Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
      • JNMT Supplement
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Watch or Listen to JNMT Podcast
  • Visit SNMMI on Facebook
  • Join SNMMI on LinkedIn
  • Follow SNMMI on Twitter
  • Subscribe to JNMT RSS feeds
Research ArticleImaging

Cardiac Displacement During 13N-Ammonia Myocardial Perfusion PET/CT: Comparison Between Adenosine- and Regadenoson-Induced Stress

Elise J. Vleeming, Sergiy V. Lazarenko, Friso M. van der Zant, Xiao-Bo Pan, Jerome M. Declerck, Maurits Wondergem and Remco J.J. Knol
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology June 2018, 46 (2) 114-122; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.117.199463
Elise J. Vleeming
1Cardiac Imaging Division Alkmaar, Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, The Netherlands
2PET Center Northwest/Department of Nuclear Medicine, Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, The Netherlands; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sergiy V. Lazarenko
1Cardiac Imaging Division Alkmaar, Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, The Netherlands
2PET Center Northwest/Department of Nuclear Medicine, Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, The Netherlands; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Friso M. van der Zant
1Cardiac Imaging Division Alkmaar, Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, The Netherlands
2PET Center Northwest/Department of Nuclear Medicine, Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, The Netherlands; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xiao-Bo Pan
3Siemens Molecular Imaging, Oxford, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jerome M. Declerck
3Siemens Molecular Imaging, Oxford, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maurits Wondergem
1Cardiac Imaging Division Alkmaar, Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, The Netherlands
2PET Center Northwest/Department of Nuclear Medicine, Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, The Netherlands; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Remco J.J. Knol
1Cardiac Imaging Division Alkmaar, Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, The Netherlands
2PET Center Northwest/Department of Nuclear Medicine, Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, The Netherlands; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Components of rest and stress acquisitions (adenosine or regadenoson).

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    (Top) Example of cardiac displacement during adenosine stress. Displacement is depicted in coronal, transverse, and sagittal planes in x, y, and z directions, respectively. Images represent data obtained at 3 min after scan initiation (frame 3; reference frame), at 14 min (2 min after initiation of adenosine), and at 25 min (last frame of stress acquisition). Bolder vertical and horizontal lines in each tile of 14- and 25-min series represent displacement relative to initial position of heart (fainter lines). (Bottom) Displacement in x, y, and z directions in this patient during entire scan, relative to reference frame (at 3 min after initiation of scan).

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    Median with interquartile ranges of mean cardiac displacement in x, y, and z directions and total displacement vector length for both adenosine and regadenoson. (A) Displacement during stress relative to previous available frame. (B) Displacement at rest. (C) Displacement relative to reference frame (frame 3) during stress. (D) Displacement relative to reference frame at rest. Statistical analysis was performed using Mann–Whitney tests.

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    Cardiac displacement during stress and rest acquisitions in x, y, and z directions and total displacement vector length (dotted line). Data represent mean of all patients relative to reference frame (frame 3) (A and B) or relative to previous frame (C and D). (A and C) Displacement during adenosine stress. (B and D) Displacement during regadenoson stress. Gaps in plots are result of exclusion of frames because of high blood-pool activity after injection of 13NH3.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Baseline Characteristics, Known Risk Factors, Stress Test Parameters, and Clinical PET/CT Diagnosis

    ParameterAdenosineRegadenosonP
    Baseline characteristics
     Sex0.901
      Male15 (50%)15 (48%)
      Female15 (50%)16 (52%)
     Age (y)68 ± 1067 ± 90.608†
     Body mass index28.1 ± 4.827.1 ± 4.90.116
     Duke Clinical Score (%)*62 ± 3355 ± 320.243
    Risk factors
     Diabetes mellitus0 (0.0%)6 (19.4%)0.012
     Family history of coronary artery disease7 (23.3%)8 (25.8%)0.824
     Hypertension18 (60.0%)14 (45.2%)0.250
     Smoking4 (13.3%)6 (19.4%)0.529
     Previous myocardial infarction13 (43.3%)5 (16.1%)0.021
     Previous percutaneous coronary intervention12 (40.0%)6 (19.4%)0.080
     Previous coronary artery bypass grafting2 (6.7%)2 (6.5%)0.973
    Stress test parameters
     Maximum heart rate during stress (bpm)91 ± 1894 ± 180.704
     Percentage heart rate of maximum59.1 ± 9.961.1 ± 12.00.367
     Systole at peak stress (mm Hg)125.1 ± 15.8136.1 ± 14.80.602
     Diastole at peak stress (mm Hg)67.5 ± 10.571.0 ± 9.50.611
    PET/CT results
     No ischemia or infarction17 (56.7%)22 (70.9%)
     Ischemia10 (33.3%)3 (9.7%)0.141‡
     Infarction3 (10.0%)6 (19.4%)
    Motion artifacts, static stress14 (46.7%)9 (30.0%)0.192
    • ↵* In both groups, Duke Clinical Score was missing in 2 patients.

    • ↵† Independent-samples t tests.

    • ↵‡ χ2 tests.

    • Qualitative data are expressed as numbers followed by percentages in parentheses; continuous data are expressed as mean ± SD. Statistical analyses were done using Mann–Whitney tests by default, or as indicated.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Maximal Displacement in 3 Axes During Stress Acquisitions* Using Previous Frame or Frame 3 as Reference

    Relative to previous frameRelative to frame 3
    DirectionAdenosineRegadenosonPAdenosineRegadenosonP
    Negative x−2.9 ± 1.8−2.3 ± 1.50.083−2.5 ± 1.9−2.9 ± 2.30.435
    Negative y−3.1 ± 1.8−2.3 ± 1.50.024−4.8 ± 3.3−3.1 ± 2.00.012
    Negative z−6.4 ± 3.7−4.9 ± 2.20.123−9.9 ± 5.3−7.1 ± 3.60.048
    Positive x2.7 ± 1.41.8 ± 1.00.0072.2 ± 2.60.7 ± 1.50.063
    Positive y2.6 ± 1.42.2 ± 1.70.0820.2 ± 2.30.7 ± 1.30.030
    Positive z4.9 ± 2.53.7 ± 1.70.0340.4 ± 3.20.6 ± 2.30.229
    • ↵* Frames 13–25 for adenosine and frames 15–25 for regadenoson.

    • Data are mean millimeters ± SD. Analysis for displacement relative to previous frame was done using Mann–Whitney tests. Analysis for displacement relative to frame 3 was done using independent-samples t tests.

    • View popup
    TABLE 3

    Maximal Displacement as Vector Length During Rest and Stress Acquisitions Using Previous Frame or Frame 3 as Reference

    Relative to previous frameRelative to frame 3
    Vector length during…AdenosineRegadenosonPAdenosineRegadenosonP
    Rest3.8 ± 1.93.8 ± 1.50.5934.1 ± 1.74.4 ± 2.60.971
    Stress8.1 ± 3.76.1 ± 2.30.02211.6 ± 5.28.6 ± 3.00.014
    • Data are mean millimeters ± SD. Analysis was done using Mann–Whitney tests.

    • View popup
    TABLE 4

    Total Number of Frames of All Patients with Minor, Medium, and Large Displacement During Stress Acquisition Using Previous Frame or Frame 3 as Reference

    Relative to previous frameRelative to frame 3
    ParameterAdenosineRegadenosonPAdenosineRegadenosonP
    Frames with <5 mm stress1,025 (94.9%)1,088 (97.5%)861 (79.7%)991 (88.8%)
    Frames with 5–10 mm stress51 (4.7%)27 (2.4%)0.005174 (16.1%)112 (10.0%)<0.001
    Frames with >10 mm stress4 (0.4%)1 (0.1%)45 (4.2%)13 (1.2%)
    Minor displacement (<5 mm)10 (33.3%)12 (38.7%)4 (13.3%)7 (22.6%)
    Medium displacement (5–10 mm)16 (53.3%)18 (58.1%)0.35211 (36.7%)20 (64.5%)0.007
    Large displacement (>10 mm)4 (13.3%)1 (3.2%)15 (50.0%)4 (12.9%)
    • Data are n (of patients) and in percentage. Analysis was done using χ2 tests.

    • View popup
    TABLE 5

    Reported Symptoms During Stress Acquisition

    Symptoms during stress acquisitionsAdenosine*RegadenosonP
    None6 (19.4%)9 (15.3%)0.357
    Typical chest pain10 (33.3%)8 (25.8%)0.409
    Respiratory16 (53.3%)11 (35.5%)0.095
    Gastrointestinal5 (16.7%)7 (22.6%)0.653
    Vasodilation12 (40.0%)14 (45.2%)0.859
    Other3 (10.0%)3 (9.7%)0.895
    General degree of discomfort†2.9 ± 1.12.6 ± 1.10.428
    • ↵* Two surveys were missing from adenosine group.

    • ↵† General degree of discomfort was expressed as a number from 1 (no discomfort at all) to 5 (very inconvenient). One patient in each group gave a deviant answer, and both of these patients were excluded from the analysis.

    • Data are n and percentage, or mean ± SD. Analysis was done using χ2 tests to identify differences between stress and rest acquisitions.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology: 46 (2)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
Vol. 46, Issue 2
June 1, 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cardiac Displacement During 13N-Ammonia Myocardial Perfusion PET/CT: Comparison Between Adenosine- and Regadenoson-Induced Stress
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology web site.
Citation Tools
Cardiac Displacement During 13N-Ammonia Myocardial Perfusion PET/CT: Comparison Between Adenosine- and Regadenoson-Induced Stress
Elise J. Vleeming, Sergiy V. Lazarenko, Friso M. van der Zant, Xiao-Bo Pan, Jerome M. Declerck, Maurits Wondergem, Remco J.J. Knol
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Jun 2018, 46 (2) 114-122; DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.117.199463

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Cardiac Displacement During 13N-Ammonia Myocardial Perfusion PET/CT: Comparison Between Adenosine- and Regadenoson-Induced Stress
Elise J. Vleeming, Sergiy V. Lazarenko, Friso M. van der Zant, Xiao-Bo Pan, Jerome M. Declerck, Maurits Wondergem, Remco J.J. Knol
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Jun 2018, 46 (2) 114-122; DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.117.199463
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Early 10-Minute Postinjection [18F]F-FAPI-42 uEXPLORER Total-Body PET/CT Scanning Protocol for Staging Lung Cancer Using HYPER Iterative Reconstruction
  • Single- Versus Dual-Time-Point Imaging for Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloid Using 99mTc-Pyrophosphate
  • Does Arthrography Improve Accuracy of SPECT/CT for Diagnosis of Aseptic Loosening in Patients with Painful Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis
Show more Imaging

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • myocardial perfusion PET/CT
  • ammonia
  • motion artifacts
  • adenosine
  • regadenoson
  • pharmacologic stress
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire