Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
      • JNMT Supplement
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Watch or Listen to JNMT Podcast
  • Visit SNMMI on Facebook
  • Join SNMMI on LinkedIn
  • Follow SNMMI on Twitter
  • Subscribe to JNMT RSS feeds
Imaging

GFR Determination by a Modification of the Gates Method: The Conventional Renal Examination with a Semi-Automated GFR Measurement

Erol M. Beytas, Sharon M. Hamblen, Michael W. Hanson and F. Dever Thomas
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology December 1990, 18 (4) 256-260;
Erol M. Beytas
Division of Nuclear Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina and Division of Nuclear Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical Center, Syracuse, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sharon M. Hamblen
Division of Nuclear Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina and Division of Nuclear Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical Center, Syracuse, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael W. Hanson
Division of Nuclear Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina and Division of Nuclear Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical Center, Syracuse, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
F. Dever Thomas
Division of Nuclear Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina and Division of Nuclear Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical Center, Syracuse, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The conventional radionuclide renal examination using a 10–20-mCi dose of technetium-99m (99mTc) DTPA (Pentetate), conducted over a 30–60-min duration, does not accommodate the Gates method for GFR determination. Simple modifications to the Gates technique will, however, permit a GFR determination to be made without sacrificing the components of a complete conventional renal examination, and will not significantly alter the technologist’s examination routine or time commitment. These modifications allow the Gates method to be used on virtually any gamma camera/collimator combination with an accompanying computer system, dose calibrator, and a lead slab syringe attenuator. With the modifications, GFR determinations can be obtained using doses of tracer as high as 10–20 mCi, while eliminating the direct gamma camera counting of the residual activity in the postinjection syringe. The net injected syringe counts are calculated using the gamma camera counts from the preinjection syringe attenuated through lead and the dose calibrator’s pre- and postinjection measurements of activity to determine the fraction of injected counts from the measured syringe dose. Excellent results are obtained when the gamma camera counts of the syringe activity using the original Gates method are compared to the counts derived from the modified technique using the lead slab attenuator and the dose calibrator (r > 0.99). We have found that this particular modification of the Gates method allows for a full examination by removing the dose and time restrictions imposed by the original Gates technique.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology: 18 (4)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
Vol. 18, Issue 4
December 1, 1990
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
GFR Determination by a Modification of the Gates Method: The Conventional Renal Examination with a Semi-Automated GFR Measurement
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology web site.
Citation Tools
GFR Determination by a Modification of the Gates Method: The Conventional Renal Examination with a Semi-Automated GFR Measurement
Erol M. Beytas, Sharon M. Hamblen, Michael W. Hanson, F. Dever Thomas
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Dec 1990, 18 (4) 256-260;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
GFR Determination by a Modification of the Gates Method: The Conventional Renal Examination with a Semi-Automated GFR Measurement
Erol M. Beytas, Sharon M. Hamblen, Michael W. Hanson, F. Dever Thomas
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Dec 1990, 18 (4) 256-260;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Early 10-Minute Postinjection [18F]F-FAPI-42 uEXPLORER Total-Body PET/CT Scanning Protocol for Staging Lung Cancer Using HYPER Iterative Reconstruction
  • Single- Versus Dual-Time-Point Imaging for Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloid Using 99mTc-Pyrophosphate
  • Does Arthrography Improve Accuracy of SPECT/CT for Diagnosis of Aseptic Loosening in Patients with Painful Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis
Show more Imaging

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire