Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
      • JNMT Supplement
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Watch or Listen to JNMT Podcast
  • Visit SNMMI on Facebook
  • Join SNMMI on LinkedIn
  • Follow SNMMI on Twitter
  • Subscribe to JNMT RSS feeds
OtherLABORATORY METHODS

Measurement of 18F-FDG Concentrations in Blood Samples: Comparison of Direct Calibration and Standard Solution Methods

Henri N.J.M. Greuter, Ronald Boellaard, Arthur van Lingen, Eric J.F. Franssen and Adriaan A. Lammertsma
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology December 2003, 31 (4) 206-209;
Henri N.J.M. Greuter
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ronald Boellaard
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Arthur van Lingen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eric J.F. Franssen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Adriaan A. Lammertsma
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Ratio of activity concentration (AC) determined with standard solution and calibration factor method for 1 y. Slightly declining slope indicates that adjustment of calibration factors is required about yearly.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    Ratio of activity concentration (AC) standard/calibration factor methods versus mass of patient dose. Observed large variation in this ratio is explained by uncertainties of measurements, which were required for preparation of standard solutions.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology: 31 (4)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
Vol. 31, Issue 4
December 1, 2003
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Measurement of 18F-FDG Concentrations in Blood Samples: Comparison of Direct Calibration and Standard Solution Methods
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology web site.
Citation Tools
Measurement of 18F-FDG Concentrations in Blood Samples: Comparison of Direct Calibration and Standard Solution Methods
Henri N.J.M. Greuter, Ronald Boellaard, Arthur van Lingen, Eric J.F. Franssen, Adriaan A. Lammertsma
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Dec 2003, 31 (4) 206-209;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Measurement of 18F-FDG Concentrations in Blood Samples: Comparison of Direct Calibration and Standard Solution Methods
Henri N.J.M. Greuter, Ronald Boellaard, Arthur van Lingen, Eric J.F. Franssen, Adriaan A. Lammertsma
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Dec 2003, 31 (4) 206-209;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Multiregional Tumor Drug-Uptake Imaging by PET and Microvascular Morphology in End-Stage Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma
  • PET/CT-Derived Whole-Body and Bone Marrow Dosimetry of 89Zr-Cetuximab
  • A Curve-Fitting Approach to Estimate the Arterial Plasma Input Function for the Assessment of Glucose Metabolic Rate and Response to Treatment
  • Comparison of Tumor Volumes Derived from Glucose Metabolic Rate Maps and SUV Maps in Dynamic 18F-FDG PET
  • Comparison of Image-Derived and Arterial Input Functions for Estimating the Rate of Glucose Metabolism in Therapy-Monitoring 18F-FDG PET Studies
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire