Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
      • JNMT Supplement
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Watch or Listen to JNMT Podcast
  • Visit SNMMI on Facebook
  • Join SNMMI on LinkedIn
  • Follow SNMMI on Twitter
  • Subscribe to JNMT RSS feeds
Research ArticleSpecial Contribution

Assessment of Myocardial Viability Using Nuclear Medicine Imaging in Dextrocardia

Shwetal U. Pawar, Suruchi S. Shetye, Mangala K. Ghorpade and Rahul Azeez Seena
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology December 2020, 48 (4) 372-377; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.120.248435
Shwetal U. Pawar
Department of Nuclear Medicine, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Seth G.S. Medical College, Mumbai, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Suruchi S. Shetye
Department of Nuclear Medicine, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Seth G.S. Medical College, Mumbai, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mangala K. Ghorpade
Department of Nuclear Medicine, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Seth G.S. Medical College, Mumbai, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rahul Azeez Seena
Department of Nuclear Medicine, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Seth G.S. Medical College, Mumbai, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    A 66-y-old man who had dextrocardia with situs inversus presented with non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. (A) Poor R-wave progression was seen on V3–V6 chest leads on electrocardiography, which was obtained with chest leads arranged on right chest wall. (B) Maximum-intensity-projection rest perfusion SPECT image showed heart in right chest (arrow) and liver on left side. (C and D) Processing of raw data in feet-first supine position showed interchanged lateral wall and septum in reconstructed horizontal long-axis image (arrowheads). (E and F) Orientation of septum and lateral wall was corrected in repeat processing, which was done after entering dataset for feet-first prone position instead of feet-first supine to match conventional nomenclature of display image (arrowheads). Perfusion was absent from mid-anteroseptal, basal anteroseptal, mid-inferoseptal, and basal inferoseptal segments whereas 18F-FDG uptake was present in same segments, thus suggesting viable myocardium (matched perfusion and metabolism).

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    A 61-y-old woman had dextrocardia with situs inversus. (A) On maximum-intensity projection, heart was seen in right chest and liver on left side (arrow). (B and C) Processing of raw data in feet-first supine position showed interchanged lateral wall and septum in reconstructed 3-axes display image (C) and horizontal long-axis image (B). (D and E) Orientation of septum and lateral wall was corrected in repeat processing (D), which was done after entering dataset for feet-first prone position instead of feet-first supine to match conventional nomenclature of display image (E). Perfusion was absent from apex, apical septum, mid- and basal anterior walls, and mid- and basal anteroseptal segments whereas 18F-FDG uptake was present in same segments, suggesting viable myocardium (matched perfusion and metabolism).

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    A 42-y-old man with mesocardia presented with breathlessness. Electrocardiography (A) showed ST-segment elevation in V4 and V5, Q waves in V1 and V4–V6, and right bundle branch block. (B) Maximum-intensity projections showed heart in midline of chest and gallbladder and liver on right side. (C–E) Processing of raw data in feet-first supine position showed lateral wall and septum positioned normally on reconstructed horizontal long-axis image (C) and short-axis image (D) and on display images (E). Rest perfusion slices showed absence of perfusion in apex, apical anterior, apical septal, apical inferior, apical lateral, basal anteroseptal, and mid-inferior segments. Perfusion was reduced in entire anterior wall and septum. 18F-FDG PET images did not show uptake in corresponding myocardial segments, suggesting absence of viable myocardium in infarcted segments (matched perfusion and metabolism).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Patient Details Regarding Dextrocardia, Acquisition, and Processing

    VariablePatient 1Patient 2Patient 3
    Age (y)666142
    SexMFM
    PresentationNSTEMIBreathlessnessChest pain
    Type of dextrocardiaCompleteCompleteIncomplete (mesocardia)
    Situs inversus?YesYesNo
    Patient positioning
     SPECTFeet-first supineFeet-first supineFeet-first supine
     18F-FDG PETHead-first supineHead-first supineHead-first supine
    Imaging arc during acquisition
     SPECT45° LAO to 135° RPO clockwise45° LAO to 135° RPO clockwise180° right lateral to left lateral
     18F-FDG PET360°360°360°
    Routine processing*
     SPECTFeet-first supineFeet-first supineFeet-first supine
     18F-FDG PETHead-first supineHead-first supineHead-first supine
     Cardiac wall orientationInterchanged septum and lateral wallInterchanged septum and lateral wallNot affected
    Change in processingRequiredRequiredNot required
     SPECTFeet-first proneFeet-first prone—
     18F-FDG PETHead-first proneHead-first prone—
     Cardiac wall orientationCorrectedCorrected—
    • ↵* Using Emory Cardiac Toolbox.

    • NSTEMI = non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology: 48 (4)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
Vol. 48, Issue 4
December 1, 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Assessment of Myocardial Viability Using Nuclear Medicine Imaging in Dextrocardia
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology web site.
Citation Tools
Assessment of Myocardial Viability Using Nuclear Medicine Imaging in Dextrocardia
Shwetal U. Pawar, Suruchi S. Shetye, Mangala K. Ghorpade, Rahul Azeez Seena
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Dec 2020, 48 (4) 372-377; DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.120.248435

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Assessment of Myocardial Viability Using Nuclear Medicine Imaging in Dextrocardia
Shwetal U. Pawar, Suruchi S. Shetye, Mangala K. Ghorpade, Rahul Azeez Seena
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Dec 2020, 48 (4) 372-377; DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.120.248435
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • CASE REPORTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • 2020 - A Year Like No Other
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Gender and Ethnicity Bias of Text-to-Image Generative Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging, Part 1: Preliminary Evaluation
  • Gender and Ethnicity Bias of Text-to-Image Generative Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging, Part 2: Analysis of DALL-E 3
  • The Impact of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic on the Clinical Environment
Show more Special Contribution

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • human dextrocardia
  • myocardial viability
  • rest perfusion
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire