Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
      • JNMT Supplement
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Watch or Listen to JNMT Podcast
  • Visit SNMMI on Facebook
  • Join SNMMI on LinkedIn
  • Follow SNMMI on Twitter
  • Subscribe to JNMT RSS feeds
Research ArticleImaging

Variability in Heart-to-Mediastinum Ratio from Planar 123I-MIBG Images of a Thorax Phantom for 6 Common γ-Camera Models

Rikard Owenius, Michelle Zanette and Patrick Cella
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology December 2017, 45 (4) 297-303; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.117.196055
Rikard Owenius
1Department of Surgical Sciences, Radiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michelle Zanette
2GE Healthcare, Life Sciences, Imaging R&D, Marlborough, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Patrick Cella
2GE Healthcare, Life Sciences, Imaging R&D, Marlborough, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Single-chamber 123I-MIBG thorax phantom. Photograph of unfilled phantom (A) and example planar acquisition after filling with 123I (B). Polygonal heart and square mediastinum ROIs of standardized image analysis are shown.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    Box-and-whisker plot of head 1 H/M ratio. Bottom and top of box are first and third quartiles, respectively. Horizontal line in box is median. + in box represents mean. Ends of the whiskers are minimum and maximum. Cam1 = GE Healthcare Millennium MG/LEHR (n = 10); Cam2 = GE Healthcare Discovery/LEHR (n = 8); Cam3 = GE Healthcare Infinia/LEHR (n = 10); Cam4 = Philips Brightview/LEHR (n = 2); Cam5 = Philips Cardio 60/LEHR (n = 2); Cam6 = Philips Cardio MD/LEHR (n = 4); Cam7 = Philips Vertex/VXGP (vertex general purpose) or VXHR (vertex high resolution) (n = 8); Cam8 = Siemens e.cam/LEHR (n = 8); Cam9 = Siemens Symbia/LEHR (n = 8). VXGP = vertex general purpose; VXHR = vertex high resolution.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    Bland–Altman plot for reader 1. Mean H/M (i.e., values for both heads) for each camera is plotted against difference between head 1 H/M and head 2 H/M. Results from reader 2 were similar to those shown here. VXGP = vertex general purpose; VXHR = vertex high resolution.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    LEHR Collimator Specifications for Studying γ-Cameras

    ManufacturerModelLEHR collimator typeMean septal thickness (mm)
    GE HealthcareMillennium MGCast0.20
    GE HealthcareInfinia and Discovery NM seriesFoil0.20
    Siemense.cam and SymbiaFoil0.16
    ADAC/PhilipsVertexFoil0.152 (26)
    PhilipsBrightviewFoil0.156 (27)
    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Summary of Camera Models, Collimator Types, and Sample Size Per Model Included in Study

    Camera modelCollimator typeSample size
    GE Healthcare, Millennium MGLEHR10
    GE Healthcare, DiscoveryLEHR8
    GE Healthcare, InfiniaLEHR10
    Philips, VertexVXGP/VXHR8
    Siemens, e.camLEHR8
    Siemens, SymbiaLEHR8
    Philips, BrightviewLEHR2
    Philips, Cardio 60LEHR2
    Philips, Cardio MDLEHR4
    • VXGP = vertex general purpose; VXHR = vertex high resolution.

    • View popup
    TABLE 3

    Analysis of Intracamera Variability in H/M Ratio

    MeasurementGE Healthcare, Millennium MG/LEHR (n = 10)GE Healthcare, Discovery/LEHR (n = 8)GE Healthcare, Infinia/LEHR (n = 10)Philips, Brightview/LEHR (n = 2)Philips, Cardio 60/LEHR (n = 2)Philips, Cardio MD/LEHR (n = 4)Philips, Vertex/VXGP or VXHR (n = 8)Siemens, e.cam/LEHR (n = 8)Siemens, Symbia/LEHR (n = 8)
    Mean ± SD1.648 ± 0.07761.624 ± 0.08491.607 ± 0.11931.665 (0.0257)1.677 ± 0.03021.342 ± 0.02621.611 ± 0.08661.566 ± 0.11181.635 ± 0.0455
    Median1.65 (range, 1.52–1.76)1.62 (range, 1.51–1.75)1.59 (range, 1.39–1.78)1.66 (range, 1.65–1.68)1.68 (range, 1.66–1.70)1.34 (range, 1.31–1.37)1.63 (range, 1.49–1.77)1.53 (range, 1.41–1.73)1.63 (range, 1.55–1.69)
    95% CI1.592–1.7031.553–1.6951.521–1.6921.434–1.8951.406–1.9491.300–1.3841.539–1.6831.472–1.6591.597–1.673
    • Analysis is based on average of H/M ratios from 2 independent readers on camera head 1 for each camera model.

    • n = sample size for each camera/collimator combination; VXGP = vertex general purpose; VXHR = vertex high resolution.

    • View popup
    TABLE 4

    Analysis of Intercamera Variability of H/M Ratio for Thorax Phantom

    Camera/collimatorSample sizeH/M LSM ± SE*LSM difference ± SE*P*
    GE Healthcare, Millennium MG/LEHR101.645 ± 0.0286
    GE Healthcare, Discovery/LEHR81.621 ± 0.03190.024 ± 0.04290.5804
    GE Healthcare, Infinia/LEHR101.609 ± 0.02860.036 ± 0.04040.3824
    Philips, Vertex/VXGP or VXHR81.604 ± 0.03190.040 ± 0.04290.3496
    Siemens, e.cam/LEHR81.564 ± 0.03190.081 ± 0.04290.0655
    Siemens, Symbia/LEHR81.631 ± 0.03190.014 ± 0.04290.7496
    • ↵* Obtained from mixed model with repeated measures on H/M ratios for first head tested as dependent variable and camera/collimator combination as independent variable. Each camera model is compared with reference camera Millennium MG (GE Healthcare).

    • LSM = least-squares mean; VXGP = vertex general purpose; VXHR = vertex high resolution.

    • Only camera/collimator categories with a sample size of at least 8 are included in model, as specified in statistical analysis plan.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology: 45 (4)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
Vol. 45, Issue 4
December 1, 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Variability in Heart-to-Mediastinum Ratio from Planar 123I-MIBG Images of a Thorax Phantom for 6 Common γ-Camera Models
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology web site.
Citation Tools
Variability in Heart-to-Mediastinum Ratio from Planar 123I-MIBG Images of a Thorax Phantom for 6 Common γ-Camera Models
Rikard Owenius, Michelle Zanette, Patrick Cella
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Dec 2017, 45 (4) 297-303; DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.117.196055

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Variability in Heart-to-Mediastinum Ratio from Planar 123I-MIBG Images of a Thorax Phantom for 6 Common γ-Camera Models
Rikard Owenius, Michelle Zanette, Patrick Cella
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Dec 2017, 45 (4) 297-303; DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.117.196055
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Early 10-Minute Postinjection [18F]F-FAPI-42 uEXPLORER Total-Body PET/CT Scanning Protocol for Staging Lung Cancer Using HYPER Iterative Reconstruction
  • Single- Versus Dual-Time-Point Imaging for Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloid Using 99mTc-Pyrophosphate
  • Effectiveness of Data-Driven Gating FDG PET/CT for Abdominal Region
Show more Imaging

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Iobenguane
  • MIBG
  • phantom
  • heart-to-mediastinum ratio
  • heart failure
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire