Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
      • JNMT Supplement
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Continuing Education
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Contact
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Continuing Education
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Contact
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Follow SNMMI on Twitter
  • Visit SNMMI on Facebook
  • Join SNMMI on LinkedIn
  • Subscribe to JNMT RSS feeds
OtherBRIEF COMMUNICATIONS

Is the Physical Decay Correction of the 18F-FDG Input Function in Dynamic PET Imaging Justified?

Eric Laffon, Olivier Barret, Roger Marthan and Dominique Ducassou
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology June 2009, 37 (2) 111-113; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.108.060350
Eric Laffon
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Olivier Barret
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roger Marthan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dominique Ducassou
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • FIGURE 1. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1. 

    Theoretic free 18F-FDG blood time–activity curve and trapped 18F-FDG tissue time–activity curve included in compartments A and B, respectively, when no 18F decay correction is applied (solid line) and when 18F decay correction is applied (dashed line). a.u. = arbitrary unit.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology: 37 (2)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
Vol. 37, Issue 2
June 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Is the Physical Decay Correction of the 18F-FDG Input Function in Dynamic PET Imaging Justified?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology web site.
Citation Tools
Is the Physical Decay Correction of the 18F-FDG Input Function in Dynamic PET Imaging Justified?
Eric Laffon, Olivier Barret, Roger Marthan, Dominique Ducassou
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Jun 2009, 37 (2) 111-113; DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.108.060350

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Is the Physical Decay Correction of the 18F-FDG Input Function in Dynamic PET Imaging Justified?
Eric Laffon, Olivier Barret, Roger Marthan, Dominique Ducassou
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Jun 2009, 37 (2) 111-113; DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.108.060350
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
  • Development of PET/CT and PET/MRI Patient-Information Videos in Collaboration with Patients Previously Treated for Cancer
  • Introducing Tech TIME: Online Quick References for Nuclear Medicine Technologists
Show more Brief Communications

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2023 Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

Powered by HighWire