Article Figures & Data
Figures
- FIGURE 1.
Exposure rates (μSv/h at 1 m) from 18F-FDG patients (n = 63) at different time points.
- FIGURE 2.
Comparison of overall reduction of emitted radiation from voiding after decay correction of categorized 18F-FDG patients with corresponding P values. P values indicate no statistical significance between different patient categories regarding effect of decay-corrected void. Youth group has only 2 patients, therefore, P value of this group was not calculated.
- FIGURE 3.
Exposure rates (μSv/h at 1 m) from 18F-NaF patients (n = 20) at different time points.
- FIGURE 4.
Comparison of overall reduction of emitted radiation from voiding after decay correction of categorized 18F-NaF patients with corresponding P values. P values demonstrate that there was no statistical significance between different categories regarding effect of decay-corrected void. Youth group has only 2 patients, therefore, P value of this group was not calculated.
Tables
Tracer Study group No. of patients Age (y) BMI Dose (MBq) 18F-FDG Male 35 Range, 27–77 Range, 19.31–43.04 Range, 188–337 Mean, 54.63 ± 14.95 Mean, 28.99 ± 5.39 Mean, 284 ± 35 Female 28 Range, 21–81 Range, 17.58–39.91 Range, 185–352 Mean, 53.82 ± 15.37 Mean, 29.80 ± 4.86 Mean, 278 ± 77 All 63 Range, 21–81 Range, 17.58–43.04 Range, 185–352 Mean, 54.27 ± 15.14 Mean, 29.33 ± 5.19 Mean, 281 ± 37 18F-NaF Male 8 Range, 22–81 Range, 21.55–34.55 Range, 224–376 Mean, 63 ± 20.84 Mean, 28.34 ± 4.87 Mean, 289 ± 50 Female 12 Range, 23–78 Range, 20.09–39.84 Range, 186–369 Mean, 53.92 ± 16.11 Mean, 29.66 ± 5.39 Mean, 261 ± 51 All 20 Range, 22–81 Range, 20.09–39.84 Range, 186–376 Mean, 57.55 ± 18.69 Mean, 29.25 ± 5.26 Mean, 272 ± 53
In this issue
Jump to section
Related Articles
Cited By...
- No citing articles found.