Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
      • JNMT Supplement
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Watch or Listen to JNMT Podcast
  • Visit SNMMI on Facebook
  • Join SNMMI on LinkedIn
  • Follow SNMMI on Twitter
  • Subscribe to JNMT RSS feeds
OtherRADIATION SAFETY

Measuring and Minimizing the Radiation Dose to Nuclear Medicine Technologists

Thea M. Lundberg, Peta J. Gray and Marissa L. Bartlett
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology March 2002, 30 (1) 25-30;
Thea M. Lundberg
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peta J. Gray
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marissa L. Bartlett
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Relationship between daily doses recorded at back waist and at front waist. Line of best fit excludes single anomalous point. Correlation coefficient = 0.91. Line of best fit: back = 0.29 × front + 0.49.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    Ratio of back-waist dose to front-waist dose for 30-min intervals plotted against front-waist dose. Technologist was known to be scanning patients during these intervals. Dashed line indicates slope of graph for back-waist daily dose vs. front-waist daily dose (shown in Fig. 1).

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    Relationship between daily doses recorded at collar and at waist. Line of identity is shown. Correlation coefficient = 0.90.

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    Relationship between daily doses recorded at collar and at waist: plotted separately for days spent in scanning rooms and days spent performing injections. Ratio of collar to waist is 1.1 ± 0.3 (mean ± SD) for scanning days and 1.7 ± 0.3 (mean ± SD) for injection days.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Typical Administered Activities for Different Types of Scans

    ScanIsotopeTypical activity (MBq)μSv/h*n
    GHPS99mTc9001.9 ± 1.39
    MIBI
     Stress cardiac scan99mTc1,0001.8 ± 1.48
     Rest cardiac scan99mTc3000.9 ± 0.64
    131I scan after therapy131I20 μSv/h at 1 m → ∼3500.8 ± 1.410
    Ventilation/perfusion lung scan99mTc500 + 2200.8 ± 0.728
    Bone scan99mTc9000.8 ± 0.634
    Labeled white blood cells99mTc8000.7 ± 0.76
    67Ga tumor scan67Ga3700.7 ± 0.38
    Thyroid scan99mTc1500.4 ± 0.34
    Renal scan99mTc1800.4 ± 0.426
    Stress cardiac scan201Tl1000.4 ± 0.56
    Rest cardiac scan201Tl400.2 ± 0.16
    Brain SPECT99mTc900—2
    • ↵* Mean ± SD.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology: 30 (1)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
Vol. 30, Issue 1
March 1, 2002
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Measuring and Minimizing the Radiation Dose to Nuclear Medicine Technologists
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology web site.
Citation Tools
Measuring and Minimizing the Radiation Dose to Nuclear Medicine Technologists
Thea M. Lundberg, Peta J. Gray, Marissa L. Bartlett
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Mar 2002, 30 (1) 25-30;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Measuring and Minimizing the Radiation Dose to Nuclear Medicine Technologists
Thea M. Lundberg, Peta J. Gray, Marissa L. Bartlett
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Mar 2002, 30 (1) 25-30;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Delivery Methods of Radiopharmaceuticals: Exploring Global Strategies to Minimize Occupational Radiation Exposure
  • Cancer and circulatory disease risks in US radiologic technologists associated with performing procedures involving radionuclides
  • Radiation Dose in Close Proximity to Patients After Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: Potential Implications for Hospital Personnel and the Public
  • Occupational Radiation Dosimetry Assessment Using an Automated Infusion Device for Positron-Emitting Radiotracers
  • Radiation Dose to Technologists per Nuclear Medicine Examination and Estimation of Annual Dose
  • Assessment of Patient Exposure to X-Radiation from SPECT/CT Scanners
  • Radiation dose measurements for personnel performing 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan administration: a comparison between two injection methods for dose reduction
  • Review of Common Occupational Hazards and Safety Concerns for Nuclear Medicine Technologists
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Diagnostic Reference Levels in PET Imaging at Chulabhorn Hospital, Thailand
  • Experiences of Nuclear Medicine Technologists Working in PET/CT Facilities in Gauteng Province, South Africa
  • Establishment of National Diagnostic Reference Levels for Administered Activity in Diagnostic Nuclear Medicine in Thailand
Show more RADIATION SAFETY

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire