Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
      • JNMT Supplement
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Watch or Listen to JNMT Podcast
  • Visit SNMMI on Facebook
  • Join SNMMI on LinkedIn
  • Follow SNMMI on Twitter
  • Subscribe to JNMT RSS feeds
OtherIMAGING

Gated 99mTc-Tetrofosmin and 18F-FDG Studies: A Comparison of Single-Acquisition and Separate-Acquisition Protocols

Robert A. Pagnanelli, Michael W. Hanson, Timothy Turkington, R. Edward Coleman and Salvador Borges-Neto
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology December 2002, 30 (4) 175-178;
Robert A. Pagnanelli
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael W. Hanson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Timothy Turkington
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. Edward Coleman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Salvador Borges-Neto
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Linear regression plot demonstrates strong correlation between 99mTc-TET gated SPECT ejection fraction using single-acquisition protocol (TETRO[S] GSPECT EF) and 18F-FDG gated SPECT ejection fraction using single-acquisition protocol (FDG[S] GSPECT EF).

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    Linear regression plot demonstrates strong correlation between 99mTc-TET gated SPECT ejection fraction using dual-acquisition protocol (TETRO[D] GSPECT EF) and 18F-FDG gated SPECT ejection fraction using dual-acquisition protocol (FDG[D] GSPECT EF).

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    Vertical long-axis slices from 99mTc-TET (first row) and 18F-FDG (second row) studies of same patient using dual-acquisition protocol (A) and single-acquisition protocol (B). Inferior wall perfusion defect (arrow) but viable myocardium is seen on dual-acquisition 18F-FDG study, but perfusion abnormalities (arrow) are underestimated on single-acquisition 99mTc-TET study, likely related to downscatter from 18F 511-keV photons.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Comparison Between DISA and DIDA 99mTc Studies

    DISADIDA
    NormalMildModerateSevere
    Normal36982
    Mild86124
    Moderate631312
    Severe2134
    • Data are numbers of segments.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Comparison Between DISA and DIDA 18F-FDG Studies

    DISADIDA
    NormalMildModerateSevere
    Normal8052
    Mild543
    Moderate26127
    Severe21423
    • Data are numbers of segments.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology: 30 (4)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
Vol. 30, Issue 4
December 1, 2002
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Gated 99mTc-Tetrofosmin and 18F-FDG Studies: A Comparison of Single-Acquisition and Separate-Acquisition Protocols
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology web site.
Citation Tools
Gated 99mTc-Tetrofosmin and 18F-FDG Studies: A Comparison of Single-Acquisition and Separate-Acquisition Protocols
Robert A. Pagnanelli, Michael W. Hanson, Timothy Turkington, R. Edward Coleman, Salvador Borges-Neto
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Dec 2002, 30 (4) 175-178;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Gated 99mTc-Tetrofosmin and 18F-FDG Studies: A Comparison of Single-Acquisition and Separate-Acquisition Protocols
Robert A. Pagnanelli, Michael W. Hanson, Timothy Turkington, R. Edward Coleman, Salvador Borges-Neto
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Dec 2002, 30 (4) 175-178;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Development of a 2-Layer Double-Pump Dynamic Cardiac Phantom
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Early 10-Minute Postinjection [18F]F-FAPI-42 uEXPLORER Total-Body PET/CT Scanning Protocol for Staging Lung Cancer Using HYPER Iterative Reconstruction
  • Single- Versus Dual-Time-Point Imaging for Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloid Using 99mTc-Pyrophosphate
  • Does Arthrography Improve Accuracy of SPECT/CT for Diagnosis of Aseptic Loosening in Patients with Painful Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis
Show more Imaging

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire