Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
      • JNMT Supplement
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Watch or Listen to JNMT Podcast
  • Visit SNMMI on Facebook
  • Join SNMMI on LinkedIn
  • Follow SNMMI on Twitter
  • Subscribe to JNMT RSS feeds
OtherIMAGING

Minimum Detectable Defect Thickness in SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Test: Phantom Study with 99mTc and 201Tl

Abdelhamid A. Elkamhawy and Harish Chandna
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology December 2001, 29 (4) 183-188;
Abdelhamid A. Elkamhawy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Harish Chandna
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Locations of defects inside myocardial phantom. D = thickness (depth) of the defect.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    Example of short-axis, vertical long-axis, and horizontal long-axis slices showing nonuniformity of baseline SPECT images.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    Phantom SPECT images for ROR = 29.2 cm, with 99mTc (row A) and 201Tl (row B) where 5 defects with thickness D = 6 mm were inserted. All defects are clearly detected with both tracers except defect located in SEP region in 201Tl study.

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    Phantom SPECT images with 99mTc (row A) and 201Tl (row B) at ROR = 25.0 cm. Four defects of 22.5 × 22.5 × 4 mm3 (∼ 2 mL) were fixed at ANT, SEP, IP, and LAT regions. All defects were detected with 99mTc; only the defect located in IP region was detected with 201Tl.

  • FIGURE 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 5.

    Phantom SPECT images for ROR = 25.0 cm with 99mTc (row A). Two 1-mL defects were inserted into ANT, SEP, IP, and LAT regions. All 6-mm defects are clearly seen; 3-mm defects are visible in IP region only.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Average Density Ratios for Baseline SPECT Images

    IsotopeROR (cm)Average density ratio
    ANT/IPSEP/LAT
    99mTc21.01.101.05
    25.01.071.05
    29.21.051.03
    201Tl21.01.181.05
    25.01.121.03
    29.21.081.01
    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Minimum Detectable Defect Thickness for 99mTc and 201Tl

    IsotopeROR (cm)Dmin (mm; percentage of myocardial phantom wall thickness)
    ANTSEPIPLATAP
    99mTc21.04  (33%)4  (33%)2  (16%)4  (33%)3  (25%)
    25.04  (33%)4  (33%)2  (16%)4  (33%)4  (33%)
    29.24  (33%)5  (43%)3  (25%)4  (33%)4  (33%)
    201Tl21.06  (50%)6  (50%)3  (25%)5  (43%)4  (33%)
    25.06  (50%)6  (50%)3  (25%)6  (50%)4  (33%)
    29.26  (50%)7  (58%)4  (33%)6  (50%)4  (33%)
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology: 29 (4)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
Vol. 29, Issue 4
December 1, 2001
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Minimum Detectable Defect Thickness in SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Test: Phantom Study with 99mTc and 201Tl
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology web site.
Citation Tools
Minimum Detectable Defect Thickness in SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Test: Phantom Study with 99mTc and 201Tl
Abdelhamid A. Elkamhawy, Harish Chandna
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Dec 2001, 29 (4) 183-188;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Minimum Detectable Defect Thickness in SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Test: Phantom Study with 99mTc and 201Tl
Abdelhamid A. Elkamhawy, Harish Chandna
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Dec 2001, 29 (4) 183-188;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Early 10-Minute Postinjection [18F]F-FAPI-42 uEXPLORER Total-Body PET/CT Scanning Protocol for Staging Lung Cancer Using HYPER Iterative Reconstruction
  • Single- Versus Dual-Time-Point Imaging for Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloid Using 99mTc-Pyrophosphate
  • Robustness of 18F-FDG PET Radiomic Features in Lung Cancer: Impact of Advanced Reconstruction Algorithm
Show more Imaging

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire