Skip to main content
  • Main menu
  • User menu
  • Search
  • English ▼
    • English
    • Afrikaans
    • Albanian
    • Amharic
    • Arabic
    • Armenian
    • Azerbaijani
    • Basque
    • Belarusian
    • Bengali
    • Bosnian
    • Bulgarian
    • Catalan
    • Cebuano
    • Chichewa
    • Chinese (Simplified)
    • Chinese (Traditional)
    • Corsican
    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Danish
    • Dutch
    • Esperanto
    • Estonian
    • Filipino
    • Finnish
    • French
    • Frisian
    • Galician
    • Georgian
    • German
    • Greek
    • Gujarati
    • Haitian Creole
    • Hausa
    • Hawaiian
    • Hebrew
    • Hindi
    • Hmong
    • Hungarian
    • Icelandic
    • Igbo
    • Indonesian
    • Irish
    • Italian
    • Japanese
    • Javanese
    • Kannada
    • Kazakh
    • Khmer
    • Korean
    • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
    • Kyrgyz
    • Lao
    • Latin
    • Latvian
    • Lithuanian
    • Luxembourgish
    • Macedonian
    • Malagasy
    • Malay
    • Malayalam
    • Maltese
    • Maori
    • Marathi
    • Mongolian
    • Myanmar (Burmese)
    • Nepali
    • Norwegian
    • Pashto
    • Persian
    • Polish
    • Portuguese
    • Punjabi
    • Romanian
    • Russian
    • Samoan
    • Scottish Gaelic
    • Serbian
    • Sesotho
    • Shona
    • Sindhi
    • Sinhala
    • Slovak
    • Slovenian
    • Somali
    • Spanish
    • Sudanese
    • Swahili
    • Swedish
    • Tajik
    • Tamil
    • Telugu
    • Thai
    • Turkish
    • Ukrainian
    • Urdu
    • Uzbek
    • Vietnamese
    • Welsh
    • Xhosa
    • Yiddish
    • Yoruba
    • Zulu

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
      • JNMT Supplement
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

Advanced Search

English ▼
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scottish Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sudanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu
  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Watch or Listen to JNMT Podcast
  • Visit SNMMI on Facebook
  • Join SNMMI on LinkedIn
  • Follow SNMMI on Twitter
  • Subscribe to JNMT RSS feeds
Review ArticleContinuing Education

18F-Sodium Fluoride PET: History, Technical Feasibility, Mechanism of Action, Normal Biodistribution, and Diagnostic Performance in Bone Metastasis Detection Compared with Other Imaging Modalities

Kriti Ahuja, Houman Sotoudeh, Samuel J. Galgano, Ramandeep Singh, Nishant Gupta, Siddhartha Gaddamanugu and Gagandeep Choudhary
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology March 2020, 48 (1) 9-16; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.119.234336
Kriti Ahuja
1Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Houman Sotoudeh
1Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Samuel J. Galgano
1Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ramandeep Singh
2Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nishant Gupta
3Department of Radiology, Columbia University at Bassett Healthcare, Cooperstown, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Siddhartha Gaddamanugu
1Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gagandeep Choudhary
1Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    A 66-y-old man with history of prostate adenocarcinoma, seen for evaluation of bony metastasis after androgen deprivation therapy and definitive radiotherapy. (A and B) Anterior and posterior maximum-intensity projections of 18F-NaF PET scan show normal physiologic biodistribution. Mild scattered degenerative changes are seen in spine. (C and D) Anterior and posterior views of whole-body 99mTc-MDP bone scan of same patient performed 3 wk earlier show normal physiologic biodistribution. Both scans show no metastatic lesions.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    An 81-y-old woman with history of metastatic breast cancer. Sagittal 18F-NaF PET (A) and CT (B) images and anterior maximum-intensity projection (C) show diffuse sclerotic metastasis to entire spine and sternum with abnormally increased tracer uptake. Maximum-intensity projection also demonstrates abnormal uptake in ribs and pelvis.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    A 48-y-old woman with history of plasma cell dyscrasia. (A and B) Anterior and posterior maximum-intensity projections of 18F-NaF PET scan show multifocal areas of abnormally increased tracer uptake in spine, bilateral ribs, and mandible. (C–H) Selected axial PET and CT bone window images show expansile lesions involving bilateral ribs with ground glass density and associated abnormal tracer uptake. These lesions were stable on multiple follow-up scans and were attributable to polyostotic fibrous dysplasia.

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    A 58-y-old woman with history of metastatic colorectal cancer, seen after radiation therapy and placement of fixation hardware for lytic metastasis to left proximal humerus. Anterior maximum-intensity projection of 18F-NaF (A) and 18F-FDG (B) PET scans shows heterogeneously increased tracer uptake in left proximal humerus secondary to bone remodeling. No other area of abnormal tracer activity is seen elsewhere. (C) X-ray of left humerus shows cement and fixation hardware.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Comparison Table Between 18F-NaF and 99mTc-MDP (1,17)

    Characteristic18F-NaF99mTc-MDP
    ProductionCyclotronGenerator
    Half-life109.7 min6 h
    Photon energy511 keV140 keV
    Spatial resolutionHigher (4–5 mm)Lower
    Critical organUrinary bladderBones
    Typical dose185–370 MBq (5–10 mCi)740–1,100 MBq (20–30 mCi)
    Injection to imaging time30–60 min3–4 h
    Effective dose8.9 mSv (370 MBq [10 mCi])5.3 mSv (925 MBq [25 mCi])
    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Studies Comparing 18F-NaF with Other Radiotracers

    StudyParameterSnSpPPVNPVAc
    Meta-analysis of 18F-NaF in both benign and malignant lesions (5)Patient-based pooled96%98%
    Lesion-based pooled97%98%
    Bone metastasis detection in hepatocellular carcinoma (37)99mTc-MDP73.3%79.2%86.8%61.3%75.4%
    18F-NaF PET/CT93.3%100%100%88.9%97.5%
    Bone metastasis detection in urinary bladder cancer (36)99mTc-MDP82.35%64.51%56%86.95%70.83%
    99mTc-MDP SPECT/CT88.23%74.19%65.21%92%79.16%
    18F-NaF PET/CT100%87.09%80.95%100%91.66%
    High-risk prostate cancer (35)99mTc-MDP70%57%64%55%
    99mTc-MDP SPECT/CT92%82%86%90%
    18F-NaF PET100%62%74%100%
    18F-NaF PET/CT100%100%100%100%
    Spine metastasis in prostate cancer (42)99mTc-MDP51%82%86%43%61%
    18F-NaF PET/CT93%54%82%78%81%
    18F-fluoromethylcholine PET/CT85%91%95%75%87%
    Bone metastasis detection in head and neck cancer (60)18F-NaF PET/CT69.4%
    18F-FDG PET/CT57.1%
    Detection of skull-base invasion in nasopharyngeal cancer (62)18F-NaF PET/CT100%94.7%96.3%100%97.8%
    18F-FDG PET/CT65.4%100%100%67.9%80%
    Detection of bone metastasis in nasopharyngeal cancer (62)18F-NaF PET/CT98.3%65.7%
    18F-FDG PET/CT42.9%97.1%
    • Sn = sensitivity; Sp = specificity; PPV = positive predictive value; NPV = negative predictive value; Ac = accuracy.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology: 48 (1)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
Vol. 48, Issue 1
March 1, 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools
Share
18F-Sodium Fluoride PET: History, Technical Feasibility, Mechanism of Action, Normal Biodistribution, and Diagnostic Performance in Bone Metastasis Detection Compared with Other Imaging Modalities
Kriti Ahuja, Houman Sotoudeh, Samuel J. Galgano, Ramandeep Singh, Nishant Gupta, Siddhartha Gaddamanugu, Gagandeep Choudhary
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Mar 2020, 48 (1) 9-16; DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.119.234336
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • HISTORY
    • TECHNICAL ASPECTS
    • MECHANISM OF ACTION AND RADIOBIOLOGY
    • NORMAL BIODISTRIBUTION
    • COMPARISON
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • First-in-Humans PET Imaging of Tissue Factor in Patients with Primary and Metastatic Cancers Using 18F-labeled Active-Site Inhibited Factor VII (18F-ASIS): Potential as Companion Diagnostic
  • 18F-NaF PET/CT
  • Its Time to Celebrate!
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Illuminating the Hidden: Standardizing Cardiac MIBG Imaging for Sympathetic Dysfunction
  • PET/CT Case Series: Unmasking the Mystery of Cardiac Sarcoidosis
  • Delivery Methods of Radiopharmaceuticals: Exploring Global Strategies to Minimize Occupational Radiation Exposure
Show more Continuing Education

Similar Articles

  • 99mTc-Pertechnetate in Diagnosis of Meckel Diverticulum in an Adult
  • Patient Preparation with Esomeprazole Is Comparable to Ranitidine in Meckel Diverticulum Scintigraphy
  • A Pelvic Meckel Diverticulum Mimicking the Urinary Bladder on a Meckel Scan
  • SNMMI and EANM Practice Guideline for Meckel Diverticulum Scintigraphy 2.0
  • Meckel’s Diverticulum Imaging
See more

Keywords

  • 18F-sodium fluoride
  • PET/CT
  • bone scan
  • bone metastases
  • 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire
Alerts for this Article
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email this Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
18F-Sodium Fluoride PET: History, Technical Feasibility, Mechanism of Action, Normal Biodistribution, and Diagnostic Performance in Bone Metastasis Detection Compared with Other Imaging Modalities
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology web site.
Citation Tools
18F-Sodium Fluoride PET: History, Technical Feasibility, Mechanism of Action, Normal Biodistribution, and Diagnostic Performance in Bone Metastasis Detection Compared with Other Imaging Modalities
Kriti Ahuja, Houman Sotoudeh, Samuel J. Galgano, Ramandeep Singh, Nishant Gupta, Siddhartha Gaddamanugu, Gagandeep Choudhary
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Mar 2020, 48 (1) 9-16; DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.119.234336

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience

By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies.