Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
      • JNMT Supplement
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Watch or Listen to JNMT Podcast
  • Visit SNMMI on Facebook
  • Join SNMMI on LinkedIn
  • Follow SNMMI on Twitter
  • Subscribe to JNMT RSS feeds
Review ArticleINVITED PERSPECTIVE

Global Contrast in Nuclear Medicine

Geoffrey M. Currie, Hosen Kiat and Janelle M. Wheat
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology September 2010, 38 (3) 115-116; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.110.078535
Geoffrey M. Currie
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hosen Kiat
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Janelle M. Wheat
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

A few decades ago the expression “it's like comparing apples and oranges” was widely used when arguing the relative merits of 99mTc-based radiopharmaceuticals with the more traditional 201Tl-chloride in myocardial perfusion imaging. Recent articles in the Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology (JNMT) highlighted that this same expression might be equally relevant when discussing the provision of nuclear medicine services across the developed world.

For many years, developed countries in the northern hemisphere have enjoyed a reliable and cost-effective supply of cyclotron-produced radionuclides, whereas those in the southern hemisphere, particularly Australia, relied on importing cyclotron-producedSee J Nucl Med Technol 2010;38:1–3, 6–17nuclides from the northern hemisphere. In the early 1990s, the Australian National Medical Cyclotron was constructed to meet the local needs for cyclotron-produced PET and general nuclear medicine radionuclides. Unfortunately, the investment failed on both fronts, and the system was commercially decommissioned this year, leaving Australia with only a handful of compact cyclotrons dedicated to PET tracer production. Although cyclotron-produced radionuclides are readily and cost-effectively available in the northern hemisphere (e.g., 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine), the southern hemisphere is confronted with a relative cost-prohibition. Indeed, although most nuclear medicine texts cite the importance of 123I in thyroid imaging, it is not generally used in Australia.

The global 99mTc crisis, however, should be more accurately described as a compartmented global crisis because the impact in the southern hemisphere has been minimal. Dated reactors and lack of new reactor installations in the northern hemisphere will produce recurring 99mTc supply stress. Indeed, the Society of Nuclear Medicine Technologist Section (SNMTS) recently launched an awareness campaign in an attempt to protect the 99mTc-based imaging industry. The “Got 99mTc?” T-shirt is part of that initiative. Furthermore, cyclotrons are being looked at to produce 99mTc more reliably (1), which casts the industry back to the pre-99Mo/99mTc generator era of daily deliveries, unreliable service (particularly after hours), and carrier-related issues with image quality. Changes to clinical practice have been proposed to accommodate the lack of 99mTc. Because of this lack of 99mTc, Pagnanelli and Basso reported in a recent JNMT article (2) on the clinical utility and protocols for 201Tl myocardial perfusion studies, a regression to days gone by. The use of 67Ga-citrate– and 111In-labeled white blood cells in preference to 99mTc-labeled white blood cells in infection imaging provides another example. In the same journal, Buck et al. (3) reported that the proliferation of PET/CT in the United States was well in excess of global trends, perhaps a measure of funding policy and an adoption of technology not reliant on 99mTc supply. With reference to the former, because of the much more prescriptive and restrictive policy in Australia, the United States enjoys a much greater clinical diversity of rebates than does Australia. It would be an interesting exercise to gain a snapshot of whether the global 99mTc shortage has seen an associated increase in the number of 18F ion bone scans or, in fact, a tendency to favor a move toward 13N ammonia myocardial perfusion more than a regression toward 201Tl. One consolation in this scenario is that patients are retained in nuclear medicine. Anecdotal evidence from the United Kingdom suggests that, for example, bone scanning may be performed only on a single day per week, which has encouraged a more widespread reliance on anatomic imaging. At a time when anatomic imaging is challenging traditional strongholds of nuclear medicine (e.g., cardiac CT or MRI and CT angiography for pulmonary embolism), the lack of 99mTc provides little resistance.

In the southern hemisphere, there could not be a greater contrast. There are numerous new reactors, including in Australia and South America, and high-production capabilities in South Africa. There is no shortage of 99mTc, and indeed, it is used in preference to cyclotron-produced radionuclides such as 67Ga-citrate and 201Tl. The hemispheric gap is perhaps best highlighted by the comparatively rapid adoption of 99mTc-based radiopharmaceuticals for myocardial perfusion and the virtual absence of 123I- and 111In-based radiopharmaceuticals in clinical practice in Australia. Similarly, the availability of 99mTc in the southern hemisphere sees a relative favoring of 99mTc-labeled white blood cells over 67Ga-citrate for infection imaging, of 99mTc-sestamibi over 201Tl-chloride in oncology, and of 99mTc-based ventilation agents such as aerosols and Technegas (Cyclopharm) over 81mKr (which is not clinically available). Nonetheless, at the time this article was being written Australia was suffering its own version of a 99mTc crisis, with the national reactor closed for routine maintenance, causing shockwaves through the nuclear medicine community. Those most significantly affected suffered 2 weeks of lower yields on 99Mo/99mTc generators (e.g., in one of the worst cases drawn to our attention, the department in question received only 60% of its anticipated calibrated activity). Furthermore, those relying on centralized pharmacies had dose-capping measures used—for example, a 10% reduction in dispensed doses across the board. Locally, the shockwaves appeared more severe than the reality because 99Mo has enjoyed a large production surplus for many years, with generators routinely topped up and leaving departments counting on larger activities than ordered and paid for. In fact, previous global 99mTc crises have simply seen Australian departments get the activity ordered and paid for (rather than the higher yields consumers have become accustomed to due to the “topped up” generator activities).

Although the United States enjoys 6.5 PET/CT scanners per million people and Europe has 1.2 PET/CT scanners per million people (3), Australia gets by with fewer than 0.5 PET/CT scanners per million people. Furthermore, states such as Texas, Florida, New York, and Pennsylvania have populations less than that of Australia, yet each has between 10 and 16 times more PET/CT scanners servicing its population. Thus, the relative abundance of 99mTc might be offset by a relative absence of other novel non–99mTc SPECT tracers and scarcity of PET/CT services. Moreover, the bulk of the medical literature globally reflects practice in the northern hemisphere, and the discordance between the hemispheres may not be reflected in the literature. Consequently, the scourge that is the 99mTc crisis in the northern hemisphere may be perceived as a global issue and change referral patterns and clinical practice unnecessarily in the southern hemisphere. Conversely, the expectation in the southern hemisphere for access to PET/CT services or novel tracers might fall frustratingly short of the actual capabilities.

A comparison of nuclear medicine status and service provision between the 2 hemispheres highlights different capabilities and different barriers, and these are not always reflected in the typically northern hemispheric–driven journal publications. A comparison of nuclear medicine status and service provision between the 2 hemispheres is like comparing apples and oranges, or perhaps baseball and cricket.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    1. Guérin B,
    2. Tremblay S,
    3. Rodrigue S,
    4. et al
    . Cyclotron production of 99mTc: an approach to the medical isotope crisis. J Nucl Med. 2010;51(4):13N–16N.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Pagnanelli RA,
    2. Basso DA
    . Myocardial perfusion imaging with 201Tl. J Nucl Med Technol. 2010;38:1–3.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Buck AK,
    2. Herrmann K,
    3. Stargardt T,
    4. Dechow T,
    5. Krause BJ,
    6. Schreyögg J
    . Economic evaluation of PET and PET/CT in oncology: evidence and methodologic approaches. J Nucl Med Technol. 2010;38:6–17.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  • Received for publication April 27, 2010.
  • Accepted for publication July 8, 2010.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology: 38 (3)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
Vol. 38, Issue 3
September 1, 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Global Contrast in Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology web site.
Citation Tools
Global Contrast in Nuclear Medicine
Geoffrey M. Currie, Hosen Kiat, Janelle M. Wheat
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Sep 2010, 38 (3) 115-116; DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.110.078535

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Global Contrast in Nuclear Medicine
Geoffrey M. Currie, Hosen Kiat, Janelle M. Wheat
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Sep 2010, 38 (3) 115-116; DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.110.078535
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Medical Isotope Crisis
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Navigating a Transatlantic Career Shift: Guidance for U.S. Nuclear Medicine Technologists Looking to Relocate to the U.K.
  • Ventilation/Perfusion Lung Scan Safety Statement in the Current Coronavirus Disease 2019 Environment
  • The Rise of Cardiac Amyloidosis Imaging
Show more Invited Perspective

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire