoto Kobayashi, Shogo Furukawa, Katsuya Yoshida, Jun Isogai, Ukihide Tateishi
    Clinical Imaging 2018 52
  • Comparison of SUVmax and SUVpeak based segmentation to determine primary lung tumour volume on FDG PET-CT correlated with pathology data
    Susan Mercieca, José Belderbos, Judith van Loon, Kenneth Gilhuijs, Peter Julyan, Marcel van Herk
    Radiotherapy and Oncology 2018 129 2

Article usage

Article usage: August 2015 to October 2023

AbstractFullPdf
Aug 20155808
Sep 2015289426
Oct 201523226
Nov 201517669
Dec 201512626
Jan 20164667
Feb 20169715
Mar 20166047
Apr 20165801
May 20167233
Jun 20164601
Jul 20169402
Aug 201612029
Sep 20165888
Oct 2016984024
Nov 2016595316
Dec 20161258512
Jan 2017743027
Feb 2017774511
Mar 2017542717
Apr 201729108
May 2017421913
Jun 2017301710
Jul 2017462612
Aug 2017352918
Sep 2017292118
Oct 2017242710
Nov 201723169
Dec 2017221715
Jan 2018511514
Feb 201818188
Mar 2018191917
Apr 20183766
May 201819711
Jun 20181263
Jul 201820103
Aug 20181281
Sep 201830013
Oct 201821911
Nov 201815713
Dec 20187228
Jan 20198813
Feb 20197108
Mar 201916511
Apr 201915819
May 2019726
Jun 2019141115
Jul 201917137
Aug 201913312
Sep 20191578
Oct 2019252110
Nov 20191377
Dec 20191067
Jan 2020779
Feb 2020785
Mar 20201179
Apr 202015128
May 20205812
Jun 2020687
Jul 2020949
Aug 20201089
Sep 2020121016
Oct 2020151012
Nov 202014811
Dec 2020111613
Jan 202151617
Feb 202181618
Mar 202143616
Apr 2021131913
May 202183418
Jun 202163614
Jul 202153432
Aug 202162016
Sep 202172312
Oct 202133243
Nov 2021112417
Dec 2021164315
Jan 2022132913
Feb 2022123519
Mar 202293021
Apr 2022123617
May 2022126126
Jun 2022121913
Jul 20227108
Aug 202231413
Sep 202241013
Oct 202262617
Nov 2022102917
Dec 202263814
Jan 202333612
Feb 202344112
Mar 2023107013
Apr 20235239
May 202351813
Jun 202342016
Jul 202351010
Aug 202331410
Sep 202372516
Oct 202372015
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology: 43 (3)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
Vol. 43, Issue 3
September 1, 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Influence of Statistical Fluctuation on Reproducibility and Accuracy of SUVmax and SUVpeak: A Phantom Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology web site.
Citation Tools
Influence of Statistical Fluctuation on Reproducibility and Accuracy of SUVmax and SUVpeak: A Phantom Study
Go Akamatsu, Yasuhiko Ikari, Hiroyuki Nishida, Tomoyuki Nishio, Akihito Ohnishi, Akira Maebatake, Masayuki Sasaki, Michio Senda
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Sep 2015, 43 (3) 222-226; DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.115.161745

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Influence of Statistical Fluctuation on Reproducibility and Accuracy of SUVmax and SUVpeak: A Phantom Study
Go Akamatsu, Yasuhiko Ikari, Hiroyuki Nishida, Tomoyuki Nishio, Akihito Ohnishi, Akira Maebatake, Masayuki Sasaki, Michio Senda
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Sep 2015, 43 (3) 222-226; DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.115.161745
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • SUVs Are Adequate Measures of Lesional 18F-DCFPyL Uptake in Patients with Low Prostate Cancer Disease Burden
  • Protocols for Harmonized Quantification and Noise Reduction in Low-Dose Oncologic 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Simulated Fewer-Angle SPECT/CT Imaging Protocol for Parathyroid Adenoma
  • Vapocoolant Analgesia for Breast Lymphoscintigraphy: A Prospective Clinical Trial
  • Imaging Pathway of a Pediatric Patient with Succinate Dehydrogenase B-Deficient Paraganglioma
Show more Imaging

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • SUVmax
  • SUVpeak
  • FDG PET
  • statistical fluctuation
  • reproducibility
SNMMI

© 2023 Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

Powered by HighWire