Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
      • JNMT Supplement
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Watch or Listen to JNMT Podcast
  • Visit SNMMI on Facebook
  • Join SNMMI on LinkedIn
  • Follow SNMMI on Twitter
  • Subscribe to JNMT RSS feeds
OtherPROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT

Evaluation of Current and Projected Nuclear Medicine Technology Curriculum

Mary Anne Owen, Anthony W. Knight, Gregory Passmore and LeRoy H. Stecker
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology September 2005, 33 (3) 186-189;
Mary Anne Owen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anthony W. Knight
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gregory Passmore
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
LeRoy H. Stecker III
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Program Offering by Terminal Degree

    Terminal degreeNumber of programs (n = 32)
    Certificate15 (47%)
    Associate3 (9%)
    Baccalaureate14 (44%)
    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Percentage of Programs Requiring Various Prerequisite Courses

    Prerequisite courses
    Physics62%
    Biology29%
    Anatomy and physiology22%
    Anatomy and physiology II38%
    Pre-calculus/trigonometry9%
    College algebra49%
    Intermediate algebra4%
    Statistics20%
    Medical terminology20%
    English31%
    Introduction to computers22%
    Speech and communications20%
    • View popup
    TABLE 3

    Professional Programs Vary in Length

    Length of professional program (in months)Number of programs (n = 54)
    485 (10%)
    331 (2%)
    247 (13%)
    225 (10%)
    211 (2%)
    201 (2%)
    182 (4%)
    155 (10%)
    131 (2%)
    1226 (47%)
    • View popup
    TABLE 4

    Didactic Effort Expended on PET Education

    Classroom hours spent on PET educationNumber of programs (n = 54)
    00
    1–32 (4%)
    3–58 (15%)
    6–1016 (29%)
    11–156 (11%)
    >1522 (41%)
    • View popup
    TABLE 5

    Clinical Effort Expended on PET Education

    Hours spent by students in clinical PET or PET/CT practicumNumber of programs (n = 53)
    01 (2%)
    1–82 (4%)
    8–166 (11%)
    17–324 (8%)
    33–406 (11%)
    41–8015 (28%)
    81–1206 (11%)
    >12013 (25%)
    • View popup
    TABLE 6

    Didactic Effort Expended on CT Education

    Classroom hours spent on CT educationNumber of programs (n = 52)
    020 (38%)
    1–315 (29%)
    3–57 (13%)
    6–105 (10%)
    11–152 (4%)
    >153 (6%)
    • View popup
    TABLE 7

    Clinical Effort Expended on CT Education

    Hours spent by students in clinical CT practicumNumber of programs (n = 54)
    022 (41%)
    1–89 (17%)
    8–163 (5%)
    17–324 (7%)
    33–402 (4%)
    41–806 (11%)
    81–1201 (2%)
    >1207 (13%)
    • View popup
    TABLE 8

    Didactic Effort Expended on MRI Education

    Classroom hours spent on MRI educationNumber of programs (n = 51)
    041 (80%)
    1–39 (18%)
    3–51 (2%)
    >50
    • View popup
    TABLE 9

    Clinical Effort Expended on MRI Education

    Hours spent by students in clinical MRI practicumNumber of programs (n = 52)
    040 (77%)
    1–89 (18%)
    8–162 (4%)
    17–320
    33–401 (2%)
    >400
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology: 33 (3)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
Vol. 33, Issue 3
September 1, 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Evaluation of Current and Projected Nuclear Medicine Technology Curriculum
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology web site.
Citation Tools
Evaluation of Current and Projected Nuclear Medicine Technology Curriculum
Mary Anne Owen, Anthony W. Knight, Gregory Passmore, LeRoy H. Stecker
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Sep 2005, 33 (3) 186-189;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Evaluation of Current and Projected Nuclear Medicine Technology Curriculum
Mary Anne Owen, Anthony W. Knight, Gregory Passmore, LeRoy H. Stecker
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Sep 2005, 33 (3) 186-189;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Comparison of Large Language Models’ Performance on 600 Nuclear Medicine Technology Board Examination–Style Questions
  • A Multiradionuclide Automatic Dispensing System for Syringes of Radiopharmaceuticals: The Effect on Operator Hand Dose
  • The Impact of COVID-19 on First-Year Undergraduate Nuclear Medicine Students’ Practical Skills Training
Show more Professional Development

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire