Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
      • JNMT Supplement
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Watch or Listen to JNMT Podcast
  • Visit SNMMI on Facebook
  • Join SNMMI on LinkedIn
  • Follow SNMMI on Twitter
  • Subscribe to JNMT RSS feeds
OtherIMAGING

Evaluation of 2 Scatter Correction Methods Using a Striatal Phantom for Quantitative Brain SPECT

Douglass C. Vines, Masanori Ichise, Jeih-San Liow, Hiroshi Toyama and Robert B. Innis
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology September 2003, 31 (3) 157-160;
Douglass C. Vines
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Masanori Ichise
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeih-San Liow
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hiroshi Toyama
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert B. Innis
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Photograph of RS-901T striatal phantom. (Courtesy of Radiology Support Devices Inc.)

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    Transaxial images of striatal phantom with 10:1 striatal-to-background ratio: with no scatter correction (A), with ES scatter correction (B), and with TDCS scatter correction (C). Striatal ROI indicates only pixels in top 2% of striatum and may vary in location for different methods. Background (BKG) ROIs are the same for all methods.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    Relationship between expected and measured striatal-to-background ratios. Each series was fitted with linear regression line. SC = scatter correction.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1
    Expected ratioNo scatter correctionESTDCS
    STRBKGRatioSTRBKGRatioSTRBKGRatio
    26864161.65733141.85552632.1
    56662193.05831653.55931344.4
    106761225.5610946.5629718.8
    15694947.47136211.57654915.6
    208167610.77485613.37784019.4
    258356413.07414416.88123324.6
    • legend STR = striatal counts per pixel; BKG = background counts per pixel; ratio = STR/BKG.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology: 31 (3)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
Vol. 31, Issue 3
September 1, 2003
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Evaluation of 2 Scatter Correction Methods Using a Striatal Phantom for Quantitative Brain SPECT
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology web site.
Citation Tools
Evaluation of 2 Scatter Correction Methods Using a Striatal Phantom for Quantitative Brain SPECT
Douglass C. Vines, Masanori Ichise, Jeih-San Liow, Hiroshi Toyama, Robert B. Innis
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Sep 2003, 31 (3) 157-160;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Evaluation of 2 Scatter Correction Methods Using a Striatal Phantom for Quantitative Brain SPECT
Douglass C. Vines, Masanori Ichise, Jeih-San Liow, Hiroshi Toyama, Robert B. Innis
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Sep 2003, 31 (3) 157-160;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Early 10-Minute Postinjection [18F]F-FAPI-42 uEXPLORER Total-Body PET/CT Scanning Protocol for Staging Lung Cancer Using HYPER Iterative Reconstruction
  • Single- Versus Dual-Time-Point Imaging for Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloid Using 99mTc-Pyrophosphate
  • Does Arthrography Improve Accuracy of SPECT/CT for Diagnosis of Aseptic Loosening in Patients with Painful Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis
Show more Imaging

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire