Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
      • JNMT Supplement
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Watch or Listen to JNMT Podcast
  • Visit SNMMI on Facebook
  • Join SNMMI on LinkedIn
  • Follow SNMMI on Twitter
  • Subscribe to JNMT RSS feeds
Research ArticleIMAGING

New Routine for Nuclear Medicine Technologists to Determine When to Add SPECT/CT to a Whole-Body Bone Scan

Asal Shafi, Ola Thorsson and Lars Edenbrandt
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology March 2014, 42 (1) 28-32; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.113.132035
Asal Shafi
Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ola Thorsson
Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lars Edenbrandt
Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Training cases. Bone scan images are displayed on left. Clinical information from referral and symptoms from patient are on right. Desired decision “SPECT/CT required or not” is displayed only after technologist has made decision and has clicked button to show this information.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    Test cases. Images are displayed in same way as for training cases except that desired decision regarding “SPECT/CT required or not” is not available.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Criteria for Performing SPECT/CT After Whole-Body Bone Scan

    SectionDescription
    AIndications for not performing SPECT/CT after bone scan
     Patient cannot participate in SPECT/CT examination
     Widespread metastatic disease is present
     A previous whole-body bone scan is available and no new lesions are present
    BIndications for performing SPECT/CT after bone scan
     Focal lesions in spine or pelvis are present
     Patient reports newly developed pain from spine or pelvis
     Prostate cancer patients have prostate-specific antigen that is increasing or > 20 ng/mL even though no metastatic lesions are present (SPECT/CT of lumbar spine and pelvis)
     Large urinary bladder is covering sacrum and patient has reported symptoms from this area
    CIndications for not performing SPECT/CT
     Whole-body bone scan has normal results and no criteria from section B to perform SPECT/CT are fulfilled
    DIf technologist is unsure whether SPECT/CT should be performed, technologist calls physician
    • These criteria apply to patients suspected of having metastatic disease. For other indications, nuclear medicine physician makes decision.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Distribution of 100 Evaluation Cases from Nuclear Medicine Technologists and Physicians

    Nuclear medicine technologist
    PhysicianSPECT/CT requiredSPECT/CT not required
    SPECT/CT required634
    SPECT/CT not required627
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology: 42 (1)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
Vol. 42, Issue 1
March 1, 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
New Routine for Nuclear Medicine Technologists to Determine When to Add SPECT/CT to a Whole-Body Bone Scan
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology web site.
Citation Tools
New Routine for Nuclear Medicine Technologists to Determine When to Add SPECT/CT to a Whole-Body Bone Scan
Asal Shafi, Ola Thorsson, Lars Edenbrandt
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Mar 2014, 42 (1) 28-32; DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.113.132035

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
New Routine for Nuclear Medicine Technologists to Determine When to Add SPECT/CT to a Whole-Body Bone Scan
Asal Shafi, Ola Thorsson, Lars Edenbrandt
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Mar 2014, 42 (1) 28-32; DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.113.132035
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Early 10-Minute Postinjection [18F]F-FAPI-42 uEXPLORER Total-Body PET/CT Scanning Protocol for Staging Lung Cancer Using HYPER Iterative Reconstruction
  • Single- Versus Dual-Time-Point Imaging for Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloid Using 99mTc-Pyrophosphate
  • Does Arthrography Improve Accuracy of SPECT/CT for Diagnosis of Aseptic Loosening in Patients with Painful Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis
Show more Imaging

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • assessment
  • criteria
  • whole-body bone scan
  • SPECT/CT
  • image interpretation
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire