Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
      • JNMT Supplement
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Continuing Education
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Contact
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Permissions
    • Continuing Education
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Contact
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Follow SNMMI on Twitter
  • Visit SNMMI on Facebook
  • Join SNMMI on LinkedIn
  • Subscribe to JNMT RSS feeds
Review ArticleTeaching Case Studies

A Bizarre Ring Artifact on SPECT/CT Images

Sajid Bashir, Muhammad Shahbaz and Dilber Iqbal
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology June 2017, 45 (2) 119-120; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.116.189365
Sajid Bashir
Department of Medical Physics, Punjab Institute of Nuclear Medicine, Faisalabad, Pakistan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Muhammad Shahbaz
Department of Medical Physics, Punjab Institute of Nuclear Medicine, Faisalabad, Pakistan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dilber Iqbal
Department of Medical Physics, Punjab Institute of Nuclear Medicine, Faisalabad, Pakistan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

We encountered a round artifact on images obtained with our SPECT/CT system: a small dark spot surrounded by a broad light ring. The artifact was due to a problem with the SPECT portion of the hybrid system and was successfully removed through servicing of the system. This case report describes this scanner-based artifact, which, to our knowledge, has not previously been reported in the literature.

  • artifact
  • ring
  • optical coupling
  • SPECT/CT

SPECT/CT, a hybrid of two medical imaging systems, provides both anatomic and functional information about the body. Continuous optimum performance of a SPECT/CT system requires not only a thorough understanding of the underlying principles of its operation but also periodic quality control checks according to accepted standards (1). However, artifacts can appear at random, curtailing the degree of accuracy and putting the diagnosis under suspicion. Although SPECT and CT artifacts occur independently of each other, artifacts on the SPECT images adversely affect the CT images and vice versa (2).

CASE REPORT

We observed an artifact on images obtained with our Infinia Hawkeye SPECT/CT system (GE Healthcare). The artifact, which was seen on the SPECT portion of the images, consisted of dark and light concentric rings: a broad light ring surrounding a small dark spot. The artifact did not appear on standard clinical images or on images obtained with low-energy radioactive sources. It was first noticed when a patient was scanned using a high-energy source (131I) for whole-body imaging (Fig. 1A), and it was later confirmed in intrinsic flood images obtained with a high-energy 400-μCi (14.8-MBq) 131I point source at a distance of 5 UFOVs (useful fields of view), collecting 4,000 kilocounts (Fig. 1B). Over time, the artifact started appearing with low-energy sources as well. The camera was decommissioned until the problem could be resolved. The institutional review board of the hospital approved inclusion of the patient image in the study. All identifying information was removed from the image to maintain patient privacy.

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

(A) Clinical 131I SPECT scan on which artifact was first encountered (high-count dark spot surrounded by broad light ring). (B) Scan with high-energy 131I source confirming existence of artifact. (C) From the morning of the patient scan, daily uniformity scan with low-energy 57Co source showing no artifact. (D) Scan with low-energy 99mTc source showing no artifact. (E) A few days later, scan with low-energy 99mTc source showing artifact at same position as in high-energy-source scan. (F) After application of optical coupling grease, scan with high-energy 131I source showing no artifact.

The quality control protocol of our hospital follows any instructions given by the manufacturers of our equipment. Thus, the quality of the Infinia Hawkeye system is evaluated daily, weekly, and quarterly (3). According to the manufacturer, the daily test should be a flood uniformity scan obtained with either a 14.8-MBq 99mTc point source or a 10-mCi (370-MBq) 57Co flood source. We use a 370-MBq 57Co flood source, collecting 4,000 kilocounts, before approving the system for any patient examinations each day. This test checks for any abnormality in the images and verifies the stability of the system. The daily uniformity image shown in Figure 1C was acquired the morning of the day on which our patient was scanned.

After the artifact started showing up with the high-energy source, we began a thorough investigation. First, peaking (10%) and tuning were done using a 99mTc point source to make sure that the window setting and photomultiplier tube voltage gain were within acceptable limits. An intrinsic flood image was acquired by altering the isotope—using a 14.8-MBq 99mTc point source placed at 5 UFOVs, collecting 3 million counts. The image was of uniform intensity and showed no artifact (Fig. 1D). However, after a few days, images obtained with the same low-energy source showed a light ring in the same location as on images obtained with the high-energy source (Fig. 1E). When a corrected matrix was applied, the images had one large, ring-type artifact, but images on an uncorrected matrix had a couple of additional spots that were similar to the ring-type artifact but smaller and of lesser magnitude. At that time, the artifact started appearing on images obtained with both low-energy and high-energy sources. We opened the detector head and found that the optical coupling grease between the crystal and the photomultiplier tube had melted and dispersed outward. Fresh optical coupling grease was applied, and subsequent images showed no artifacts (Fig. 1F).

DISCUSSION

Imaging artifacts can be classified as scanner-specific, patient-based, or physics-based (4). Photomultiplier tubes are the most sensitive part of a scintillation camera and can produce severe artifacts if not properly calibrated. Performance may deteriorate if the operator incorrectly or suboptimally handles the system (5). Ring artifacts may appear for several reasons. Faulty photomultiplier tubes or low or high voltage gain may result in cold or hot rings or an inner and outer halo of lower and higher counts. Maladjustment of the preamplifier and amplifier or a defect in the circuit of the photomultiplier tube can cause ring-type artifacts. In our case, it seemed as if the counts collected by the photomultiplier tube had shrunk to a smaller region, leaving the outer region void of counts. The cause of this problem was found to be leakage of the optical coupling grease. The severity of the artifact correlated with the amount of optical coupling grease dispersed, as evidenced by the corresponding figures. Initially, images taken with a low-energy source were uniform with the exception of a large light spot at the same location as on the ensuing images acquired with high-energy sources. For the images that had shown additional smaller spots on an uncorrected matrix, the optical coupling grease had dispersed to a lesser extent. Dispersion may be due to an increase in the temperature around the photomultiplier tubes. To avoid any thermal stress on the sensitive components of the γ-camera, the temperature gradient should not exceed 5°C per hour.

CONCLUSION

A SPECT artifact consisting of dark and light concentric rings was seen on a clinical scan obtained with a high-energy radioactive source. The artifact did not appear in daily uniformity testing using low-energy sources (a 14.8-MBq 99mTc point source or a 370-MBq 57Co flood source). However, it later began appearing consistently in all images regardless of whether a low- or high-energy source was used. The cause of the artifact was found to be gradual leakage of optical coupling grease, possibly because of an increase in local temperature. Fresh optical coupling grease was applied, and the artifact did not appear on later uniformity or patient images.

DISCLOSURE

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Footnotes

  • Published online Apr. 13, 2017.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    ACR–AAPM technical standard for medical physics performance monitoring of SPECT-CT equipment. American College of Radiology website. https://www.acr.org/∼/media/ACR/Documents/PGTS/standards/MonitorSPECTEquipment.pdf. Published 2009. Revised 2014. Accessed March 30, 2017.
  2. 2.↵
    1. Jha AK,
    2. Purandare NC,
    3. Rangarajan V
    . An unusual cause of the ring artifact on transaxial CT images [abstract]. J Nucl Med Technol. 2016;44:214–215.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    Infinia Hawkeye 4 User’s Guide. Little Chalfont, U.K.: GE Healthcare; 2006.
  4. 4.↵
    1. Barrett JF,
    2. Keat N
    . Artifacts in CT: recognition and avoidance. Radiographics. 2004;24:1679–1691.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    IAEA Quality Control Atlas for Scintillation Camera Systems. Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Commission; 2003.
  • Received for publication December 30, 2016.
  • Accepted for publication March 27, 2017.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology: 45 (2)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
Vol. 45, Issue 2
June 1, 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Bizarre Ring Artifact on SPECT/CT Images
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology web site.
Citation Tools
A Bizarre Ring Artifact on SPECT/CT Images
Sajid Bashir, Muhammad Shahbaz, Dilber Iqbal
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Jun 2017, 45 (2) 119-120; DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.116.189365

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
A Bizarre Ring Artifact on SPECT/CT Images
Sajid Bashir, Muhammad Shahbaz, Dilber Iqbal
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Jun 2017, 45 (2) 119-120; DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.116.189365
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • CASE REPORT
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • The Need for Increased Awareness About Potential Quality Control Problems in Aging {gamma}-Cameras
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Confirmation of Intracranial Neuroendocrine Metastasis Using 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT
  • 99mTc Pertechnetate in Diagnosis of Meckel’s Diverticulum in an Adult Patient: Case report
  • RARE CASE OF PHYLLODES TUMOUR OF BREAST WITH CARDIAC AND PANCREATIC METASTASES. FINDINGS ON FDG PET-CT.
Show more Teaching Case Studies

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • artifact
  • ring
  • optical coupling
  • SPECT/CT
SNMMI

© 2023 Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

Powered by HighWire