Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
      • JNMT Supplement
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Watch or Listen to JNMT Podcast
  • Visit SNMMI on Facebook
  • Join SNMMI on LinkedIn
  • Follow SNMMI on Twitter
  • Subscribe to JNMT RSS feeds
Research ArticleRadiation Safety

Recommendations for Nuclear Medicine Technologists Drawn from an Analysis of Errors Reported in Australian Radiation Incident Registers

Nicole Kearney and Gary Denham
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology December 2016, 44 (4) 243-247; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.116.178517
Nicole Kearney
1Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET, Hunter New England Imaging, Newcastle, NSW, Australia; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gary Denham
2Department of Radiology, Manning Rural Referral Hospital, Taree, NSW, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Definitions of Errors

    Error typeCategorySubcategoryDefinition
    TOP noncompliancePatient interview TOPQuestions noncomplianceFailure to ask “correct patient, correct site, correct procedure” questions
    Request formErrors due to incorrect patient details on request form (e.g., wrong patient sticker)
    Pregnancy/breastfeedingErrors due to failure to check for pregnancy and breastfeeding
    Procedural TOPHandoverProcedure performed incorrectly because first person fails to properly hand over patient to second person (e.g., provides inadequate information) or second person fails to make appropriate checks
    StaffProcedure performed incorrectly because of human error (e.g., radiographer forgets to connect pressure injector to patient’s cannula)
    Internal systemsProcedure performed incorrectly because of errors in procedures or systems within the department
    Procedure matchingErrors due to failure to match patient presentation to procedure on request form
    DoseErrors due to administration of incorrect dose
    RadiopharmaceuticalErrors due to administration of incorrect radiopharmaceutical
    Intravenous accessErrors due to lack of proper intravenous access
    Request formProcedure performed incorrectly because request form was ambiguous
    Quality controlProcedure performed incorrectly because staff failed to complete quality control test
    Booking errorsInternal and external systemsBooking errors before patient reaches MRS personnel, due to systems outside department (e.g., electronic x-ray requests) or within department (e.g., reception)
    Request formBooking errors due to use of duplicate or nonoriginal request form
    Other errorsStudents/new graduatesErrors by students or new graduates due to inadequate supervision by MRS personnel
    TrainingErrors due to inadequate training on software, equipment, or procedures
    Exposure to radiationErrors causing the staff or the public to unintentionally be exposed to radiation
    Radiopharmaceutical spillageErrors causing a radiopharmaceutical to unintentionally be spilled
    • MRS = medical radiation science.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Number of Incidents

    Error typeIncidents (n)
    TOP noncompliance179 (85.6%)
     Patient interview TOP26 (12.4%)
      Noncompliance19 (9.1%)
      Errors in request form5 (2.4%)
      Failure to check for pregnancy/breastfeeding2 (1.0%)
     Procedural TOP153 (73.2%)
      Handover error4 (1.9%)
      Staff error14 (6.7%)
      Errors in internal systems3 (1.4%)
      Lack of procedure matching15 (7.2%)
      Incorrect dose15 (7.2%)
      Incorrect radiopharmaceutical76 (36.4%)
      Lack of intravenous access19 (9.1%)
      Request form ambiguity3 (1.4%)
      Lack of quality control4 (1.9%)
    Booking errors9 (4.3%)
     Errors in internal or external systems5 (2.4%)
     Use of nonoriginal request form4 (1.9%)
    Other errors21 (10.0%)
     Inadequate student/new-graduate supervision6 (2.9%)
     Inadequate training4 (1.9%)
     Exposure of staff or public to radiation1 (0.5%)
     Spillage of radiopharmaceutical10 (4.8%)
    Total209
    • View popup
    TABLE 3

    Recommendations to Prevent Incidents

    CategoryRecommendation
    Radiopharmacy trainingProvide extensive training for new staff members
    Radiopharmacy managementImplement integrated software packages
    Radiopharmaceutical administration and doseUse coordinated approach in which all nuclear medicine professionals address administration and dose errors
    Pediatric dosing and weight estimationUse correct calculators and formulas
    Departmental protocolsProvide in writing, regularly update, and keep readily accessible
    EducationTeach TOP to all staff and audit for compliance
    Students/new graduatesImprove supervision
    Error reportingRemove disincentives
    SafetyCreate culture of safety throughout department
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology: 44 (4)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
Vol. 44, Issue 4
December 1, 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Recommendations for Nuclear Medicine Technologists Drawn from an Analysis of Errors Reported in Australian Radiation Incident Registers
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology web site.
Citation Tools
Recommendations for Nuclear Medicine Technologists Drawn from an Analysis of Errors Reported in Australian Radiation Incident Registers
Nicole Kearney, Gary Denham
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Dec 2016, 44 (4) 243-247; DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.116.178517

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Recommendations for Nuclear Medicine Technologists Drawn from an Analysis of Errors Reported in Australian Radiation Incident Registers
Nicole Kearney, Gary Denham
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Dec 2016, 44 (4) 243-247; DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.116.178517
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Technical Peer Review: Methods and Outcomes
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Diagnostic Reference Levels in PET Imaging at Chulabhorn Hospital, Thailand
  • Experiences of Nuclear Medicine Technologists Working in PET/CT Facilities in Gauteng Province, South Africa
  • Establishment of National Diagnostic Reference Levels for Administered Activity in Diagnostic Nuclear Medicine in Thailand
Show more RADIATION SAFETY

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • adverse events
  • incident reporting
  • patient safety
  • radiation safety
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire