Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
      • JNMT Supplement
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Watch or Listen to JNMT Podcast
  • Visit SNMMI on Facebook
  • Join SNMMI on LinkedIn
  • Follow SNMMI on Twitter
  • Subscribe to JNMT RSS feeds
Research ArticleImaging

Assessing PET Parameters in Oncologic 18F-FDG Studies

Ismet Sarikaya and Ali Sarikaya
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology September 2020, 48 (3) 278-282; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.119.236109
Ismet Sarikaya
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Kuwait University Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait City, Kuwait; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ali Sarikaya
2Department of Nuclear Medicine, Trakya University Faculty of Medicine, Edirne, Turkey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Effect of body weight on SUV. Image shows whole-body 18F-FDG PET maximum-intensity projection of obese !patient (59-y-old woman; weight, 114 kg; height,165 cm; lean body mass, 59.4 kg). SUVmean in liver and blood pool are 5 and 4.1, respectively, which are above normal values and higher than visually seen activity in liver and blood pool. SUL is 2.6 in liver and 2.1 in blood pool. Overweight and obesity can also cause overestimation of SUV in lesions.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    18F-FDG PET whole-body maximum-intensity projection and transaxial selected PET slice from liver in adult patient with erroneously low SUV (liver SUVmean, 0.4). Inaccurate entering of injected 18F-FDG activity in PET computer (3,000 MBq instead of 300 MBq) caused significantly low SUV in liver and other tissues in this patient. When measured SUV does not match visual findings, it is important to check patient data in PET computer (weight, height, and injected dose). In addition, as activity is decay-corrected for SUV, accuracy of injection and imaging start times should also be checked. Clocks used in department should be synchronized.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    Effect of high blood glucose on brain 18F-FDG uptake in 18F-FDG PET whole-body maximum-intensity projection images. (A) A 48-y-old woman with recently diagnosed breast cancer (fasting blood glucose, 97.2 mg/dL; SUVmax in right frontal cortex, 19.6; SUVmean in liver, 3.6; SUVmean in blood pool, 3.2). (B) A 52-y-old man with pancreatic lesion (fasting blood glucose, 216 mg/dL; SUVmax in right frontal cortex, 5; SUVmean in liver, 2.7; SUVmean in blood pool, 1.5). Visually, there is diffusely decreased uptake in brain. Patient does not have cranial symptoms. Compare brain activity with liver uptake and bladder activity in both cases.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology: 48 (3)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
Vol. 48, Issue 3
September 1, 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Assessing PET Parameters in Oncologic 18F-FDG Studies
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology web site.
Citation Tools
Assessing PET Parameters in Oncologic 18F-FDG Studies
Ismet Sarikaya, Ali Sarikaya
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Sep 2020, 48 (3) 278-282; DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.119.236109

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Assessing PET Parameters in Oncologic 18F-FDG Studies
Ismet Sarikaya, Ali Sarikaya
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Sep 2020, 48 (3) 278-282; DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.119.236109
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • SUV
    • MTV AND TLG
    • UPTAKE RATIO
    • DUAL–TIME-POINT PET IMAGING AND RETENTION INDEX
    • DYNAMIC PET IMAGING
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Biology of Cancer and PET Imaging: Pictorial Review
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Early 10-Minute Postinjection [18F]F-FAPI-42 uEXPLORER Total-Body PET/CT Scanning Protocol for Staging Lung Cancer Using HYPER Iterative Reconstruction
  • Single- Versus Dual-Time-Point Imaging for Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloid Using 99mTc-Pyrophosphate
  • Does Arthrography Improve Accuracy of SPECT/CT for Diagnosis of Aseptic Loosening in Patients with Painful Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis
Show more Imaging

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • PET
  • parameter
  • 18F-FDG
  • oncology
  • SUV
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire