Skip to main content
  • Main menu
  • User menu
  • Search
  • English ▼
    • English
    • Afrikaans
    • Albanian
    • Amharic
    • Arabic
    • Armenian
    • Azerbaijani
    • Basque
    • Belarusian
    • Bengali
    • Bosnian
    • Bulgarian
    • Catalan
    • Cebuano
    • Chichewa
    • Chinese (Simplified)
    • Chinese (Traditional)
    • Corsican
    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Danish
    • Dutch
    • Esperanto
    • Estonian
    • Filipino
    • Finnish
    • French
    • Frisian
    • Galician
    • Georgian
    • German
    • Greek
    • Gujarati
    • Haitian Creole
    • Hausa
    • Hawaiian
    • Hebrew
    • Hindi
    • Hmong
    • Hungarian
    • Icelandic
    • Igbo
    • Indonesian
    • Irish
    • Italian
    • Japanese
    • Javanese
    • Kannada
    • Kazakh
    • Khmer
    • Korean
    • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
    • Kyrgyz
    • Lao
    • Latin
    • Latvian
    • Lithuanian
    • Luxembourgish
    • Macedonian
    • Malagasy
    • Malay
    • Malayalam
    • Maltese
    • Maori
    • Marathi
    • Mongolian
    • Myanmar (Burmese)
    • Nepali
    • Norwegian
    • Pashto
    • Persian
    • Polish
    • Portuguese
    • Punjabi
    • Romanian
    • Russian
    • Samoan
    • Scottish Gaelic
    • Serbian
    • Sesotho
    • Shona
    • Sindhi
    • Sinhala
    • Slovak
    • Slovenian
    • Somali
    • Spanish
    • Sudanese
    • Swahili
    • Swedish
    • Tajik
    • Tamil
    • Telugu
    • Thai
    • Turkish
    • Ukrainian
    • Urdu
    • Uzbek
    • Vietnamese
    • Welsh
    • Xhosa
    • Yiddish
    • Yoruba
    • Zulu

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
      • JNMT Supplement
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

Advanced Search

English ▼
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scottish Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sudanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu
  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Watch or Listen to JNMT Podcast
  • Visit SNMMI on Facebook
  • Join SNMMI on LinkedIn
  • Follow SNMMI on Twitter
  • Subscribe to JNMT RSS feeds
Research ArticleIMAGING

Detection of 90Y Extravasation by Bremsstrahlung Imaging for Patients Undergoing 90Y-Ibritumomab Tiuxetan Therapy

Stephanie M. Rhymer, J. Anthony Parker and Matthew R. Palmer
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology December 2010, 38 (4) 195-198; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.110.077354
Stephanie M. Rhymer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Anthony Parker
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthew R. Palmer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Extravasation of therapeutic 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan can cause significant injury. Detection of extravasated 90Y using a γ-camera for patients undergoing 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan therapy is a challenge because of the inherently low efficiency of bremsstrahlung imaging and the interference of prompt and scattered photons from 111In that are still present in the body at the time of 90Y injection. We have configured a γ-camera to image bremsstrahlung radiation from superficial 90Y in the presence of 111In and evaluated the effectiveness using phantoms. Methods: Phantoms were constructed to contain 90Y and 111In with activity levels and with a geometry approximating conditions in a patient being scanned for evaluation of possible extravasation in the antecubital fossa. Imaging was performed using a camera equipped with medium-energy general-purpose (MEGP) and high-energy general-purpose (HEGP) collimators. Results: The contrast that developed between the patch representing extravasated solution and the background was comparable for MEGP and HEGP collimators. With MEGP collimators and 5-min acquisitions, a patch containing 8.3 MBq (220 μCi) distributed over an elliptic area of 7 × 11 cm was clearly discernable. Conclusion: With our experimental arrangement, the lower limit of detection is approximately 8 MBq. We calculate that an extravasation of this much 90Y would result in an absorbed dose to the skin and subcutaneous tissue of 2.5 Gy, which is close to the threshold for skin damage. This technique is therefore sensitive enough to be of use in the clinic when extravasation of 90Y is suspected.

  • radiobiology/dosimetry
  • radionuclide therapy
  • bremsstrahlung imaging
  • extravasation
  • 90Y

Radioimmunotherapy is a cancer treatment modality that has grown in importance over the past decade. The combination of monoclonal antibodies and short-range radioisotopes is designed to deliver a localized radiation dose to specific targets. Used primarily in the treatment of low-grade, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, radioimmunotherapy with 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan (Zevalin; Biogen-Idec) is approved both for first-line therapy and for relapsed or recurrent lymphoma.

The potential for complications arising from extravasation of chemotherapeutics is well understood by medical oncologists (1). Extravasation is estimated to occur in 0.6%–6% of administrations (2). In the field of nuclear medicine however, there appears to be relatively few reports of side effects caused by extravasation of radiotherapeutic agents, and the expectation and degree of vigilance for this type of reaction are generally low. The dearth of reported tissue reactions related to the administration of therapeutic agents containing 32P, 153Sm, 89Sr, or 186Re may be attributable to the short residence times due to the rapid reabsorption of those agents. In the case of 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan, however, the large molecules could have a relatively slow clearance rate and thus pose a greater risk for radiation injury in the event of extravasation.

We previously reported on a case of radiation injury that occurred in our clinic (3). It was estimated that extravasation of between 68 and 136 MBq of 90Y occurred in the antecubital fossa, resulting in an estimated absorbed dose of 20–40 Gy (3). An area of erythema was noted as soon as the following day and subsequently progressed to an 8 × 11 cm elliptic region of grade 3 dermatitis (wet desquamation).

The 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan protocol prescribes an initial injection of 111In-labled ibritumomab tiuxetan followed by imaging at 48–72 h. Provided a favorable biodistribution is observed, the patient receives the therapeutic infusion of 90Y-labeled ibritumomab tiuxetan on day 7. 90Y is a pure β-emitter, and imaging is challenging because of the absence of prompt γ-emission. Strategies for imaging distributions of 90Y by detecting bremsstrahlung emissions have been used for various applications (4,5), but in this case, the γ-radiation from the 111In, still present in the body in appreciable amounts, complicates the problem. Bremsstrahlung photons are emitted as the β-particles decelerate in tissue and form a continuous energy spectrum from zero to a maximum of 2.3 MeV—the β-endpoint energy. The efficiency of bremsstrahlung production is low, particularly in the low-Z tissue matrix, so even at low concentrations of 111In relative to 90Y, the photopeaks from the 111In γ-emissions at 171 and 245 keV are prominent. A technique designed to detect 90Y distributions must reject those photons.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Estimation of Relative Emissions

To establish the relative concentrations of 90Y and 111In and prepare a phantom to mimic the imaging environment 7 d into the 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan protocol, we proceeded as follows. A 70-kg patient would receive a 185-MBq injection of 111In for imaging and then 7 d later undergo the 90Y infusion at a dose of 14.8 MBq/kg or 1.03 GBq. Assuming the worst case of no biologic decay of the 111In, then at the time of 90Y infusion, there remains due to physical decay 33 MBq of 111In distributed in the body.

We fortuitously had available an abdominal 111In SPECT/CT study obtained just before 90Y infusion in a 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan patient, that is, 7 d after injection of 111In-ibritumomab tiuxetan. A coronal section through the chest and abdomen is shown in Figure 1. We observed the activity to be fairly evenly distributed in the arms and throughout the tissues of the body, with the liver having a markedly more intense activity concentration approximately 7:1 relative to the background.

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Coronal section from 111In SPECT/CT study showing slice through chest and abdomen of patient 7 d after receiving 111In injection. Activity is fairly uniform throughout soft tissue but is markedly concentrated in liver.

Estimation of Absorbed Dose Due to Extravasation

On the basis of our experience with a single case of skin damage that resulted from extravasation of 90Y, we estimated the absorbed dose to the skin as follows. The subsequent skin damage at its greatest extent was observed approximately 3 wk later as an elliptic patch measuring 7 × 11 cm. The maximum range of β-particles emitted by 90Y is 11 mm in tissue, and the average range is 2.5 mm, with the deposited energy distributed along the particle's trajectory. From our observation of tissue damage and from a rough estimate of the depth of infusion plus a margin for β-particle range, we estimated the effective distribution of energy deposition to be an elliptic cylinder 7 × 11 × 1 cm thick, for a total volume of 60 cm3, or a total tissue mass of 0.06 kg assuming a tissue density of 1 g/cm3. The amount of fluid extravasated into the skin of the antecubital fossa was estimated by the staff to be between 0.5 and 1 mL of the 9-mL injection volume, which corresponds to 68–136 MBq. Based on limited data in the literature (6,7), we assumed a biologic half-life of 36 h for 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan in tissue and thus computed a mean lifetime of 33 h. Using the energy per transition of 1.49 × 10−13 Gy·kg/Bq·s (8), we computed the corresponding absorbed dose to be 20–40 Gy.

Phantom

A phantom arrangement designed to approximate the geometry of a patient undergoing imaging to detect the presence of 90Y extravasation was assembled from 3 parts: a torso phantom constructed by Data Spectrum Corp. that contains separately fillable lung and liver spaces, a cylindric tube with an inside diameter of 7.6 cm and a length of 38 cm to simulate the arm, and an elliptic 7 × 11 cm patch made from absorbent paper sealed between layers of plastic wrap.

The phantoms were filled with 111In and 90Y in amounts chosen to simulate the approximate distribution of 111In and 90Y expected on day 8 of the 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan protocol, that is, immediately after infusion of 90Y. The assumptions were that the liver concentrates activity in a ratio of 7:1 but activity elsewhere in the body is distributed uniformly; that the patient weighs 70 kg (volume of 70 L); and that only physical, not biologic, decay of the 185 MBq of 111In injected on day 1 occurs. We thus filled the torso and arm phantoms with 0.47 and 14.8 kBq/mL activity concentrations of 111In and 90Y, respectively, and we filled the liver portion of the torso phantom with 7 times those concentrations.

The patches were prepared by diluting the activity into a volume of 1 mL, which we found by experimentation to be the correct quantity of liquid to just soak the absorbent paper and therefore create an elliptic region of uniform activity. Activities soaked onto the patches were 8.3, 13.7, and 26.9 MBq.

The phantoms were placed on the imaging table to simulate the geometry of a patient lying supine with arms down. The phantom arrangement in place for imaging is shown in Figure 2.

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

Phantom arrangement consisted of torso phantom with lung and liver inserts, and adjacent cylindric arm phantom held in arm rest. The 7 × 11 cm absorbent patch is visible on superior surface of cylinder.

Planar Imaging

Images were acquired on the ADAC Forte dual-head γ-camera using medium-energy general-purpose (MEGP) and high-energy general-purpose (HEGP) collimators. The energy window for bremsstrahlung imaging was centered at 120 keV with a 50% window (90–150 keV). This setting accepts photons between the lead x-ray peak and the 171-keV photopeak from 111In. This is illustrated in Figure 3. Images acquired with MEGP collimators had a matrix size of 256 × 256 × 16 and an acquisition duration of 5 min. Images acquired with HEGP collimators had the same matrix size and an acquisition time of 10 min.

FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

Energy window settings used for imaging bremsstrahlung photons from 90Y in presence of 111In. Window samples photons between lead x-ray peak and 171-keV photopeak from 111In.

RESULTS

Images acquired with both sets of collimators and with the 8.3- and 26.9-MBq patches in place are shown in Figure 4. The most intense patch is clearly visible in the figure, and the least intense patch is just above the threshold of detection. We placed regions of interest on the images, and the results are graphed in Figures 5A and 5B. One region of interest was centered on the patch, and a background region of interest was placed on the arm phantom, just below the patch. Background counts were approximately 10 counts per pixel for the 5-min acquisition with MEGP collimators and 15 counts per pixel for the 10-min acquisition with HEGP collimators. As the patch activity increases, background counting rate goes up slightly for the images acquired with MEGP collimators and goes up only slightly or not at all for the HEGP collimators.

FIGURE 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 4.

Images acquired with MEGP and HEGP collimators from phantom arrangement affixed with 8.3- and 26.9-MBq patches.

FIGURE 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 5.

Average counts per pixel within regions of interest placed over patch and background for 3 patches containing 90Y in varying concentrations for images acquired with MEGP (A) and HEGP (B) collimators. (C) Patch contrast calculated for MEGP and HEGP collimators.

The contrast was calculated as the difference between average patch and background count densities divided by the background. This is graphed in Figure 5C, and it becomes clear that there is no contrast advantage of the HEGP collimators except perhaps for the highest-intensity patch.

DISCUSSION

Motivated by our experience of radiation-induced injury caused by extravasation of 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan, we sought to design and evaluate an imaging scheme sensitive enough to detect the bremsstrahlung radiation emitted by 90Y but insensitive to 111In γ-emission, which forms an appreciable background 7 d after injection. The approach we have taken uses a standard γ-camera with MEGP collimators and with the energy window set to detect photons in the range of 90–150 keV. This window overlaps a region of relatively high bremsstrahlung radiation while avoiding lead x-rays on one end and the 171-keV photopeak from 111In decay on the other end.

Our phantom was designed to mimic, to some degree, the conditions expected 7 d into the 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan protocol, after 90Y infusion, when a suspected extravasation would be investigated. The concentration and distribution of 111In and 90Y were estimated from limited clinical observations, as was the distribution pattern of 90Y extravasation. With this phantom arrangement, we demonstrated that we could detect extravasation in the area of the antecubital fossa down to an activity of about 8 MBq. Of course in practice, there would be a great deal of variability associated with these conditions, making a precise determination of the limits of detection difficult. In our phantom acquisitions, by arranging the torso next to the arm instead of mimicking an extended arm, and by distributing the 90Y extravasation over a relatively large area (extravasation might be expected to be initially less dispersed), we have mimicked a worst-case scenario. It may well be possible to detect activity lower than 8 MBq.

Using the same model for the geometry and clearance of extravasation as we used previously, we can calculate that an extravasation of 8 MBq of 90Y would result in an absorbed dose of 2.4 Gy to the skin and subcutaneous tissue. Thus, we surmise from these estimates that we can image 90Y, in the presence of residual 111In, with a lower limit of detection that is close to the threshold for radiation damage. For the lowest activities tested, a MEGP collimator produced at least as great a contrast relative to background in a shorter acquisition time.

CONCLUSION

We have evaluated the ability to imaging bremsstrahlung from 90Y in the presence of 111In in a phantom study designed to mimic extravasated 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan immediately after injection. With MEGP collimators and a 5-min acquisition time on a conventional γ-camera, extravasation can be detected at the approximate concentration that would be expected to cause skin damage. This technique is therefore sensitive enough to be of use in the clinic when extravasation of 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan is suspected.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Ener RA,
    2. Meglathery S,
    3. Styler M
    . Extravasation of systemic hemato-oncological therapies. Ann Oncol. 2004;15:858–862.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.↵
    1. Jordan K,
    2. Grothe W,
    3. Schmoll HJ
    . Extravasation of chemotherapeutic agents: prevention and therapy. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2005;130:33–37.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.↵
    1. Williams G,
    2. Palmer MR,
    3. Parker JA,
    4. Joyce R
    . Extravazation of therapeutic yttrium-90-ibritumomab tiuxetan (Zevalin): a case report. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2006;21:101–105.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.↵
    1. Shen S,
    2. DeNardo GL,
    3. Yuan A,
    4. DeNardo DA,
    5. DeNardo SJ
    . Planar gamma camera imaging and quantitation of yttrium-90 bremsstrahlung. J Nucl Med. 1994;35:1381–1389.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.↵
    1. Qian W,
    2. Clarke LP
    . A restoration algorithm for P-32 and Y-90 bremsstrahlung emission nuclear imaging: a wavelet-neural network approach. Med Phys. 1996;23:1309–1323.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.↵
    1. Wiseman GA,
    2. Kornmehl E,
    3. Leigh B,
    4. et al
    . Radiation dosimetry results and safety correlations from 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan radioimmunotherapy for relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: combined data from 4 clinical trials. J Nucl Med. 2003;44:465–474.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.↵
    1. Shen S,
    2. Forero A,
    3. Meredith RF,
    4. et al
    . Impact of rituximab treatment on 90Y-ibritumomab dosimetry for patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma. J Nucl Med. 2010;51:150–157.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.↵
    1. Eckerman KF,
    2. Endo A
    . MIRD: Radionuclide Data and Decay Schemes. 2nd ed. Reston, VA: Society of Nuclear Medicine; 2008.
    Google Scholar
  • Received for publication March 17, 2010.
  • Accepted for publication September 10, 2010.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology: 38 (4)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
Vol. 38, Issue 4
December 1, 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools
Share
Detection of 90Y Extravasation by Bremsstrahlung Imaging for Patients Undergoing 90Y-Ibritumomab Tiuxetan Therapy
Stephanie M. Rhymer, J. Anthony Parker, Matthew R. Palmer
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Dec 2010, 38 (4) 195-198; DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.110.077354
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Early 10-Minute Postinjection [18F]F-FAPI-42 uEXPLORER Total-Body PET/CT Scanning Protocol for Staging Lung Cancer Using HYPER Iterative Reconstruction
  • Single- Versus Dual-Time-Point Imaging for Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloid Using 99mTc-Pyrophosphate
  • Does Arthrography Improve Accuracy of SPECT/CT for Diagnosis of Aseptic Loosening in Patients with Painful Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis
Show more Imaging

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire
Alerts for this Article
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email this Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Detection of 90Y Extravasation by Bremsstrahlung Imaging for Patients Undergoing 90Y-Ibritumomab Tiuxetan Therapy
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology web site.
Citation Tools
Detection of 90Y Extravasation by Bremsstrahlung Imaging for Patients Undergoing 90Y-Ibritumomab Tiuxetan Therapy
Stephanie M. Rhymer, J. Anthony Parker, Matthew R. Palmer
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Dec 2010, 38 (4) 195-198; DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.110.077354

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience

By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies.