Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
      • JNMT Supplement
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Watch or Listen to JNMT Podcast
  • Visit SNMMI on Facebook
  • Join SNMMI on LinkedIn
  • Follow SNMMI on Twitter
  • Subscribe to JNMT RSS feeds
Research ArticleImaging

Global and Regional Variations in Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloidosis: A Comparison of Longitudinal Strain and 99mTc-Pyrophosphate Imaging

Christopher Lee, Chieh-Ju Chao, Pradyumna Agasthi, Amith R. Seri, Amar Shere, Lanyu Mi, Lisa Brown, Chance Marostica, Timothy Barry, Ming Yang, Julie Rosenthal, Samuel Unzek, Farouk Mookadam and Reza Arsanjani
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology March 2022, 50 (1) 30-37; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.120.261893
Christopher Lee
1Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chieh-Ju Chao
1Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pradyumna Agasthi
1Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amith R. Seri
1Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amar Shere
1Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lanyu Mi
2Department of Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lisa Brown
1Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chance Marostica
1Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Timothy Barry
1Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ming Yang
3Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Julie Rosenthal
1Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Samuel Unzek
4Banner–University Medical Center Phoenix, Phoenix, Arizona
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Farouk Mookadam
1Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Reza Arsanjani
1Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Side-by-side comparison of American Heart Association 17-segment model bull’s-eye color-mapping plots of 99mTc-PYP scan (A) and speckle-tracking strain imaging (B) in representative case with positive 99mTc-PYP findings. Panel A demonstrates intense LV myocardium uptake in anterior and inferior segments and no uptake at apex. Panel B demonstrates characteristic apex-sparing distribution pattern of peak LV longitudinal systolic strain. In this case, segments with uptake are associated with worse strain function. Values in panel B stand for segmental peak longitudinal systolic strain of each segment. ANT = anterior; INF = inferior; LAT = lateral; POST = posterior; SEPT = septal.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    TABLE 1.

    Patient Demographics

    DemographicPYP+ (n = 22)PYP− (n = 42)Total (n = 64)P
    Age81.0 (8.4)72.0 (13.8)75.1 (12.9)0.002*
    Sex, male22 (100.0%)35 (83.3%)57 (89.1%)0.09†
    Body mass index27.0 (3.5)27.2 (5.3)27.1 (4.8)0.89*
    Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg)119.8 (16.4)136.6 (27.5)130.6 (25.3)0.029†
    Diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg)73.7 (11.93)80.5 (15.73)78.1 (14.74)0.070†
    Hypertension12 (63.2%)25 (73.5%)37 (69.8%)0.536†
    History of coronary artery disease6 (31.6%)10 (29.4%)16 (30.2%)1.000†
    History of diabetes mellitus2 (10.5%)10 (29.4%)12 (22.6%)0.174†
    β-blocker10 (52.6%)22 (64.7%)32 (60.4%)0.559†
    Calcium channel blocker1 (5.3%)9 (26.5%)10 (18.9%)0.076†
    Angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor3 (15.8%)5 (14.7%)8 (15.1%)1.000†
    Angiotensin receptor blocker5 (26.3%)5 (14.7%)10 (18.9%)0.465†
    Spironolactone4 (21.1%)5 (14.7%)9 (17.0%)0.706†
    Amiodarone0 (0.0%)1 (2.9%)1 (1.9%)1.000†
    Creatine1.3 (1.1–1.5)1.3 (1.1–1.8)1.3 (1.1–1.7)0.44‡
    N-terminal prohormone B-type natriuretic protein3,095.0 (1,640.0–7,323.0)3,097.0 (1,238.5–8,832.5)3,097.0 (1,407.0–7,447.0)0.99‡
    Low voltage on electrocardiography6 (28.6%)5 (11.9%)11 (17.5%)0.1575†
    LV septal wall thickness (mm)18.3 (2.96)14.1 (3.43)15.7 (3.83)0.0001*
    LV posterior wall thickness (mm)16.4 (2.63)13.1 (2.99)14.3 (3.28)0.0004*
    LV mass (g)352.3 (108.5)272.4 (101.5)300.7 (110.1)0.005*
    LV mass index (g/m2)175.7 (51.8)137.2 (42.5)150.4 (49.1)0.002*
    LV End-diastolic diameter (mm)44.5 (6.69)47.2 (6.95)46.2 (6.91)0.143*
    Ejection fraction (%)47.9 (15.2)51.8 (15.2)50.5 (15.2)0.34*
    Stroke volume (mL)65.6 (25.7)76.4 (25.1)72.5 (25.6)0.1146‡
    Cardiac index (L/m2/min)2.4 (0.83)2.8 (0.88)2.6 (0.88)0.075†
    Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion by M-mode (mm)12.3 (3.30)17.2 (5.36)15.8 (5.29)0.0250‡
    Pericardial effusion8 (36.4%)6 (14.3%)14 (21.9%)0.0584†
    Heart-to-contralateral ratio1.7 (0.4)1.1 (0.2)1.3 (0.4)<0.001†
    PYP scale¶0 (0.0%)30 (71.4%)30 (46.9%)<0.001†
    02 (9.1%)7 (16.7%)9 (14.1%)
    16 (27.3%)2 (4.8%)8 (12.5%)
    214 (63.6%)3 (7.1%)17 (26.6%)
    30 (0.0%)30 (71.4%)30 (46.9%)
    • * Unequal-variance 2-sample t test.

    • ↵†Fisher exact test.

    • ↵‡Wilcoxon rank-sum test.

    • ↵¶Qualitative value for interpretation is determined by comparing uptake in myocardium. Grade 0 = no myocardial uptake, grade 1 = myocardial uptake less than bone uptake, grade 2 = myocardial uptake equal to bone uptake, grade 3 = myocardial uptake greater than bone uptake.

    • Qualitative data are number and percentage; continuous data are mean and SD or median and interquartile range.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2.

    Regional Comparison in PYP+ Vs. PYP− Participants Using 17-Segment Model

    RegionPYP + (n = 22)PYP− (n = 42)Total (n = 64)P*
    Global (%)−10.5 (2.6)−13.1 (4.1)−12.2 (3.9)0.003
    Apex (%)−17.6 (4.7)−19.0 (6.5)−18.5 (5.9)0.35
    Mid (%)−9.6 (4.0)−11.7 (4.4)−11.0 (4.6)0.07
    Basal (%)−4.6 (2.6)−8.8 (4.0)−7.3 (4.1)<0.001
    • *2-sample t test.

    • View popup
    TABLE 3.

    Segment-to-Segment Comparison in PYP+ Vs. PYP− Participants Using 17-Segment Model Individually

    PYP−PYP+
    SegmentRegionnMean (%)nMean (%)P*
    BasalAnterior49−8.5 (6.82)12−5.7 (4.31)0.17
    Anteroseptal54−13.3 (7.58)8−14.3 (6.86)0.73
    Inferoseptal50−19.3 (8.09)9−20.3 (7.55)0.71
    Inferior44−8.7 (6.44)16−3.3 (6.27)0.006
    Inferolateral46−11.7 (8.40)15−10.9 (6.51)0.74
    Anterolateral51−19.7 (8.63)9−11.8 (8.57)0.01
    MidAnterior45−8.3 (6.00)18−6.3 (4.69)0.20
    Anteroseptal40−10 (5.92)21−8.4 (4.63)0.31
    Inferoseptal41−18.9 (8.91)22−18.0 (5.69)0.61
    Inferior45−9.4 (8.64)18−7.6 (6.12)0.42
    Inferolateral48−9.1 (6.12)14−7.9 (4.07)0.52
    Anterolateral49−16.4 (8.25)14−15.6 (6.44)0.76
    ApicalAnterior51−12.4 (4.80)12−10.2 (3.09)0.15
    Septal41−13.1 (4.96)22−9.9 (2.85)0.002
    Inferior42−13.1 (4.90)21−9.7 (2.80)0.001
    Lateral51−12.4 (4.76)12−10.2 (3.31)0.13
    Apex55−12.2 (4.67)8−10.5 (3.83)0.33
    • *2-sample t test.

    • Data in parentheses are SDs.

    • View popup
    TABLE 4.

    LV Diastolic Function Parameters

    ParameterPYP+ (n = 22)PYP− (n = 42)Total (n = 64)P
    Presence of diastolic dysfunction17 (77.3%)15 (36.6%)32 (50.0%)0.002*
    Peak tricuspid regurgitation velocity (m/s)2.7 (0.44)2.9 (0.46)2.8 (0.46)0.176†
    Right ventricular systolic pressure (mm Hg)40.3 (12.7)44.1 (15.1)42.8 (14.3)0.3370‡
    E-wave velocity (m/s)0.9 (0.8–1.0)0.8 (0.7–1.0)0.9 (0.7–1.0)0.70†
    A-wave velocity (m/s)0.5 (0.3–0.7)0.8 (0.6–0.9)0.7 (0.5–0.9)0.03†
    E/A ratio2.0 (1.1–3.0)1.2 (0.9–1.8)1.3 (1.0–2.0)0.06†
    E deceleration time (ms)154.5 (140.0–189.0)178.0 (139.0–205.0)170.0 (140.0–205.0)0.46†
    Tissue doppler medial e′ > velocity (cm/s)3.3 (1.9)4.7 (1.7)4.2 (1.9)0.009†
    Tissue doppler lateral e′ > velocity (cm/s)4.4 (2.0)6.3 (2.3)5.6 (2.4)0.009†
    E/e′ ratio medial32.4 (18.3)22.0 (12.1)25.8 (15.3)0.02‡
    E/e′ ratio lateral21.8 (9.2)17.0 (10.3)18.8 (10.1)0.07‡
    • * Fisher exact test.

    • ↵†Wilcoxon rank-sum test.

    • ↵‡2-sample t test.

    • Qualitative data are number and percentage; continuous data are mean and SD or median and interquartile range.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental Data

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental Data
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology: 50 (1)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
Vol. 50, Issue 1
March 1, 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Global and Regional Variations in Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloidosis: A Comparison of Longitudinal Strain and 99mTc-Pyrophosphate Imaging
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology web site.
Citation Tools
Global and Regional Variations in Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloidosis: A Comparison of Longitudinal Strain and 99mTc-Pyrophosphate Imaging
Christopher Lee, Chieh-Ju Chao, Pradyumna Agasthi, Amith R. Seri, Amar Shere, Lanyu Mi, Lisa Brown, Chance Marostica, Timothy Barry, Ming Yang, Julie Rosenthal, Samuel Unzek, Farouk Mookadam, Reza Arsanjani
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Mar 2022, 50 (1) 30-37; DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.120.261893

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Global and Regional Variations in Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloidosis: A Comparison of Longitudinal Strain and 99mTc-Pyrophosphate Imaging
Christopher Lee, Chieh-Ju Chao, Pradyumna Agasthi, Amith R. Seri, Amar Shere, Lanyu Mi, Lisa Brown, Chance Marostica, Timothy Barry, Ming Yang, Julie Rosenthal, Samuel Unzek, Farouk Mookadam, Reza Arsanjani
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Mar 2022, 50 (1) 30-37; DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.120.261893
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • 2022--A "Ditto" of 2021?
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Early 10-Minute Postinjection [18F]F-FAPI-42 uEXPLORER Total-Body PET/CT Scanning Protocol for Staging Lung Cancer Using HYPER Iterative Reconstruction
  • Single- Versus Dual-Time-Point Imaging for Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloid Using 99mTc-Pyrophosphate
  • Does Arthrography Improve Accuracy of SPECT/CT for Diagnosis of Aseptic Loosening in Patients with Painful Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis
Show more Imaging

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • cardiology
  • correlative imaging
  • 99mTc-pyrophosphate imaging
  • longitudinal strain
  • transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire