Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
      • JNMT Supplement
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Watch or Listen to JNMT Podcast
  • Visit SNMMI on Facebook
  • Join SNMMI on LinkedIn
  • Follow SNMMI on Twitter
  • Subscribe to JNMT RSS feeds
OtherIMAGING

A 3-Dimensional Mathematic Cylinder Phantom for the Evaluation of the Fundamental Performance of SPECT

Hideo Onishi, Nobutoku Motomura, Masaaki Takahashi, Masamichi Yanagisawa and Koichi Ogawa
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology March 2010, 38 (1) 42-48; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.108.061192
Hideo Onishi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nobutoku Motomura
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Masaaki Takahashi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Masamichi Yanagisawa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Koichi Ogawa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1. 

    Projection view (A) and surface-rendered image (B) of 3D-MAC phantom.

  • FIGURE 2. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2. 

    Dimension specifications of 3D-MAC phantom (A) and its detailed components (B).

  • FIGURE 3. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3. 

    (A) Ideal images of each stacked cylinder diameter and uniform parts of 3D-MAC phantom. Image matrix is 128 × 128, and pixels are 2 × 2 mm. (B) Because this is 3D-MACl phantom, slice range of each volume is automatically calculated when image reconstruction range is set from 1 to 128 (64). Phantom volume at image matrix and pixel size is shown in table. (C) Reconstruction image range. ϕ = diameter.

  • FIGURE 4. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4. 

    SPECT projection dataset. (A) Total component in main window. (B) Primary component in main window. (C) Scatter component in main window. (D) Total component in low subwindow.

  • FIGURE 5. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 5. 

    Images displaying ROI settings for contrast evaluation; ROIs are set at 100% or 65% against slice of 40-mm-diameter stacked cylinder of 3D-MAC phantom and are adapted to processed images. Processed images are data generated using LEGP collimator with rotation radius of 200 mm and 100-count maximum in 1 pixel in projection.

  • FIGURE 6. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 6. 

    Graph shows relative count values for each cylinder in HR/150, HR/200, and GP/200 images. SPECT count values for 60-mm cylinder in HR/150 image is set at 1.0 HR/200-LEHR, radius of detector rotation is 200 mm; GP/200-LEGP, radius of detector rotation is 200 mm; HR/150-LEHR, radius of detector rotation is 150 mm.

  • FIGURE 7. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 7. 

    These images provide comparison between OSEM and FBP methods. At top are images obtained with each reconstruction method, and at bottom is count profile curve of stacked cylinder with 20-mm diameter.

  • FIGURE 8. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 8. 

    SPECT images of slice of uniform volume of phantom with and without scatter correction and with and without attenuation correction in uniformity. (A) Without scatter and attenuation correction. (B) With scatter correction only. (C) With attenuation correction only. (D) With scatter correction and attenuation correction.

  • FIGURE 9. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 9. 

    Reconstructed images of projection data imported to these commercially available data-processing devices: GENIE (A), GMS-5500 (B), e.soft (C), and Odyssey (D). ϕ = diameter.

  • FIGURE 10. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 10. 

    We have created count profile curves that normalized by count of edge in uniform image. (A) Combinations of scatter correction and attenuation correction. (B) Count profile curves are shown for following values of linear attenuation coefficients: μ = 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, and 0.20 cm−1. +Sc = with scatter correction; +Ac = with attenuation correction; −Sc = without scatter correction; −Ac = without attenuation correction.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Parameters of 7 Simulations

    Simulation no.CollimatorRadius of rotation (mm)Pixel size (mm)Maximum counts in single projectionField of view (cm)Matrix size
    1LEHR200410025.664 × 64
    2LEGP200410025.664 × 64
    3LEHR150410025.664 × 64
    4LEHR150210025.6128 × 128
    5LEHR20045025.664 × 64
    6LEHR200610038.464 × 64
    7LEGP200610038.464 × 64
    • Projection sampling angle is 3.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    DICOM Data Imported to 4 Commercially Available Data Processors

    ParameterGMS-5500e.softOdysseyGENIE
    Pixel size (mm)2222
    Total counts39,624,47039,628,23239,628,04039,628,233
    Projection maximal counts for angle…
     082858585
     4596959595
     9092919191
     13588878787
     18085848484
     22594939393
     27081808080
     31588878787
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology: 38 (1)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
Vol. 38, Issue 1
March 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A 3-Dimensional Mathematic Cylinder Phantom for the Evaluation of the Fundamental Performance of SPECT
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology web site.
Citation Tools
A 3-Dimensional Mathematic Cylinder Phantom for the Evaluation of the Fundamental Performance of SPECT
Hideo Onishi, Nobutoku Motomura, Masaaki Takahashi, Masamichi Yanagisawa, Koichi Ogawa
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Mar 2010, 38 (1) 42-48; DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.108.061192

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
A 3-Dimensional Mathematic Cylinder Phantom for the Evaluation of the Fundamental Performance of SPECT
Hideo Onishi, Nobutoku Motomura, Masaaki Takahashi, Masamichi Yanagisawa, Koichi Ogawa
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Mar 2010, 38 (1) 42-48; DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.108.061192
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Early 10-Minute Postinjection [18F]F-FAPI-42 uEXPLORER Total-Body PET/CT Scanning Protocol for Staging Lung Cancer Using HYPER Iterative Reconstruction
  • Single- Versus Dual-Time-Point Imaging for Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloid Using 99mTc-Pyrophosphate
  • Software Discrepancies in Radionuclide-Derived Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction
Show more Imaging

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire