Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
      • JNMT Supplement
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Watch or Listen to JNMT Podcast
  • Visit SNMMI on Facebook
  • Join SNMMI on LinkedIn
  • Follow SNMMI on Twitter
  • Subscribe to JNMT RSS feeds
Research ArticleINSTRUMENTATION

The Impact of Acquisition Time on Image Quality in Whole-Body 18F-FDG PET/CT for Cancer Staging

Daniel Hausmann, Dietmar J. Dinter, Maliha Sadick, Joachim Brade, Stefan O. Schoenberg and Karen Büsing
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology December 2012, 40 (4) 255-258; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.112.103291
Daniel Hausmann
1Institute for Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dietmar J. Dinter
1Institute for Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maliha Sadick
1Institute for Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joachim Brade
2Institute of Medical Statistics, University Medical Center Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stefan O. Schoenberg
1Institute for Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karen Büsing
1Institute for Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Information

vol. 40 no. 4 255-258
DOI 
https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.112.103291
PubMed 
23071347

Published By 
Society of Nuclear Medicine
Print ISSN 
0091-4916
Online ISSN 
1535-5675
History 
  • Received for publication January 17, 2012
  • Accepted for publication April 2, 2012
  • Published online December 4, 2012.

Article Versions

  • previous version (October 15, 2012 - 05:20).
  • You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Copyright & Usage 
© 2012 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.

Author Information

  1. Daniel Hausmann1,
  2. Dietmar J. Dinter1,
  3. Maliha Sadick1,
  4. Joachim Brade2,
  5. Stefan O. Schoenberg1 and
  6. Karen Büsing1
  1. 1Institute for Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; and
  2. 2Institute of Medical Statistics, University Medical Center Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
  1. For correspondence contact: Daniel Hausmann, Institute of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany. E-mail: daniel.hausmann{at}umm.de
View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Cited By...

  • 16 Citations
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Total-body PET/CT using half-dose FDG and compared with conventional PET/CT using full-dose FDG in lung cancer
    Hui Tan, Xiuli Sui, Hongyan Yin, Haojun Yu, Yusen Gu, Shuguang Chen, Pengcheng Hu, Wujian Mao, Hongcheng Shi
    European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 2021 48 6
  • For avid glucose tumors, the SUV peak is the most reliable parameter for [18F]FDG-PET/CT quantification, regardless of acquisition time
    Avigaëlle Sher, Franck Lacoeuille, Pacôme Fosse, Laurent Vervueren, Aurélie Cahouet-Vannier, Djamel Dabli, Francis Bouchet, Olivier Couturier
    EJNMMI Research 2016 6 1
  • Influences on PET Quantification and Interpretation
    Julian M. M. Rogasch, Frank Hofheinz, Lutz van Heek, Conrad-Amadeus Voltin, Ronald Boellaard, Carsten Kobe
    Diagnostics 2022 12 2
  • Optimization of PET protocol and interrater reliability of 18F-PSMA-11 imaging of prostate cancer
    Sarah Piron, Kathia De Man, Vanessa Schelfhout, Nick Van Laeken, Ken Kersemans, Eric Achten, Filip De Vos, Piet Ost
    EJNMMI Research 2020 10 1
  • Dependence of image quality on acquisition time for the PET/CT Biograph mCT
    Flavia Molina-Duran, Dietmar Dinter, Frederic Schoenahl, Stefan O. Schoenberg, Gerhard Glatting
    Zeitschrift für Medizinische Physik 2014 24 1
  • Diagnostic Accuracy of 18F Choline PET/CT using Time-of-Flight Reconstruction Algorithm in Prostate Cancer Patients With Biochemical Recurrence
    Daniel Hausmann, Leonardo K. Bittencourt, Ulrike I. Attenberger, Metin Sertdemir, Anja Weidner, Karen A. Büsing, Joachim Brade, Frederik Wenz, Stefan O. Schoenberg, Dietmar J. Dinter
    Clinical Nuclear Medicine 2014 39 3
  • Quality Assessment in FDG-PET/CT Imaging of Head-and-Neck Cancer: One Home Run Is Better Than Two Doubles
    Tim Van den Wyngaert, Stijn De Schepper, Laurens Carp
    Frontiers in Oncology 2020 10
  • Quantification accuracy of neuro-oncology PET data as a function of emission scan duration in PET/MR compared to PET/CT
    Stefan Wampl, Ivo Rausch, Tatjana Traub-Weidinger, Thomas Beyer, Martin Gröschl, Jacobo Cal-González
    European Journal of Radiology 2017 95
  • Sensitivity of 18F-fluorodihydrotestosterone PET-CT to count statistics and reconstruction protocol in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer
    Matthijs C. F. Cysouw, Gerbrand M. Kramer, Dennis Heijtel, Robert C. Schuit, Michael J. Morris, Alfons J. M. van den Eertwegh, Jens Voortman, Otto S. Hoekstra, Daniela E. Oprea-Lager, Ronald Boellaard
    EJNMMI Research 2019 9 1
  • A proper protocol for routine 18F-FDG uEXPLORER total-body PET/CT scans
    Huiran Hu, Yanchao Huang, Hongyan Sun, Kemin Zhou, Li Jiang, Jinmei Zhong, Li Chen, Lijuan Wang, Yanjiang Han, Hubing Wu
    EJNMMI Physics 2023 10 1

Article usage

Article usage: October 2012 to April 2025

AbstractFullPdf
Oct 20127904
Nov 201213106
Dec 2012312115
Jan 2013305322
Feb 20134052665
Mar 20131542241
Apr 2013901826
May 20131012027
Jun 201372713
Jul 2013611023
Aug 2013561112
Sep 201363612
Oct 201389820
Nov 20138237
Dec 20134665
Jan 2014601011
Feb 201457916
Mar 2014491511
Apr 2014391019
May 201457419
Jun 2014641014
Jul 201436817
Aug 2014301614
Sep 20143267
Oct 2014421011
Nov 201439712
Dec 20142766
Jan 201538611
Feb 201526311
Mar 20152088
Apr 2015471212
May 201525715
Jun 201526118
Jul 2015451918
Aug 2015241714
Sep 20152267
Oct 20151268
Nov 2015251411
Dec 201521107
Jan 201631129
Feb 201622713
Mar 2016311315
Apr 201624812
May 2016281812
Jun 2016161512
Jul 20161536
Aug 201625711
Sep 20162077
Oct 201627818
Nov 2016271218
Dec 2016826621
Jan 201730135
Feb 2017281722
Mar 2017221010
Apr 20171644
May 20172068
Jun 201720813
Jul 201712610
Aug 2017162511
Sep 201728108
Oct 2017251421
Nov 2017231722
Dec 20171067
Jan 201816712
Feb 201816925
Mar 201820517
Apr 201820819
May 201811329
Jun 201819629
Jul 201816939
Aug 201810530
Sep 201812424
Oct 2018191128
Nov 201841343
Dec 2018132145
Jan 20194224
Feb 201914421
Mar 20197425
Apr 2019221128
May 201931121
Jun 2019111711
Jul 2019351322
Aug 2019211414
Sep 20199511
Oct 201915723
Nov 201911318
Dec 20191295
Jan 202071011
Feb 20204919
Mar 20208412
Apr 202017613
May 20205516
Jun 202011106
Jul 2020647
Aug 2020889
Sep 20201664
Oct 202018812
Nov 2020111329
Dec 2020366
Jan 202151415
Feb 202143628
Mar 2021172823
Apr 202110917
May 202182122
Jun 2021119015
Jul 202181118
Aug 202171712
Sep 20215188
Oct 202132131
Nov 2021111930
Dec 202193513
Jan 202242118
Feb 202252214
Mar 202291916
Apr 20225158
May 202242514
Jun 202242817
Jul 20222199
Aug 202271412
Sep 202221612
Oct 202210117
Nov 20229107
Dec 20225127
Jan 20233134
Feb 2023577
Mar 202331625
Apr 20233209
May 2023976
Jun 20234125
Jul 2023111414
Aug 2023233
Sep 20235178
Oct 20235117
Nov 202342910
Dec 202323010
Jan 20246124
Feb 20242113
Mar 202461448
Apr 202472220
May 2024124217
Jun 2024113916
Jul 20247921
Aug 2024112416
Sep 2024232940
Oct 2024131315
Nov 20249167
Dec 202411126
Jan 20252116
Feb 20255347
Mar 2025104511
Apr 2025124838
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology: 40 (4)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
Vol. 40, Issue 4
December 1, 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Impact of Acquisition Time on Image Quality in Whole-Body 18F-FDG PET/CT for Cancer Staging
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology web site.
Citation Tools
The Impact of Acquisition Time on Image Quality in Whole-Body 18F-FDG PET/CT for Cancer Staging
Daniel Hausmann, Dietmar J. Dinter, Maliha Sadick, Joachim Brade, Stefan O. Schoenberg, Karen Büsing
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Dec 2012, 40 (4) 255-258; DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.112.103291

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The Impact of Acquisition Time on Image Quality in Whole-Body 18F-FDG PET/CT for Cancer Staging
Daniel Hausmann, Dietmar J. Dinter, Maliha Sadick, Joachim Brade, Stefan O. Schoenberg, Karen Büsing
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Dec 2012, 40 (4) 255-258; DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.112.103291
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Assessment of Minimum 124I Activity Required in Uptake Measurements Before Radioiodine Therapy for Benign Thyroid Diseases
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • A Novel 141Ce-Based Flood Field Phantom: Assessment of Suitability for Daily Uniformity Testing in a Clinical Nuclear Medicine Department
  • Proof of Concept: Design and Initial Evaluation of a Device to Measure Gastrointestinal Transit Time
  • Rotation Radius Dependence of 123I-FP-CIT and 123I-IBZM SPECT Uptake Ratios: A Monte Carlo Study
Show more Instrumentation

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • PET/CT
  • acquisition time
  • image quality
  • Staging
  • oncology
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire