Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
      • JNMT Supplement
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Watch or Listen to JNMT Podcast
  • Visit SNMMI on Facebook
  • Join SNMMI on LinkedIn
  • Follow SNMMI on Twitter
  • Subscribe to JNMT RSS feeds
Research ArticleIMAGING

Comparative Evaluation of 24-Hour Thyroid 131I Uptake Between γ Camera–Based Method Using Medium-Energy Collimator and Standard Uptake Probe–Based Method

Biju K. Menon, Ramesh D. Rao, Amit Abhyankar, M.G. Ramakrishna Rajan and Sandip Basu
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology September 2014, 42 (3) 194-197; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.114.139162
Biju K. Menon
Radiation Medicine Centre, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Tata Memorial Hospital Annexe, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ramesh D. Rao
Radiation Medicine Centre, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Tata Memorial Hospital Annexe, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amit Abhyankar
Radiation Medicine Centre, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Tata Memorial Hospital Annexe, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M.G. Ramakrishna Rajan
Radiation Medicine Centre, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Tata Memorial Hospital Annexe, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sandip Basu
Radiation Medicine Centre, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Tata Memorial Hospital Annexe, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Scintiscan of camera-based uptake in 45-y-old man with diffuse thyrotoxic goiter. Probe-based 24-h 131I uptake was 74.3%, whereas camera-based uptake was 75.9%.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    Scintiscan of 24-h 131I uptake in 45-y-old woman with nonthyrotoxic multinodular goiter. Probe-based 24-h 131I uptake was 23.17%, whereas camera-based uptake was 21.7%.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    Graphs of probe-based and camera-based uptake calculated in all patients. Neck uptake values calculated by probe and camera are plotted against individual patients in thyrotoxic group (top) and nonthyrotoxic group (bottom). Correlation coefficient of 0.990659 was obtained between the 2 methods when all patients were considered together.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Data for Nonthyrotoxic Patients

    Uptake (%)
    Patient no.SexProbeCameraDifference
    1F2.641.910.73
    2F7.24.92.3
    3F9.538.11.43
    4F12.48.234.17
    5F15.3713.561.81
    6F16.414.082.32
    7F18.317.041.26
    8F20.0119.810.2
    9M20.522.7−2.2
    10F22.3621.70.66
    11F23.1721.711.46
    12F2423.90.1
    13F28.327.041.26
    14F28.3526.41.95
    15M29.537.9−8.4
    16M30.3326.73.63
    17F31.828.223.58
    18F32.732.70
    19F33.334.8−1.5
    20F34.29322.29
    21F38.4936.841.65
    Mean26.325.7
    SD9.710.5
    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Data for Thyrotoxic Patients

    Uptake (%)
    Patient no.SexProbeCameraDifference
    22M40.1336.893.24
    23F4138.52.5
    24F41.337.044.26
    25F4550.4−5.4
    26F46.1640.116.05
    27F5258−6
    28F52.453.7−1.3
    29F5457−3
    30F55.0951.53.59
    31F55.1854.90.28
    32F58.7455.443.3
    33M59.2355.793.44
    34F61.58592.58
    35F62557
    36F6657.78.3
    37F67.7866.521.26
    38M69.9869.70.28
    39F70.269.111.09
    40F7176−5
    41F72.4274.77−2.35
    42F73.775.59−1.89
    43M74.375.93−1.63
    44F7580.9−5.9
    45M75.686.7−11.1
    46M76.5760.5
    47F76.67688.67
    48F76.9733.9
    49M77716
    50F78.0676.111.95
    51F79.182.5−3.4
    52M79.276.043.16
    53M80.1475.174.97
    54F80.975.35.6
    55F82.484.7−2.3
    56F8691.8−5.8
    57F8676.69.4
    58M87.2483.673.57
    59M88.891.7−2.9
    60M9085.544.46
    61M9390.72.3
    62F94.0493.041
    63F94.58895.58
    64F95.2193.22.01
    65F96.8951.8
    66F97.295.91.3
    Mean71.970.67
    SD16.2216.62
    • Paired t test value, 0.007325.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology: 42 (3)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
Vol. 42, Issue 3
September 1, 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparative Evaluation of 24-Hour Thyroid 131I Uptake Between γ Camera–Based Method Using Medium-Energy Collimator and Standard Uptake Probe–Based Method
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology web site.
Citation Tools
Comparative Evaluation of 24-Hour Thyroid 131I Uptake Between γ Camera–Based Method Using Medium-Energy Collimator and Standard Uptake Probe–Based Method
Biju K. Menon, Ramesh D. Rao, Amit Abhyankar, M.G. Ramakrishna Rajan, Sandip Basu
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Sep 2014, 42 (3) 194-197; DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.114.139162

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Comparative Evaluation of 24-Hour Thyroid 131I Uptake Between γ Camera–Based Method Using Medium-Energy Collimator and Standard Uptake Probe–Based Method
Biju K. Menon, Ramesh D. Rao, Amit Abhyankar, M.G. Ramakrishna Rajan, Sandip Basu
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Sep 2014, 42 (3) 194-197; DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.114.139162
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Findings for Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma by {gamma}-Camera-Based and Uptake-Probe-Based Methods in Comparison with Diagnostic Radioiodine Scanning
  • {gamma}-Camera-Based Method for Measuring the {gamma}-Count from 131I Capsules: An Alternative to the Thyroid Uptake Probe
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Early 10-Minute Postinjection [18F]F-FAPI-42 uEXPLORER Total-Body PET/CT Scanning Protocol for Staging Lung Cancer Using HYPER Iterative Reconstruction
  • Single- Versus Dual-Time-Point Imaging for Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloid Using 99mTc-Pyrophosphate
  • Robustness of 18F-FDG PET Radiomic Features in Lung Cancer: Impact of Advanced Reconstruction Algorithm
Show more Imaging

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • 131I
  • camera based uptake
  • Thyroid uptake probe
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire