Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
      • JNMT Supplement
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Continuing Education
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Contact
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Continuing Education
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Contact
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Follow SNMMI on Twitter
  • Visit SNMMI on Facebook
  • Join SNMMI on LinkedIn
  • Subscribe to JNMT RSS feeds
CorrectionDEPARTMENTS

Erratum

Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology June 2007, 35 (2) 99;
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

In the article “Nuclear Medicine Technologists in the U.S.: Findings from a 2005 Survey” prepared by the Center for Health Workforce Studies (the Center) (JNMT. 2006;34:244–249), the data on states with the highest and lowest numbers of nuclear medicine technologists per 1,000,000 in population were incorrect. The sentence reporting the range should read, “At the high end of the spectrum were South Dakota (160), West Virginia (143), and Delaware (135), and at the low end were the District of Columbia (23), Kansas (36), and Idaho (38).” Nebraska was not near the top of the range, and Oklahoma and Nevada were not near the bottom. Oklahoma had 62 nuclear medicine technologists per million, and Nebraska had 78 per million. Nevada had a total of 180 nuclear medicine technologists at the time of the survey (77 per million). The Center regrets the errors.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology: 35 (2)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
Vol. 35, Issue 2
June 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Erratum
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology web site.
Citation Tools
Erratum
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Jun 2007, 35 (2) 99;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Erratum
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Jun 2007, 35 (2) 99;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Nuclear Medicine Technologists in the U.S.: Findings from a 2005 Survey
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Technologist News
  • Information for Authors
  • Message From the President
Show more DEPARTMENTS

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2023 Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

Powered by HighWire