Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
      • JNMT Supplement
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Watch or Listen to JNMT Podcast
  • Visit SNMMI on Facebook
  • Join SNMMI on LinkedIn
  • Follow SNMMI on Twitter
  • Subscribe to JNMT RSS feeds
OtherIMAGING

Interdepartmental Audit with an Anatomically Realistic Lung Phantom

Jari O. Heikkinen, Jyrki T. Kuikka and Pentti J. Rautio
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology March 2006, 34 (1) 34-42;
Jari O. Heikkinen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jyrki T. Kuikka
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pentti J. Rautio
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1. 

    Radiograph of plastic lung models inside thorax phantom.

  • FIGURE 2. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2. 

    Case 1: chosen patient radiographs (A) and defects inside lung containers (B). Same containers were used for both perfusion simulation and ventilation simulation. AP = anterior; LAO = left anterior oblique; LPO = left posterior oblique; PA = posterior; RAO = right anterior oblique; RPO = right posterior oblique.

  • FIGURE 3. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3. 

    Case 2: chosen patient radiographs (A) and defects inside lung containers (B). AP = anterior; LAO = left anterior oblique; LPO = left posterior oblique; PA = posterior; RAO = right anterior oblique; RPO = right posterior oblique.

  • FIGURE 4. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4. 

    Case 3: defects inside technical containers. AP = anterior; LAO = left anterior oblique; LPO = left posterior oblique; PA = posterior; RAO = right anterior oblique; RPO = right posterior oblique.

  • FIGURE 5. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 5. 

    Histogram of individual results sent to all participating hospitals. Numbers of image sets in different hospitals are shown on x-axis and scores on y-axis. Mean values of scores, together with their own results, were sent to each hospital. Hospitals are coded to maintain anonymity.

  • FIGURE 6. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 6. 

    Example of static perfusion images for case 1 from hospital B.

  • FIGURE 7. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 7. 

    Example of static images for case 2 from hospital PQ: perfusion (A) and ventilation (B). Ant = anterior; DEX = right; LAO = left anterior oblique; LPO = left posterior oblique; Post = posterior; RAO = right anterior oblique; RPO = right posterior oblique; SIN = left.

  • FIGURE 8. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 8. 

    SPECT images of phantom with technical lung containers.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Acquisition Parameters for Standard Lung Perfusion and Ventilation Imaging in 18 Participating Hospitals

    HospitalCamera age (y)CollimatorMatrixPatient positionPerfusion dose (MBq)No. of projectionsFrame (kcts or time)Ventilation methodDose (MBq)Frame (kcts or time)No. of projections
    TU8HR512Supine1116300 sVenticol740600 s6
    IJ10AP256Supine504300 sVenticol1,100300 s4
    B6HR256Supine1856600Venticol111–1,1101004
    H10HS256Supine1306600Solcovent2,0003006
    E10GP256Supine1486700Technegas22–33300 s4
    PQ13HR128Supine1858130 sSolcovent2,220180 s8
    PQ210AP128Supine156600+tSolcovent2,220600+t6
    V115GP256Supine1106600Technegas20–402006
    V210AP128Supine1106600Technegas20–402006
    FG16AP128Supine111–1586600Technegas3704006
    R8HR128Supine11061,000+tVenticol900400+t6
    N12HR128Supine185690 sVenticol740150+t6
    Z16AP128Supine1484600Technegas374004
    S12AP256Supine1006400Technegas4002006
    XY4GP128Supine1006120 sTechnegas300120 s6
    M12HS128Supine746400Venticol1,3004006
    K21GP256Supine11041,000Aerosol740300 s4
    O1AP256Supine150–185890 sTechnegas150–400120 s8
    CD11GP256Supine1114400Venticol740150–3004
    L15GP256Sitting744600/500Ultravent1,4803004
    • HR = high resolution; AP = all purpose; HS = high sensitivity; GP = general purpose; 600+t = first frame is images at 600 kcts and rest are with same time.

    • Hospitals are coded to maintain anonymity.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Ranking of Lung Phantom Image Sets

    ParameterMaximum points
    Colors, shade, contrast4
    Material (shine/blurred, manageability, etc.)3
    Notes (projections, counts, etc.)2
    Layout2
    Visibility of lesions8
    Number of projections8
    Total27
    • Final points were summed and normalized to 10.

    • View popup
    TABLE 3

    Ranking of Lung Reports

    ParameterMaximum pointsAverageSD
    Structure21.310.62
    Length10.820.33
    Comparison between perfusion and ventilation21.580.53
    Acquired projections mentioned10.750.52
    Comparison to radiologic findings10.950.11
    Conclusions31.870.62
    Findings10.780.35
    Extent32.250.64
    Additional findings31.010.71
    Total17
    • Final points were summed and normalized to 10.

    • View popup
    TABLE 4

    Results of Lung Survey

    HospitalOverallReportImage setTechnical 1Technical 2
    TU8.510.07.28.28.4
    IJ8.59.97.48.08.2
    B8.38.87.19.28.9
    H8.18.77.09.46.8
    E7.99.08.35.46.6
    PQ7.85.99.08.610.0
    V7.87.96.79.58.3
    FG7.88.19.74.25.7
    R7.57.28.55.59.1
    N7.26.87.66.69.1
    Z7.28.55.96.87.8
    S6.76.85.88.07.1
    XY6.56.98.51.67.1
    M5.94.86.17.17.5
    K5.85.75.75.86.8
    O5.75.17.13.08.9
    CD5.64.76.94.65.9
    L5.25.34.85.27.3
    Average7.17.27.26.57.8
    SD1.11.71.32.31.2
    • Technical 1 = local interpreters; technical 2 = expert.

    • Hospitals are coded to maintain anonymity.

    • View popup
    TABLE 5

    Percentage Visibility of Defects Inside Technical Containers (Case 3) in All 8 Planar Views According to Participating Hospitals' Readers

    DefectVisibility (%)
    Size (cm3)SideAPPALPORPOLAORAOLeftRight
    2.5Right395182100†100†
    2.5Right*90658296†
    2.5Left*1675100†100†59100†
    2.0Left9247699292
    2.0Left*869100†6396
    2.0Right*2996†61
    1.5Right90†277578
    1.5Left499092†
    1.5Right*273753†
    1.5Right*1033†14
    1.0Right1629†16
    1.0Right29164143†
    1.0Left4455355†
    1.0Left*10162041†
    1.0Left*1214†2
    1.0Right*121020†
    0.7Left14†486
    0.7Right6†
    0.7Left18†18†14
    0.7Right4
    0.7Right812†
    0.7Left12†12†12†28
    • ↵* Defect was in medial side of lung insert.

    • ↵† Maximal percentage visibility for each defect.

    • AP = anterior; LAO = left anterior oblique; LPO = left posterior oblique; PA = posterior; RAO = right anterior oblique; RPO = right posterior oblique.

    • View popup
    TABLE 6

    Comparison of Sensitivity for Detecting Lesions vs. Number of Views

    ViewSensitivity (%)P
    AP–PALPO–RPOLAO–RAOLeft–right37.7
    AP–PALPO–RPOLAO–RAO35.10.006*
    AP–PALPO–RPO32.40.001*
    AP–PA27.00.002*
    AP–PALAO–RAO32.10.014*
    AP–PALeft–right35.90.140
    AP–PALPO–RPOLeft–right36.70.057
    AP–PALAO–RAOLeft–right36.60.199
    LPO–RPOLAO–RAO42.20.040*
    LPO–RPOLAO–RAOLeft–right42.80.006*
    Left–right44.90.006*
    • ↵* Statistically significant (P < 0.05) variation compared with all 8 views.

    • AP = anterior; LAO = left anterior oblique; LPO = left posterior oblique; PA = posterior; RAO = right anterior oblique; RPO = right posterior oblique.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology: 34 (1)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
Vol. 34, Issue 1
March 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Interdepartmental Audit with an Anatomically Realistic Lung Phantom
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology web site.
Citation Tools
Interdepartmental Audit with an Anatomically Realistic Lung Phantom
Jari O. Heikkinen, Jyrki T. Kuikka, Pentti J. Rautio
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Mar 2006, 34 (1) 34-42;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Interdepartmental Audit with an Anatomically Realistic Lung Phantom
Jari O. Heikkinen, Jyrki T. Kuikka, Pentti J. Rautio
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Mar 2006, 34 (1) 34-42;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Early 10-Minute Postinjection [18F]F-FAPI-42 uEXPLORER Total-Body PET/CT Scanning Protocol for Staging Lung Cancer Using HYPER Iterative Reconstruction
  • Single- Versus Dual-Time-Point Imaging for Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloid Using 99mTc-Pyrophosphate
  • Robustness of 18F-FDG PET Radiomic Features in Lung Cancer: Impact of Advanced Reconstruction Algorithm
Show more Imaging

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire