Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
      • JNMT Supplement
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Watch or Listen to JNMT Podcast
  • Visit SNMMI on Facebook
  • Join SNMMI on LinkedIn
  • Follow SNMMI on Twitter
  • Subscribe to JNMT RSS feeds
OtherPROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT

Evaluation of Current and Projected Nuclear Medicine Technology Curriculum

Mary Anne Owen, Anthony W. Knight, Gregory Passmore and LeRoy H. Stecker
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology September 2005, 33 (3) 186-189;
Mary Anne Owen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anthony W. Knight
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gregory Passmore
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
LeRoy H. Stecker III
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

New advancements in multimodal imaging and therapy, and increasing demands for accountability and outcomes documentation require increasing levels of knowledge and skill not easily delivered within the current structure for entry-level educational programs in nuclear medicine technology (NMT). The “needs assessment” process provides a systematic method for determining how best to fulfill emerging and projected practice requirements. The certification opportunities offered through the Nuclear Medicine Technology Certification Board and the American Registry of Radiologic Technologists in CT, PET, MRI, and emerging fusion technologies are just the first in a series of documented assessments of continuing education attempting to meet quickly evolving technology environments. This article provides an analysis of 2 recent surveys of existing nuclear medicine technology education programs to assess existing entry-level curricula and curriculum enhancements that address traditional and emergent practice knowledge and skills.

The formal academic nuclear medicine technology education system is accredited through the Joint Review Committee on Educational Programs in Nuclear Medicine Technology (JRCNMT). Education is overseen and delivered through divergent entry-level educational programs offered through hospitals, community colleges, universities, and academic medical centers. Data yielded from surveys of NMT program directors and a review of NMT program prerequisites will provide guidance in designing programs for NMT education of the future.

2005 Review of Course Prerequisites for Nuclear Medicine Technology Programs Published on Institutional Websites

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-two Web sites for nuclear medicine technology programs accredited by the JRCNMT were reviewed for published prerequisite courses required before applicant acceptance. This data is reported as percentage values and compared with mandatory requirements for prerequisites as outlined in the Essentials and Guidelines for an Accredited Educational Program for the Nuclear Medicine Technologist (last revised in 2003) published by the JRCNMT (www.jrcnmt.org)

RESULTS

Program Offering by Terminal Degree

Nuclear medicine technology programs offer varying levels of terminal degree including certificate, associate, and baccalaureate. Programs reviewed were similarly matched in numbers to those offered nationally. The greatest number of programs, 47%, are offered at the certificate level, with a slightly fewer programs terminating in a baccalaureate degree, 44% (Table 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Program Offering by Terminal Degree

Evaluation of Prerequisite Courses

The minimum courses suggested by the JRCNMT before professional program admission are physics or physical science, chemistry, English I and II, oral communication, statistics, and computer skills. If not acquired as part of preprofessional education, these courses may be delivered concurrently with the professional NMT curriculum. Additional courses listed below are required as part of the NMT curriculum. When these courses are acquired before the professional program, additional time is available in the NMT curriculum for depth of instruction in professional content areas. Baccalaureate programs generally require additional math, science, and liberal arts as part of the preprofessional core curriculum that is acquired in the freshman, sophomore, and junior division courses before admission to the 12- to 20-month professional program that completes the baccalaureate degree (Table 2).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2

Percentage of Programs Requiring Various Prerequisite Courses

2005 Survey of Nuclear Medicine Technologist Program Directors

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Surveys were electronically distributed to 117 directors of nuclear medicine technology programs accredited by the JRCNMT. Fifty-four surveys were returned for a 46% response rate, although not every respondent answered every item. Number of respondents is given for each item in the tables below. The survey sampled responses for a broad range of program information including student demographics, graduate demographics, program director demographics, and entry-level curriculum enhancement. This article presents information related to program director responses for enhancements currently offered for CT, PET, PET/CT, and MRI in existing programs.

RESULTS

Length of Professional Program

The length of the clinical and didactic phases of the professional NMT programs included in this survey ranged from 12 to 48 mo (Table 3). The greatest number of professional programs, 32, or 59%, fell in the 12–15 mo range. Of the remaining programs, 9 deliver the professional education sequence in 18 to 22 mo, and only 13 programs enroll students in clinical and didactic phases for 24 mo or longer.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3

Professional Programs Vary in Length

PET Didactic and Clinical Education

When asked how many classroom contact hours entry-level NMT programs provided in PET education, all programs reported PET as part of their curriculum (Table 4). Twenty-eight programs, or 52%, reported 11 or more hours of classroom PET education. Twenty-six, or 48%, of programs indicated that students receive 10 or fewer hours of didactic PET instruction.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 4

Didactic Effort Expended on PET Education

When asked how many clinical contact hours entry-level NMT programs provided in PET or PET/CT, only one program reported that students received no clinical PET experience (Table 5). Thirty-four respondents, or 64%, reported that students spend at least 41 h (>five days) in clinical PET rotations. Only 13, or 25%, of the programs reporting indicated clinical experiences of greater than 120 h (15 d) in PET. Approximately 36% of programs reported that students spent 40 h or less in a clinical PET rotation with 17% of these students spending 16 h or less of their total clinical program time in PET.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 5

Clinical Effort Expended on PET Education

CT Didactic and Clinical Education

When asked how many classroom contact hours entry-level NMT programs provided in CT education, 32 programs, or approximately 64% reported CT as part of the NMT professional didactic curriculum (Table 6). However, of these, only 5 reported greater than 10 classroom hours of instruction in CT.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 6

Didactic Effort Expended on CT Education

When asked how many clinical contact hours entry-level NMT programs provided in CT or PET/CT, only 23 respondents, or 42%, reported that students receive more than 8 h of clinical CT experience (Table 7). Of these, only 8 programs reported greater than 80 h (10 d) at clinical CT or PET/CT rotations. Twenty-two programs, or 41% of those reporting, provide no clinical CT experience for students.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 7

Clinical Effort Expended on CT Education

MRI Clinical and Didactic Education

When asked how many classroom contact hours entry-level NMT programs provided in MRI education, only 10 programs reported that MRI was included as part of professional didactic phase, and only one program reported that students receive more than 3 h (Table 8). No program provided greater than 5 h of MRI education. Forty-one respondents (80%) reported no MRI in the didactic curriculum.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 8

Didactic Effort Expended on MRI Education

When asked how many clinical contact hours entry-level NMT programs provided in MRI, only 12 respondents, or 23%, reported that students receive clinical experience (Table 9). Of these, only one program reported 33 h (4 d) or more in clinical MRI rotations.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 9

Clinical Effort Expended on MRI Education

DISCUSSION

An evaluation of entry-level NMT programs suggests that didactic and clinical education is disparate and varied across the nation. The instructional curriculum directed by the JRCNMT continues to grow with the addition of PET to the didactic curriculum in the last 2 years and needs, in consideration of CT and MRI, to prepare the technologist workforce for fusion technologies. JRCNMT requires documentation of student knowledge and skill competency in the wide range of tasks necessary for practice performance. Guidelines for NMT didactic and clinical instruction in the JRCNMT Essentials and Guidelines for an Accredited Educational Program for the Nuclear Medicine Technologist include:

  1. Methods of patient care;

  2. Statistics;

  3. Nuclear medicine physics and radiation physics;

  4. Radiation biology;

  5. Radiation safety and protection;

  6. Radionuclide chemistry and radiopharmacy;

  7. Nuclear instrumentation;

  8. PET;

  9. Computer applications for nuclear medicine;

  10. Diagnostic nuclear medicine imaging and nonimaging in vivo and in vitro procedures;

  11. Radionuclide therapy; and

  12. Quality control and quality assurance.

Instructional guidelines for professional development in the Essentials and Guidelines include:

  1. The development of problem-solving, critical-thinking, and decision-making skills in oral and written communication, human relations, and patient services;

  2. Familiarity with applicable medical law and ethics;

  3. A commitment to make a significant contribution to the healthcare team;

  4. An appreciation and respect for cultural diversity;

  5. A holistic caregiver’s perspective;

  6. An understanding of departmental organization and function in relation to the healthcare delivery system as a whole; and

  7. An understanding of the value and responsibilities entailed in being a professional.

The majority of programs deliver this education within a 12- to 15-month time frame. A limited number of programs provide didactic and clinical education in PET and PET/CT. Only a handful of NMT programs offer didactic and clinical education in MRI.

CONCLUSION

Based on the volume of competency performance required in accredited NMT programs, this study suggests that there are many challenges to presenting the breadth and depth of knowledge and skills needed for the near and projected future. Nuclear medicine technology programs are currently offered in a wide variety of nonstandard formats. Didactic and clinical education that responds to changing trends in routine and advanced technology practice may need careful review by the professional bodies that guide and oversee NMT training. Quickly evolving practice needs necessitate creative strategies to optimize academic and continuing education opportunities and to assure meaningful learning of NMT knowledge and skills.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology: 33 (3)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
Vol. 33, Issue 3
September 1, 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Evaluation of Current and Projected Nuclear Medicine Technology Curriculum
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology web site.
Citation Tools
Evaluation of Current and Projected Nuclear Medicine Technology Curriculum
Mary Anne Owen, Anthony W. Knight, Gregory Passmore, LeRoy H. Stecker
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Sep 2005, 33 (3) 186-189;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Evaluation of Current and Projected Nuclear Medicine Technology Curriculum
Mary Anne Owen, Anthony W. Knight, Gregory Passmore, LeRoy H. Stecker
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Sep 2005, 33 (3) 186-189;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Comparison of Large Language Models’ Performance on 600 Nuclear Medicine Technology Board Examination–Style Questions
  • A Multiradionuclide Automatic Dispensing System for Syringes of Radiopharmaceuticals: The Effect on Operator Hand Dose
  • The Impact of COVID-19 on First-Year Undergraduate Nuclear Medicine Students’ Practical Skills Training
Show more Professional Development

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire