Skip to main content
  • Main menu
  • User menu
  • Search
  • English ▼
    • English
    • Afrikaans
    • Albanian
    • Amharic
    • Arabic
    • Armenian
    • Azerbaijani
    • Basque
    • Belarusian
    • Bengali
    • Bosnian
    • Bulgarian
    • Catalan
    • Cebuano
    • Chichewa
    • Chinese (Simplified)
    • Chinese (Traditional)
    • Corsican
    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Danish
    • Dutch
    • Esperanto
    • Estonian
    • Filipino
    • Finnish
    • French
    • Frisian
    • Galician
    • Georgian
    • German
    • Greek
    • Gujarati
    • Haitian Creole
    • Hausa
    • Hawaiian
    • Hebrew
    • Hindi
    • Hmong
    • Hungarian
    • Icelandic
    • Igbo
    • Indonesian
    • Irish
    • Italian
    • Japanese
    • Javanese
    • Kannada
    • Kazakh
    • Khmer
    • Korean
    • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
    • Kyrgyz
    • Lao
    • Latin
    • Latvian
    • Lithuanian
    • Luxembourgish
    • Macedonian
    • Malagasy
    • Malay
    • Malayalam
    • Maltese
    • Maori
    • Marathi
    • Mongolian
    • Myanmar (Burmese)
    • Nepali
    • Norwegian
    • Pashto
    • Persian
    • Polish
    • Portuguese
    • Punjabi
    • Romanian
    • Russian
    • Samoan
    • Scottish Gaelic
    • Serbian
    • Sesotho
    • Shona
    • Sindhi
    • Sinhala
    • Slovak
    • Slovenian
    • Somali
    • Spanish
    • Sudanese
    • Swahili
    • Swedish
    • Tajik
    • Tamil
    • Telugu
    • Thai
    • Turkish
    • Ukrainian
    • Urdu
    • Uzbek
    • Vietnamese
    • Welsh
    • Xhosa
    • Yiddish
    • Yoruba
    • Zulu

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
      • JNMT Supplement
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

Advanced Search

English ▼
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scottish Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sudanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu
  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Watch or Listen to JNMT Podcast
  • Visit SNMMI on Facebook
  • Join SNMMI on LinkedIn
  • Follow SNMMI on Twitter
  • Subscribe to JNMT RSS feeds
Review ArticleContinuing Education

Best Practices in Molecular Breast Imaging: A Guide for Technologists

Tiffinee N. Swanson, Thuy D. Tran, Lacey R. Ellingson, Michael K. O’Connor, Deborah J. Rhodes, Katie N. Hunt, Amy Lynn Conners and Carrie B. Hruska
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology March 2018, 46 (1) 3-11; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.117.204263
Tiffinee N. Swanson
1Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; and
CNMT
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thuy D. Tran
1Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; and
CNMT
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lacey R. Ellingson
1Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; and
CNMT
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael K. O’Connor
1Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Deborah J. Rhodes
2Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Katie N. Hunt
1Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amy Lynn Conners
1Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carrie B. Hruska
1Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    (A) Intravenous injection of 99mTc-sestamibi via butterfly needle. (B) Radiotracer in low-adhesion syringe (encased in syringe shield) connected to 10-mL saline flush for injection.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    Proper breast positioning for craniocaudal view. (A) Patient is seated in chair with shoulder relaxed and arms resting in lap. While breast is guided to camera, IMF is lifted until nipple extends perpendicular to chest wall. (B) With nipple extending perpendicular to chest wall, 2 hands are used to lift breast onto detector. (C) Lateral aspect of breast is pulled and anchored into FOV while compression is slowly applied. (D) Compression is applied in this craniocaudal view. (E) Patient’s back is supported with pillows to increase comfort and prevent motion.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    Improper breast positioning for craniocaudal view. (A) Lateral and posterior breast tissue is not fully included in FOV. (B) Camera is lower than IMF, creating fold underneath breast and causing nipple to point inferiorly. (C) Motion during craniocaudal (CC) acquisition creates appearance of blurred edge to breast tissue on resultant image.

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    Proper breast positioning for MLO view. (A) Detector angle matches angle of pectoral muscle. (B) Patient’s arm is on top of detector, with no gap (arrow) between detector and chest. (C) IMF (arrow) is opened by lifting breast up and away from chest wall. (D) In a medial view of the MLO with compression applied, there is no gap between upper detector and chest wall, and corner of detector rests below clavicle.

  • FIGURE 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 5.

    Improper breast positioning for MLO view. (A) Gap (arrow) between detector and chest indicates improper positioning. (B) MLO view of breast with nipple not positioned in profile (black arrow) creates appearance of pseudo lesion (white arrow) on resultant image. Radioactive “R” marker indicates laterality. (C) In patient with larger body habitus in whom IMF is not open, abdominal tissue is included in FOV (arrow). (D) Motion on MLO view creates appearance of 2 outlines of breast.

  • FIGURE 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 6.

    Proper breast positioning on mammography (left) and MBI (right). (A) Presence of cleavage and all lateral breast tissue while nipple is kept in profile indicates properly positioned breast for craniocaudal view. (B) Presence of pectoral muscle, nipple in profile, and open IMF indicate properly positioned breast for MLO view.

  • FIGURE 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 7.

    Common imaging variants. (A) Tiled MLO views were performed on patient whose breast size exceeded MBI FOV, with additional craniocaudal (CC) view being acquired to assess area of uptake (arrow). (B) Breast implants appear photopenic on MBI views.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Guidelines for Waiting Periods Between Imaging Procedures Performed Before MBI Examination

    ModalityProcedureAdministered doseRecommended waiting period
    CTWith or without contrastNone
    MRIWith or without contrastNone
    PET18F-FDG555 MBq (15 mCi)>12 h
    11C-choline370–740 MBq (10–20 mCi)>2 h
    13N-ammonia370–740 MBq (10–20 mCi)>1 h
    Nuclear medicine99mTc-sestamibi for parathyroid or cardiac studies370–1,110 MBq (10–30 mCi)None*
    99mTc-radiopharmaceuticals, intravenous>740 MBq (20 mCi)>24 h
    >370 MBq (10 mCi)>18 h
    >185 MBq (5 mCi)>12 h
    <185 MBq (5 mCi)>6 h
    99mTc-radiopharmaceuticals, oral<185 MBq (5 mCi)None
    123I-based radiopharmaceuticals>370 MBq (10 mCi)>2 d
    111In- and 67Ga-based radiopharmaceuticals185–370 MBq (5–10 mCi)>3 d
    <37 MBq (1 mCi)>24 h
    • These are general guidelines and in some cases may overestimate waiting period needed, depending on biologic distribution of radiopharmaceutical.

    • ↵* In cases of prior administration of 99mTc-sestamibi for cardiac or parathyroid studies, reduced (or no dose) of 99mTc-sestamibi may be used, depending on residual activity from prior study.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Guidelines for Waiting Periods Between MBI Examination and Other Imaging Procedures

    ModalityProcedureAdministered doseRecommended waiting period
    CTWith or without contrastNone
    MRIWith or without contrastNone
    PETAll radiopharmaceuticalsNone
    Nuclear medicine99mTc-sestamibi for parathyroid (or cardiac rest only) studies370–1,110 MBq (10–30 mCi)None*
    99mTc-radiopharmaceuticals, intravenous or oral>740 MBq (20 mCi)>12 h
    >370 MBq (10 mCi)>24 h
    >185 MBq (5 mCi)>24 h
    <185 MBq (5 mCi)>36 h
    99mTc-sulfur colloid (sentinel node)<19 MBq (500 μCi)>24 h
    123I-based radiopharmaceuticals>370 MBq (10 mCi)None
    <37 MBq (1 mCi)>24 h
    111In- and 67Ga-based radiopharmaceuticalsNone
    • These are general guidelines and in some cases may overestimate waiting period needed, depending on biologic distribution of radiopharmaceutical.

    • ↵* May consider combining dose administration. In cases of prior administration of 99mTc-sestamibi for cardiac or parathyroid studies, reduced (or no dose) of 99mTc-sestamibi may be used, depending on residual activity from prior study.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology: 46 (1)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
Vol. 46, Issue 1
March 1, 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools
Share
Best Practices in Molecular Breast Imaging: A Guide for Technologists
Tiffinee N. Swanson, Thuy D. Tran, Lacey R. Ellingson, Michael K. O’Connor, Deborah J. Rhodes, Katie N. Hunt, Amy Lynn Conners, Carrie B. Hruska
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Mar 2018, 46 (1) 3-11; DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.117.204263
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • QUALITY CONTROL
    • EXAMINATION PREPARATION
    • PATIENT PREPARATION
    • RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL INJECTION
    • CONTRAINDICATIONS RELATIVE TO OTHER IMAGING PROCEDURES
    • IMAGING
    • COMMON VARIANTS
    • EXAMINATION INTERPRETATION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • A Survey of Patient Experience During Molecular Breast Imaging
  • SNMMI Procedure Standard/EANM Practice Guideline for Molecular Breast Imaging with Dedicated {gamma}-Cameras
  • Advances and Future Directions in Molecular Breast Imaging
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Illuminating the Hidden: Standardizing Cardiac MIBG Imaging for Sympathetic Dysfunction
  • PET/CT Case Series: Unmasking the Mystery of Cardiac Sarcoidosis
  • Delivery Methods of Radiopharmaceuticals: Exploring Global Strategies to Minimize Occupational Radiation Exposure
Show more Continuing Education

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • molecular breast imaging
  • technologist guidebook
  • protocol
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire
Alerts for this Article
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email this Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Best Practices in Molecular Breast Imaging: A Guide for Technologists
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology web site.
Citation Tools
Best Practices in Molecular Breast Imaging: A Guide for Technologists
Tiffinee N. Swanson, Thuy D. Tran, Lacey R. Ellingson, Michael K. O’Connor, Deborah J. Rhodes, Katie N. Hunt, Amy Lynn Conners, Carrie B. Hruska
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Mar 2018, 46 (1) 3-11; DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.117.204263

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience

By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies.