Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
      • JNMT Supplement
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Watch or Listen to JNMT Podcast
  • Visit SNMMI on Facebook
  • Join SNMMI on LinkedIn
  • Follow SNMMI on Twitter
  • Subscribe to JNMT RSS feeds
Imaging

Radioactive Decay and Pallet Artifacts in SPECT Imaging

M.J. Feldkamp, M. L. Allen, W. W. Mohr, K. G. Baxter, D. F. Preston and R. G. Robinson
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology December 1991, 19 (4) 220-223;
M.J. Feldkamp
University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. L. Allen
University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
W. W. Mohr
University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K. G. Baxter
University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. F. Preston
University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. G. Robinson
University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Our purpose is to discuss two types of corrections for count loss that occur while performing SPECT studies. These corrections will improve image quality. Radioactive decay correction should be considered with the development of new short-lived radiopharmaceuticals for SPECT imaging, such as technetium-99m (99mTc) HMPAO. The count rate is reduced by approximately 8.3% from radioactive decay of 99mTc during a standard 45-min SPECT acquisition. This can easily be corrected by multiplying each frame in the raw data by the decay factor. Count loss also occurs due to the attenuation of the pallet as the camera rotates under the patient. Pallet attenuation can be visualized and calculated by doing a 360° acquisition of a SPECT phantom filled with 99mTc. We have evaluated the attenuation from different manufacturer’s pallets and head holders. There is as much as a 12.6% loss in count rate from the Siemens heavy-duty pallet and as little as 3.5% from the G.E. attachable head holder. A computer algorithm could be developed to correct for pallet attenuation, but the problem can be avoided by changing the system design for different types of SPECT acquisitions, especially when scanning the brain or heart. Some departments begin their SPECT acquisition in the posterior or lateral position and thereby compound the decay and pallet attenuation problems by causing the last few frames of the study to be acquired directly beneath the pallet where maximum attenuation will occur during maximum decay loss. Both the decay and pallet attenuation problems can combine to create as much as a 15%-20% loss of counts from the first to last image in a given 99mTc SPECT study.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology: 19 (4)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
Vol. 19, Issue 4
December 1, 1991
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Radioactive Decay and Pallet Artifacts in SPECT Imaging
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology web site.
Citation Tools
Radioactive Decay and Pallet Artifacts in SPECT Imaging
M.J. Feldkamp, M. L. Allen, W. W. Mohr, K. G. Baxter, D. F. Preston, R. G. Robinson
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Dec 1991, 19 (4) 220-223;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Radioactive Decay and Pallet Artifacts in SPECT Imaging
M.J. Feldkamp, M. L. Allen, W. W. Mohr, K. G. Baxter, D. F. Preston, R. G. Robinson
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Dec 1991, 19 (4) 220-223;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Brain SPECT Artifacts in Patients Having Metallic Cranioplasty
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Early 10-Minute Postinjection [18F]F-FAPI-42 uEXPLORER Total-Body PET/CT Scanning Protocol for Staging Lung Cancer Using HYPER Iterative Reconstruction
  • Single- Versus Dual-Time-Point Imaging for Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloid Using 99mTc-Pyrophosphate
  • Does Arthrography Improve Accuracy of SPECT/CT for Diagnosis of Aseptic Loosening in Patients with Painful Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis
Show more Imaging

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire