Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
      • JNMT Supplement
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Watch or Listen to JNMT Podcast
  • Visit SNMMI on Facebook
  • Join SNMMI on LinkedIn
  • Follow SNMMI on Twitter
  • Subscribe to JNMT RSS feeds
Research ArticleContinuing Education

Brain Death Scintigraphy: Do Not Blow the Flow

Julie D. Bolin
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology September 2024, 52 (3) 192-198; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.124.267894
Julie D. Bolin
Nuclear Medicine Technology Program, GateWay Community College, Phoenix, Arizona
CNMT, FSNMMI-TS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Findings of persistence of blood flow on blood flow study using nonlipophilic radiopharmaceutical in 22-y-old man with ruptured aneurysm of left posterior inferior cerebral artery. (A) CT scan demonstrates intraventricular and subarachnoid hemorrhage. (B) Two-second flow images (top rows) after injection of 905 MBq of 99mTc-DTPA demonstrate excellent visualization of anterior (vertical arrows) and middle (horizontal arrows) cerebral arteries, forming trident appearance indicating presence of perfusion, which progresses into visualization of intracranial venous sinuses. On immediate anterior (Ant) and right lateral (R lat) static images (bottom row), radiopharmaceutical does not cross blood–brain barrier; however, activity is noted in venous sinuses. (Reprinted from (8).)

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    Findings of persistence of blood flow on blood flow study using lipophilic radiopharmaceutical in 18-y-old man after motor vehicle accident followed by left-sided craniotomy to evacuate subdural hematoma. (A) CT indicates loss of white matter–to–gray matter differentiation in left posterior cerebral artery territory and right posterior parasagittal cortex territory. There is diffuse cerebral edema and transtentorial herniation with compression of basilar cisterns. (B) Two-second flow images (top rows) demonstrate excellent visualization of anterior (vertical arrows) and middle (horizontal arrows) cerebral arteries, resembling trident, with retention of activity within brain parenchyma, thereby indicating presence of blood flow. Anterior (Ant) and left lateral (L lat) parenchymal phase images (bottom row) demonstrate somewhat inhomogeneous though extensive brain perfusion. (Reprinted from (8).)

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    Findings of absence of blood flow on blood flow study using lipophilic radiopharmaceutical in 33-y-old man after hanging. (A) CT scan demonstrates diffuse cerebral edema with narrowing of lateral ventricles and bilateral infarction of lentiform nuclei. (B) Two-second flow images (top rows) after injection of 799 MBq of 99mTc-HMPAO demonstrate excellent visualization of common carotid arteries (arrows) but absence of flow into calvarium, consistent with brain death. Anterior (Ant) and left lateral (L lat) parenchymal phase images (bottom row) demonstrate complete lack of perfusion within boney skull (light-bulb or hollow-skull sign), including absence in posterior fossa and superior sagittal sinus. More technically demanding SPECT imaging is generally not performed in these critically ill patients. (Reprinted from (8).)

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1.

    Clinical Prerequisites and Findings (2)

    ParameterFinding
    Clinical prerequisitesClinical or neurologic evidence of acute central nervous system catastrophe compatible with diagnosis of brain death, with known or proximate cause of brain death identified
    Exclusion of confounding variables such as severe electrolyte, metabolic, endocrine, or circulatory disturbance
    No presence of drug intoxication or poisoning that could confound clinical assessment, including any sedative drugs administered by clinicians
    Core temperature maintained above 36°C (97°F), as hypothermia may suppress brain function, potentially leading to inaccurate clinical determination
    Systolic blood pressure maintained above 100 mg Hg and mean arterial pressure of at least 75 mm Hg for adults; in children, systolic blood pressure and mean arterial pressure should be at or above fifth percentile for age; administration of vasopressors may be needed to achieve this level
    Clinical findingsComa
    Absence of brain-originating motor response, including response to pain stimulus above neck or other brain-originating movements
    Absence of reflexes, including pupillary light, corneal, gag, oculocephalic (doll’s eyes), and oculovestibular reflexes (caloric responses)
    Absence of jaw jerk
    Absence of cough with tracheal suctioning
    Absence of sucking or rooting reflexes (in neonates)
    Apnea as demonstrated by apnea test
    Observation periodMinimum of 6 h; longer periods recommended in children and for certain conditions such as after cardiopulmonary resuscitation or other severe acute brain injuries
    • View popup
    TABLE 2.

    Diagnostic Imaging Used to Confirm Brain Death (1,2,7)

    TestDiagnostic criterionAdvantageDisadvantage
    Four-vessel conventional cerebral angiographyAbsence of blood flow at or beyond carotid bifurcation or circle of WillisTraditional gold standard among cerebral blood flow testsRequirement for transportation to imaging department
    Invasive
    Contrast precautions for kidneys
    Contrast stasis or delayed filling in intracranial arteries
    Radionuclide perfusion scintigraphyAbsence of blood flow at or beyond carotid bifurcation or circle of WillisSensitive for confirming brain death in presence of confounding variablesRequirement for transportation to imaging department
    Hollow skull if using brain-specific radiopharmaceuticalPotential for limitation of brain stem evaluation via planar imaging
    Requirement for coordination with multiple hospital personnel and nuclear pharmacy
    Possibility that on-call nuclear medicine staffing is not supported
    Restricted off-hours availability of radiopharmaceuticals
    Transcranial DopplerPresence of small systolic peaks without diastolic flow or reverberating flow pattern, indicating high vascular resistance and supporting diagnosis of brain deathNoninvasiveRequirement for technical experience
    Can be done at bedsideEvaluation precluded by 10%–25% prevalence of temporal bone thickening
    No contrast medium usedReports of both false-positive and false-negative results (compared with cerebral angiography or other standard)
    MRI of arterial blood flowAbsence of arterial blood flowDemonstration of variable degrees of cerebral edema and mass effectRequirement for transportation to imaging department
    Requirement for gadolinium contrast agent for improved sensitivity
    Requirement for patients to lie flat
    Possibility of short periods in which clinical monitoring is impossible
    CT angiographyAbsence of cerebral circulation perfusionWidespread availabilityUncertain clinical utility of CT angiography
    Requirement for iodine contrast injection
    • View popup
    TABLE 3.

    Radiation Dosimetry: Adults (8)

    Administered activity (intravenous)Largest radiation doseEffective dose
    RadiopharmaceuticalMBqmCiOrganmGy/MBqrad/mCimSv/MBqrem/mCi
    99mTc-DTPA555–1,11015–30Urinary bladder wall0.0650.240.00630.023
    99mTc-HMPAO370–1,11010–30Kidneys0.0340.01260.00930.034
    99mTc-ECD370–1,11010–30Urinary bladder wall0.050.180.00770.028
    • View popup
    TABLE 4.

    Radiation Dosimetry: Children (5 Years Old; Normal Renal Function) (8)

    Administered activity (intravenous)Minimum doseMaximum doseLargest radiation doseEffective dose
    RadiopharmaceuticalMBq/kgmCi/kgMBqmCiMBqmCiOrganmGy/MBqrad/mCimSv/MBqrem/mCi
    99mTc-DTPA7.40.23701074020Urinary bladder wall0.170.630.0170.063
    99mTc-HMPAO11.10.3185574020Thyroid0.140.520.0270.099
    99mTc-ECD11.10.3185574020Urinary bladder wall0.110.410.0220.081
    • View popup
    TABLE 5.

    Radiation Dosimetry in Pregnant or Potentially Pregnant Patient (8)

    Fetal dose
    Stage of gestationmGy/MBqrad/mCimGyrad
    99mTc-HMPAO
     Early0.00870.0323.2–9.70.32–0.97
     3 mo0.00670.0252.5–7.40.25–0.74
     6 mo0.00480.0181.8–5.30.18–0.53
     9 mo0.00360.0131.3–4.00.13–0.40
    99mTc-DTPA
     Early0.0120.0446.7–8.90.67–0.89
     3 mo0.00870.0324.8–6.40.48–0.64
     6 mo0.00410.0152.3–3.00.23–0.30
     9 mo0.00470.0172.6–3.50.26–0.35
    • View popup
    TABLE 6.

    Choose Wisely: Benefits and Drawbacks of Radiopharmaceuticals (3,5–8)

    Nondiffusible, non–brain-specific radiopharmaceuticalDiffusible, brain-specific radiopharmaceutical
    BenefitDrawbackBenefitDrawback
    Rapid renal excretion facilitates repeat examinations if necessaryPrimarily planar imaging is performedPlanar imaging and SPECT or SPECT/CT can be performed if patient condition allows and is neededRepeat examination on same day is often not possible because of parenchymal retention
    There is greater dependency on injection techniqueNo significant redistribution occurs for several hours, making it easy to perform and interpret imagingHigh radiochemical stability and purity are essential to prevent false-positive interpretation
    Delayed images may show superior sagittal sinus activity even in presence of brain death in as many as 50% of patients.Procedure is more technically forgiving—dynamic imaging is noncritical step in image acquisition
    Superficial scalp blood flow interferesParenchymal trapping appears preserved even in presence of metabolic disturbances
    • View popup
    TABLE 7.

    Image Acquisition Parameters (3,5)

    Dynamic flowStaticSPECT
    AnteriorAnterior for blood pool images; additional static images include posterior and lateralsOnly if using 99mTc-HMPAO or 99mTc-ECD and only as needed
    1–3 s/frame for 1–2 min500,000–1,000,000 counts per imageTime per stop and counts acquired dependent on radiopharmaceutical dose administered (e.g., 64 projections, 20–40 s/stop [200,000 counts]); use of institutional guideline for other brain SPECT studies
    15%–20% window around 140-keV photopeak15%–20% window around 140-keV photopeak15%–20% window around 140-keV photopeak
    128 × 128 matrix128 × 128 matrixAt least 128 × 128 matrix
    LEAP, LEHR collimatorsLEAP, LEHR collimatorsLEAP, LEHR, or UHR collimators; fanbeam or other focused collimator is needed for increased resolution and higher counting rates
    Zooming or magnification optionalZooming or magnification optionalZoom set to produce pixel size of 3.5 mm or less
    Circular or noncircular orbit with smallest radius possible
    Continuous or step-and-shoot
    • LEAP = low-energy all-purpose; LEHR = low-energy high-resolution; UHR = ultrahigh resolution.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology: 52 (3)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
Vol. 52, Issue 3
September 1, 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Brain Death Scintigraphy: Do Not Blow the Flow
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology web site.
Citation Tools
Brain Death Scintigraphy: Do Not Blow the Flow
Julie D. Bolin
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Sep 2024, 52 (3) 192-198; DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.124.267894

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Brain Death Scintigraphy: Do Not Blow the Flow
Julie D. Bolin
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Sep 2024, 52 (3) 192-198; DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.124.267894
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • CLINICAL PREREQUISITES
    • ANCILLARY TESTING
    • RADIONUCLIDE BRAIN PERFUSION SCINTIGRAPHY
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Its All About You!
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Illuminating the Hidden: Standardizing Cardiac MIBG Imaging for Sympathetic Dysfunction
  • PET/CT Case Series: Unmasking the Mystery of Cardiac Sarcoidosis
  • Delivery Methods of Radiopharmaceuticals: Exploring Global Strategies to Minimize Occupational Radiation Exposure
Show more Continuing Education

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • quality assurance
  • brain
  • DTPA
  • death
  • HMPAO
  • scintigraphy
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire