Research ArticleEducators' Forum

Supporting the Quality of Measurement and Evaluation in Education

Donna L. Mason, William A. Wentling, Nadine Cozzo Englert, Lynn George, Holly M. Hampe, Susan Hellier, Judith A. Kaufmann, Lisa W. Locasto and Donna S. McDermott
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology December 2018, 46 (4) 384-390; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.118.210385

Article Figures & Data

Tables

  • TABLE 1

    Survey Outcome Questions and Undergraduate Student Responses

    QuestionMeasureStudent responses (n)Descriptive statistics
    Exam protocol contributed to creation of optimal testing environment5-point Likert scale*58Mean, 2.86; CI, 2.605–3.119; SD, 0.999
    SNHS exam protocol helped to decrease my anxiety when testing because I knew what to expect5-point Likert scale56Mean, 3.589; CI, 3.341–3.838; SD, 0.949
    What effect does exam protocol have on intent to cheat?4-point Likert scale†58Mean, 2.086; CI, 1.869–2.303; SD, 0.844

    • ↵* 1 = strongly agree; 5 = strongly disagree.

    • ↵† 1 = a significant decrease; 2 = a decrease; 3 = no effect; 4 = an increase.

    • CI = confidence interval.

Back to top

In this issue

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

Keywords