Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
      • JNMT Supplement
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Watch or Listen to JNMT Podcast
  • Visit SNMMI on Facebook
  • Join SNMMI on LinkedIn
  • Follow SNMMI on Twitter
  • Subscribe to JNMT RSS feeds
Research ArticleImaging

Comparison of 3 Devices for Automated Infusion of Positron-Emitting Radiotracers

Noriaki Miyaji, Kenta Miwa, Kei Wagatsuma, Taisuke Murata, Takuro Umeda, Takashi Terauchi and Mitsuru Koizumi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology June 2017, 45 (2) 91-95; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.116.188243
Noriaki Miyaji
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kenta Miwa
2Department of Radiological Sciences, School of Health Sciences, International University of Health and Welfare, Tochigi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kei Wagatsuma
3Research Team for Neuroimaging, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Taisuke Murata
4Department of Radiology, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Takuro Umeda
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Takashi Terauchi
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mitsuru Koizumi
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Manufactured automated infusion devices evaluated in this study: M-130 (A), AI-300 (B), and UG-05 (C).

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    Scheme of measurement and administration process of each device: M-130 (A), AI-300 (B), and UG-05 (C).

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    Variations in radioactive concentrations (A) and dispensed volumes (B). ○ = AI-300; ● = M-130; × = UG-05.

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    Administration accuracy of AI-300 before and after software update. ○ = original; ● = update.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Main Technical Features of Automated Infusion Devices

    Automated infusion device
    FeatureM-130AI-300UG-05
    Maximum radioactivity of multidose vial (MBq)18,50037,00037,000
    Maximum radioactive concentration of multidose vial (MBq/mL)1,5001,5001,200
    Range of net administration (MBq)100–74050–740−740
    Measurement accuracy of radioactive concentration (%)±10±5±5
    Measurement accuracy of radioactivity (%)±10±5±5
    Administration accuracy (%)±10±5±5
    Variation of volumeConstancyVariabilityConstancy
    Measurement sampleTubeSyringeVial
    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Comparison of Accuracy of Administered 18F-FDG Radioactivity Between Automated Infusion Device and External Dose Calibrator

    DevicesSampleRadioactive concentration (MBq/mL)Dispensed volume of 18F-FDG (mL)Radioactivity recorded by device (MBq)External measurement (MBq)Administration accuracy (%)Radioactive concentration (MBq/mL)Dispensed volume of 18F-FDG (mL)Radioactivity recorded by devise (MBq)External measurement (MBq)Administration accuracy (%)
    M-1301294.120.1748.4250.33−3.79225.940.84189.79192.89−1.60
    2121.950.4148.4049.76−2.72127.321.40178.25179.58−0.74
    3200.000.2549.2650.05−1.59202.310.87176.01178.43−1.36
    4147.060.3448.5249.84−2.66152.301.17178.20180.36−1.20
    5166.670.3048.1949.97−3.56167.531.04174.23172.640.92
    6142.860.3524.0724.42−1.4259.611.5491.8094.27−2.63
    AI-3001104.170.4848.8747.872.09118.801.42168.70169.63−0.55
    2131.580.3850.0949.341.52165.571.12185.44170.628.68
    3147.060.3450.6144.5413.64178.591.04185.73175.665.73
    4131.580.3852.0146.8810.94161.711.14184.35173.836.05
    5151.520.3349.0142.8314.42177.281.05186.14171.398.61
    6161.290.3148.9347.981.99183.621.01185.46182.751.48
    UG-05190.790.6054.4851.276.2692.042.01180.23174.923.04
    2154.730.3452.6150.164.87181.371.02147.90141.924.21
    3205.090.2653.3252.142.27205.560.90185.01175.615.35
    4206.850.2653.7850.566.37179.611.03179.35177.291.16
    5224.450.2556.1152.985.92212.640.87182.29173.105.31
    6108.580.3942.3442.40−0.13411.110.45191.05187.631.83
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology: 45 (2)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
Vol. 45, Issue 2
June 1, 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of 3 Devices for Automated Infusion of Positron-Emitting Radiotracers
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology web site.
Citation Tools
Comparison of 3 Devices for Automated Infusion of Positron-Emitting Radiotracers
Noriaki Miyaji, Kenta Miwa, Kei Wagatsuma, Taisuke Murata, Takuro Umeda, Takashi Terauchi, Mitsuru Koizumi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Jun 2017, 45 (2) 91-95; DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.116.188243

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Comparison of 3 Devices for Automated Infusion of Positron-Emitting Radiotracers
Noriaki Miyaji, Kenta Miwa, Kei Wagatsuma, Taisuke Murata, Takuro Umeda, Takashi Terauchi, Mitsuru Koizumi
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Jun 2017, 45 (2) 91-95; DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.116.188243
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Delivery Methods of Radiopharmaceuticals: Exploring Global Strategies to Minimize Occupational Radiation Exposure
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Early 10-Minute Postinjection [18F]F-FAPI-42 uEXPLORER Total-Body PET/CT Scanning Protocol for Staging Lung Cancer Using HYPER Iterative Reconstruction
  • Single- Versus Dual-Time-Point Imaging for Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloid Using 99mTc-Pyrophosphate
  • Does Arthrography Improve Accuracy of SPECT/CT for Diagnosis of Aseptic Loosening in Patients with Painful Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis
Show more Imaging

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • positron emission tomography (PET)
  • administration accuracy
  • automated infusion device
  • quantitative PET
  • dose calibrator
  • radiation exposure
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire