Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
      • JNMT Supplement
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Continuing Education
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Contact
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Continuing Education
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Contact
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Follow SNMMI on Twitter
  • Visit SNMMI on Facebook
  • Join SNMMI on LinkedIn
  • Subscribe to JNMT RSS feeds
OtherIMAGING

Inter- and Intraobserver Variability of 99mTc-DMSA Renal Scintigraphy: Impact of Oblique Views

Meltem Caglar, Pınar Özgen Kıratlı and Erdem Karabulut
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology June 2007, 35 (2) 96-99; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.106.036111
Meltem Caglar
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pınar Özgen Kıratlı
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Erdem Karabulut
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

99mTc-Dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) scintigraphy is a frequently used diagnostic test to assess the presence and severity of cortical damage. The aim of this study is to investigate the variability in the interpretation of 99mTc-DMSA scans, evaluate the usefulness of oblique images, and assess their impact on scan interpretation. Methods: Two experienced nuclear medicine physicians independently interpreted 100 99mTc-DMSA scans (197 kidneys) 4 times. Interpretation was twice based on posterior projection images and twice based on posterior and posterior oblique projection images. For each kidney, the observers had to choose between the following results: normal, abnormal, and indeterminate. The indices of variability used were the percentage of agreement, κ-statistic, and marginal homogeneity. Results: Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility (κ-values) varied between 0.683 and 0.708 and between 0.609 and 0.671, respectively, for posterior images. Disagreement in 99mTc-DMSA scan interpretation occurred in 18% of kidneys within observers and in 21% of kidneys between observers when only posterior images were used. Oblique views changed the interpretation in 14% and 11.5% of kidneys for the first and second observers, respectively. The use of oblique views increased the agreement rate within and between observers (κ-values, 0.725–0.812 and 0.768–0.732, respectively; mean agreement, 86.5 and 87.25, respectively). Conclusion: Oblique views were found useful in approximately 13% of kidneys and affected inter- and intraobserver variability. Our results suggest that oblique views should be used routinely in children with clinically suspected urinary tract infection to reliably interpret images.

  • DMSA
  • scintigraphy
  • observer variability

Scintigraphy with 99mTc-dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) is used to identify children who have renal cortical damage, and clinical decisions are often influenced by the scan results (1–5). Although procedure guidelines suggest that optimal imaging should include right and left posterior oblique views in addition to posterior images, the utility of oblique views has been questioned (6). There are also not enough reliable data in the literature on the utility of oblique views in the interpretation of scintigraphic reports.

This work was undertaken to evaluate the level of inter- and intraobserver variability in 99mTc-DMSA scintigraphy and to identify the impact of posterior oblique views on scan interpretation in the pediatric population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 197 kidneys, which were randomly selected from our database, were retrospectively evaluated. Patient age varied between 3 mo and 17 y. All scans were displayed on gray-scale, clear-based, hard-copy radiographic films. Static renal scintigraphy was performed 3 h after the administration of 99mTc-DMSA. The dose was scaled on a body weight basis using an adult dose of 185 MBq (5 mCi) (range, 37–185 MBq [1–5 mCi]). Scintigraphic images (128 × 128 matrix) were acquired over 5 min from posterior and posterior oblique projections using a γ-camera equipped with a high-resolution collimator and using a 1.23 zoom factor.

Patients with congenital malformations, renal failure, and low-quality images were excluded from the study.

All films were viewed by 2 experienced nuclear medicine specialists. Apart from being informed that urinary tract infection was the indication for 99mTc-DMSA scintigraphy, the nuclear medicine physicians were given no other clinical information. Films were read on 4 separate occasions—all independently to ensure that no bias was introduced. The first interpretation was based on the posterior images. The second was based on both the posterior and the posterior oblique images. The third, 2 wk later, was a reinterpretation of the same cases in the same sequence. Images were classified as normal, abnormal, or indeterminate (Figs. 1–3⇓). 99mTc-DMSA scan findings were defined as abnormal if a defect in renal contour or an area of photon deficiency was present in the renal cortex.

FIGURE 1. 
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1. 

Normal findings on planar 99mTc-DMSA scintigraphy. LPO = left posterior oblique; RPO = right posterior oblique.

FIGURE 2. 
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2. 

Abnormal findings on 99mTc-DMSA scintigraphy. Posterior, left posterior oblique (LPO), and right posterior oblique (RPO) images reveal slight enlargement of left kidney, with cortical defects. Although right kidney appears normal on posterior image, cortical defect is seen in lower pole on RPO view.

FIGURE 3. 
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3. 

99mTc-DMSA scintigraphy showing small left kidney with parenchymal scarring. Right side is considered indeterminate on posterior and posterior oblique views because of midzone impression seen in upper pole–lower pole junction suggestive of duplex kidney. Because no evidence of duplex kidney was present, right kidney was considered indeterminate for acute pyelonephritis or cortical scar. LPO = left posterior oblique; RPO = right posterior oblique.

Variability in the interpretation of 197 kidneys was assessed from the readings of 2 nuclear medicine physicians. The percentage of agreement and κ-statistics were used to measure inter- and intraobserver variability. In all calculations, reproducibility was estimated on the basis of complete agreement between observers where the number of possible answers was 3 (normal, abnormal, and indeterminate). The percentage of agreement was defined as an index that gave a good measure of how well any posterior distribution agreed with the prior distribution. This rather simple statistic has the merit of being easy to understand. A measure generally thought to be more robust than the simple percentage agreement calculation is Cohen's κ-coefficient (7), because it adjusts for agreement attributable to chance and can range from −1 to +1, the latter representing perfect agreement. The κ-statistic was used to measure interobserver variability (inconsistency of interpretation among different physicians) and intraobserver variability (the failure of a physician to be consistent in independent readings of the same scan). In practical terms, values above 0.61 were taken to indicate a high standard of agreement and a level at which the data could be accepted as reproducible (8).

Scan results were compared using a marginal homogeneity test for matched pairs. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Table 1 shows the results given by 2 observers for 197 kidneys. Adding oblique images changed the results for the first and second observers in 32 kidneys (16%) and 27 kidneys (14%), respectively, in the first interpretation and in 24 kidneys (12%) and 20 kidneys (10%), respectively, in the second interpretation. The proportion of indeterminate results was significantly reduced when oblique images were used for interpretation (P = 0.023, P = 000, P = 0.036), except for the second observer in the second interpretation (P = 0.307).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Impact of Oblique Images for DMSA Scan Interpretation

The κ-statistics for inter- and intraobserver variability is given in Tables 2 and 3. The reproducibility of image interpretation was good and was slightly better when posterior oblique images were used. When only posterior images were used, complete agreement was achieved in 151 kidneys (77%) (κ = 0.609) in the first interpretation and in 159 kidneys (81%) (κ = 0.671) in the second. When both the posterior and the posterior oblique views were used, complete agreement was achieved in 173 kidneys (88%) (κ = 0.768) and 167 kidneys (85%) (κ = 0.732) in the first and second interpretations, respectively.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2

κ-Statistics for Intraobserver Variability of DMSA Scintigraphy

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3

κ-Statistics for Interobserver Variability of DMSA Scintigraphy

DISCUSSION

Although renal cortical scintigraphy with 99mTc-DMSA is widely used, primarily for the evaluation of renal parenchymal damage, conflicting opinions have been expressed about its reproducibility (9–13). Some investigators advocate the addition of pinhole images and SPECT (14); however, motion artifacts due to the long acquisition time may be a problem (15). Recent results demonstrated that high-resolution planar imaging, pinhole imaging, and SPECT can provide similar results in demonstrating renal cortical defects (16).

This study demonstrated a high level of agreement in the interpretation of 99mTc-DMSA scans showing urinary tract infection. The κ-values varied between 0.683 and 0.708 for intraobserver variability and between 0.609 and 0.671 for interobserver variability, which was classified as good when only posterior views were used. With the addition of oblique projections, the κ-values improved slightly (0.725–0.812 and 0.768–0.732, respectively). A higher level of intraobserver consistency suggested that observers are of clearer mind about the definition of renal parenchymal damage. Oblique views, when used with posterior images, provide a firm basis for clinical decision making, especially in patients who have photon-deficient areas due to dilated calices or questionable contours. The interpretation of 99mTc-DMSA scintigraphy from only the posterior view, compared with oblique views also, will underestimate the number of normal scans. This effect is relevant in patients with urinary tract infection, because a strategy to perform voiding cystourethrography in only patients with renal lesions has been proposed (5).

The degree of reproducibility may also depend on the severity and extent of lesions. Abnormalities seen during the acute phase of infection may be more striking and less challenging. In this study, the scans were randomly selected and represented the routine clinical workload. Areas of parenchymal damage appeared as hypoactive, with or without deformity of the contours. Difficulties remain in the interpretation of subtle cases and are related to the lack of an established definition for anatomic variants.

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that technically well-performed studies on a planar high-resolution collimator can yield valuable information in children with either clinically suspected acute pyelonephritis or renal scarring. In our series, at least 10% of patients with urinary tract infection could have been sent for voiding cystourethrography on the basis of equivocal 99mTc-DMSA results. Although this study was limited by the lack of a standard of reference against which to judge the performance of both views, our results indicated that the lesions were more confidently diagnosed on oblique images.

Footnotes

  • COPYRIGHT © 2007 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Gordon I. Indications for technetium-99m dimercaptosuccinic acid scan in children. J Urol. 1987;137:464–467.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. 2.
    Gleeson FV, Gordon I. Imaging in urinary tract infection. Arch Dis Child. 1991;66:1282–1283.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.
    Goldraich NP, Goldraich IH. Update on dimercaptosuccinic acid renal scanning in children with urinary tract infection. Pediatr Nephrol. 1995;9:221–226.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.
    Rushton HG. The evaluation of acute pyelonephritis and renal scarring with technetium 99m-dimercaptosuccinic acid renal scintigraphy: evolving concepts and future directions. Pediatr Nephrol. 1997;11:108–120.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    Hansson S, Dhamey M, Sigström O, et al. Dimercaptosuccinic acid scintigraphy instead of voiding cystourethrography for infants with urinary tract infection. J Urol. 2004;172:1071–1074.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    Mannes F, Bultynck E, Van Roijen N, Van Der Mauten L, Piepsz A, Ham H. Utility of posterior oblique views in Tc-99m DMSA renal scintigraphy. J Nucl Med Technol. 2003;31:72–73.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    Cohen JA. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960;20:37–46.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    Brennan P, Silman A. Statistical methods for assessing observer variability in clinical measures. BMJ. 1992;304:1491–1494.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    Piepsz A, Clarke SEM, Mackenzie R, Gordon I. A study on the interobserver variability in reporting on Tc-99m DMSA scintigraphy [abstract]. Eur J Nucl Med. 1993;20:194.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.
    Patel K, Charron M, Hoberman A, Brown ML, Rogers KD. Intra- and interobserver variability in interpretation of DMSA scan using a set of standardized criteria. Pediatr Radiol. 1993;23:506–509.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.
    Everaert H, Flamen P, Franken PR, Peeters P, Bossuyt A, Piepsz A. 99Tcm-DMSA renal scintigraphy for acute pyelonephritis in adults: planar and/or SPET imaging? Nucl Med Commun. 1996;17:884–889.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. 12.
    Gacinovic S, Buscombe J, Costa DC, Hilson A, Bomanji J. Ell PJ. Interobserver agreement in the interpretation of Tc-99m DMSA renal studies. Nucl Med Commun. 1996;17:596–602.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    De Sadeleer C, Tondeur M, Melis K, et al. A multicenter trial on interobserver reproducibility in reporting on Tc-99m DMSA planar scintigraphy: a Belgian survey. J Nucl Med. 2000;41:23–26.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    Tarkington MA, Fildes RD, Levin K, Zeissman H, Harkness B, Gibbons MD. High resolution single photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT) 99m technetium-dimercapto-succinic acid renal imaging: a state of the art technique. J Urol. 1990;144:598–600.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    Rossleigh M. Renal cortical scintigraphy and diuresis renography in infants and children. J Nucl Med. 2001;42:91–95.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    Applegate K, Connolly L, Davis R, Zurakowski D, Treves ST. A prospective comparison of high-resolution planar, pinhole, and triple-detector SPECT for the detection of renal cortical defects. Clin Nucl Med. 1997;22:673–678.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  • Received for publication August 27, 2006.
  • Accepted for publication February 12, 2007.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology: 35 (2)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
Vol. 35, Issue 2
June 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Inter- and Intraobserver Variability of 99mTc-DMSA Renal Scintigraphy: Impact of Oblique Views
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology web site.
Citation Tools
Inter- and Intraobserver Variability of 99mTc-DMSA Renal Scintigraphy: Impact of Oblique Views
Meltem Caglar, Pınar Özgen Kıratlı, Erdem Karabulut
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Jun 2007, 35 (2) 96-99; DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.106.036111

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Inter- and Intraobserver Variability of 99mTc-DMSA Renal Scintigraphy: Impact of Oblique Views
Meltem Caglar, Pınar Özgen Kıratlı, Erdem Karabulut
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Jun 2007, 35 (2) 96-99; DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.106.036111
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Reliability of a Scoring System for Qualitative Evaluation of Lymphoscintigraphy of the Lower Extremities
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Improving 90Y PET Scan Image Quality Through Optimized Reconstruction Algorithms
  • Evaluation of Data-Driven Respiration Gating in Continuous Bed Motion in Lung Lesions
  • Optimization of the Attenuation Coefficient for Chang Attenuation Correction in 123I Brain Perfusion SPECT
Show more Imaging

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2023 Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

Powered by HighWire