Skip to main content
  • Main menu
  • User menu
  • Search
  • English ▼
    • English
    • Afrikaans
    • Albanian
    • Amharic
    • Arabic
    • Armenian
    • Azerbaijani
    • Basque
    • Belarusian
    • Bengali
    • Bosnian
    • Bulgarian
    • Catalan
    • Cebuano
    • Chichewa
    • Chinese (Simplified)
    • Chinese (Traditional)
    • Corsican
    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Danish
    • Dutch
    • Esperanto
    • Estonian
    • Filipino
    • Finnish
    • French
    • Frisian
    • Galician
    • Georgian
    • German
    • Greek
    • Gujarati
    • Haitian Creole
    • Hausa
    • Hawaiian
    • Hebrew
    • Hindi
    • Hmong
    • Hungarian
    • Icelandic
    • Igbo
    • Indonesian
    • Irish
    • Italian
    • Japanese
    • Javanese
    • Kannada
    • Kazakh
    • Khmer
    • Korean
    • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
    • Kyrgyz
    • Lao
    • Latin
    • Latvian
    • Lithuanian
    • Luxembourgish
    • Macedonian
    • Malagasy
    • Malay
    • Malayalam
    • Maltese
    • Maori
    • Marathi
    • Mongolian
    • Myanmar (Burmese)
    • Nepali
    • Norwegian
    • Pashto
    • Persian
    • Polish
    • Portuguese
    • Punjabi
    • Romanian
    • Russian
    • Samoan
    • Scottish Gaelic
    • Serbian
    • Sesotho
    • Shona
    • Sindhi
    • Sinhala
    • Slovak
    • Slovenian
    • Somali
    • Spanish
    • Sudanese
    • Swahili
    • Swedish
    • Tajik
    • Tamil
    • Telugu
    • Thai
    • Turkish
    • Ukrainian
    • Urdu
    • Uzbek
    • Vietnamese
    • Welsh
    • Xhosa
    • Yiddish
    • Yoruba
    • Zulu

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
      • JNMT Supplement
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

Advanced Search

English ▼
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scottish Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sudanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu
  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Watch or Listen to JNMT Podcast
  • Visit SNMMI on Facebook
  • Join SNMMI on LinkedIn
  • Follow SNMMI on Twitter
  • Subscribe to JNMT RSS feeds
Research ArticleCONTINUING EDUCATION

A Practical Guide to Quality Improvement in Nuclear Medicine

Mary Beth Farrell and Sue H. Abreu
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology December 2012, 40 (4) 211-219; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.112.111880
Mary Beth Farrell
1Intersocietal Accreditation Commission, Ellicott City, Maryland; and
CNMT
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sue H. Abreu
2IAC Board of Directors
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    P-D-S-A Cycle: A problem-solving model for effecting change.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    P-D-S-A cycle with detailed steps.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    Sample data collection tool to assess interobserver variability in reporting of myocardial perfusion defects. Tool documents overall study result (normal/abnormal); defect size (small/medium/large), severity (mild/moderate/severe), and type (reversible/mixed/persistent); location based on 17-segment model (normal/abnormal); ejection fraction (normal/mildly decreased/moderately decreased/severely decreased); regional wall motion ab-normality (anterior/lateral/inferior/septal/apical); and artifact (none/breast tissue/soft tissue/motion/subdiaphragmatic activity/extravasated dose).

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    Multicycle project graph demonstrating progress of project toward predetermined goal. This example demonstrates appropriateness of myocardial perfusion imaging over time. Once goal was met, monitoring continued to ensure that achievement was maintained. Q = quarter.

  • FIGURE 1A.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1A.

    Sample data collection tool to assess improvement in quality of myocardial perfusion images.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    10-Step Case Study: Adequacy of Patient Preparation for Pharmacologic Stress

    StageStepDescription
    PlanIdentify problemNuclear cardiology laboratory that performs exercise and pharmacologic stress myocardial perfusion imaging notices that many patients arrive for appointment carrying large cup of coffee from new shop next door. It would be easy to assume that presence of shop is cause of problem. However, practice decides to investigate if other factors could be involved.
    Gather informationLaboratory gathers information about its current procedures, looking at patient preparation form, scheduling process, and patient confirmation process.
    State goal and set targetsLaboratory sets goal of improving patient compliance with caffeine restriction before myocardial perfusion imaging.
    Laboratory wants 90% of patients to be in compliance with patient preparation instructions.
    Design data collection strategyLaboratory creates simple form to record patient name, whether patient consumed caffeine within 18 h of test, staff member who scheduled patient, date patient was scheduled, referring office and its staff member who scheduled patient, staff member who confirmed appointment before test, date appointment was confirmed, and whether preparation instructions were personally discussed with patient.
    Laboratory decides, for 2 wk, to survey every patient scheduled for myocardial perfusion imaging.
    DoCollect dataFor 2 wk, laboratory surveys every patient scheduled for myocardial perfusion imaging.
    Analyze dataLaboratory compiles data into spreadsheet and highlights data associated with patients who consumed caffeine or for other reasons were inadequately prepared for examination. Percentage of patients inadequately prepared is calculated.
    StudyShare resultsLaboratory schedules staff meeting.
    Select action planAfter examining data, laboratory realizes that most caffeine-consuming patients came from one referring office. In addition, many of those patients were not personally reached by staff member responsible for confirming test.
    Plan is formulated to educate culprit referring office and to revise patient instruction form to highlight importance of caffeine restriction.
    ActImplement changeLaboratory does in-service training with all staff and conducts lunch-and-learn session with culprit office to emphasize importance of appropriate patient preparation and consequences of inappropriate preparation. Revised patient preparation form is provided to culprit office.
    RepeatLaboratory then repeats data collection for 2 wk and notices decrease in number of coffee-drinking arrivals who were scheduled from culprit office.
    Laboratory decides to conduct lunch-and-learn sessions and provide new form to all referring physician offices.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology: 40 (4)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
Vol. 40, Issue 4
December 1, 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools
Share
A Practical Guide to Quality Improvement in Nuclear Medicine
Mary Beth Farrell, Sue H. Abreu
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Dec 2012, 40 (4) 211-219; DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.112.111880
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MONITORING VERSUS IMPROVING: QUALITY CONTROL VERSUS QUALITY IMPROVEMENT
    • APPROACHING QUALITY IMPROVEMENT: THE PLAN-DO-STUDY-ACT (P-D-S-A) CYCLE
    • UNDERSTANDING QUALITY IMPROVEMENT: THE TEN STEPS EXPLAINED
    • TYPES OF QUALITY IMPROVEMENT ACTIVITIES
    • QUALITY IMPROVEMENT MEETINGS
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • APPENDIX A
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • The Importance of Measurement for Quality Improvement: Submaximal Cardiac Stress Testing
  • Nuclear Medicine Technologists Perception and Current Assessment of Quality: A Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Technologist Section Survey
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Illuminating the Hidden: Standardizing Cardiac MIBG Imaging for Sympathetic Dysfunction
  • PET/CT Case Series: Unmasking the Mystery of Cardiac Sarcoidosis
  • Delivery Methods of Radiopharmaceuticals: Exploring Global Strategies to Minimize Occupational Radiation Exposure
Show more Continuing Education

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • quality improvement
  • quality control
  • accuracy
  • efficiency
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire
Alerts for this Article
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email this Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Practical Guide to Quality Improvement in Nuclear Medicine
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology web site.
Citation Tools
A Practical Guide to Quality Improvement in Nuclear Medicine
Mary Beth Farrell, Sue H. Abreu
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Dec 2012, 40 (4) 211-219; DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.112.111880

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience

By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies.