Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
      • JNMT Supplement
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Watch or Listen to JNMT Podcast
  • Visit SNMMI on Facebook
  • Join SNMMI on LinkedIn
  • Follow SNMMI on Twitter
  • Subscribe to JNMT RSS feeds
OtherIMAGING

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Subtraction Scintigraphy in Patients with Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Tract Hemorrhage

Geoffrey M. Currie
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology September 2007, 35 (3) 140-147; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.106.037655
Geoffrey M. Currie
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1. 

    Composite diagnostic algorithm for patients with LGIH. A% and B% represent alternative diagnostic strategies. +ve = positive; −ve = negative.

  • FIGURE 2. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2. 

    Decision-tree analysis for CS alone, with totals of 34 deaths and 83 complications and total cost of $943,128. FN = false-negative results; FP = false-positive results; TN = true-negative results; TP = true-positive results; +ve = positive; −ve = negative.

  • FIGURE 3. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3. 

    Decision-tree analysis for CS, RSS, and ASSS combined, with totals of 28 deaths and 70 complications and total cost of $869,284. FN = false-negative results; FP = false-positive results; TN = true-negative results; TP = true-positive results; +ve = positive; −ve = negative.

  • FIGURE 4. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4. 

    Decision-tree analysis for CS and ASSS combined, with totals of 26 deaths and 64 complications and total cost of $787,344. FN = false-negative results; FP = false-positive results; TN = true-negative results; TP = true-positive results; +ve = positive; −ve = negative.

  • FIGURE 5. 
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 5. 

    Composite diagnostic algorithm for patients with LGIH, with minor adjustments to proportions. A% and B% represent alternative diagnostic strategies. +ve = positive; −ve = negative.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Summary of Data Used in Analysis

    VariableValue (reference)
    Mean life expectancy80.5 y (7)
    Mortality rate for patients with acute LGIH*4% (3,8)
    Scintigraphy-associated mortality0% (9)
    Scintigraphy-associated complication rate0% (9)
    Scintigraphy-associated cost$492 (6)
    Angiography-associated mortality0% (3,9,10)
    Angiography-associated complication rate*2% (3,9,10)
    Angiography-associated cost$1,376 (6)
    Embolization-associated complication rate*0% (11)
    Embolization-associated cost$144 (6)
    Surgery-associated mortality, with localization of bleeding13% (12,13)
    Surgery-associated mortality, without localization of bleeding30% (12,13)
    Surgery-associated complication rate, with localization of bleeding15% (14)
    Surgery-associated complication rate, without localization of bleeding83% (14)
    Surgery-associated cost$1,124 (6)
    Surgery as a result of positive scintigraphy15% (20)
    Angiography as a result of positive scintigraphy85% (20)
    Positive angiography and positive scintigraphy39% (20)
    Negative angiography and positive scintigraphy61% (20)
    Positive angiograms only suggestive of bleeding42% (20)
    Rate of rebleeding in acute LGIH15% (15,16)
    Positive angiography leading to surgery25% (20)
    Positive angiography leading to embolization50% (20)
    Blind surgery12% (17)
    • ↵* Conservative estimate based on lower end of reported range.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Summary of Clinical Results Used in Analysis

    VariableValue
    Mean age of patient cohort68.9 y
    Rate of false-positive findings for CS alone10.3%
    Rate of false-negative findings for CS alone1.1%
    Rate of true-positive findings for CS alone14.8%
    Rate of true-negative findings for CS alone73.8%
    Rate of false-positive findings for CS and subtraction4.0%
    Rate of false-negative findings for CS and subtraction1.7%
    Rate of true-positive findings for CS and subtraction14.4%
    Rate of true-negative findings for CS and subtraction79.9%
    Negative scintigraphy; rescanned because of rebleeding*8%
    • ↵* Only one iteration was used.

    • View popup
    TABLE 3

    Summary of Data Used in Sensitivity Analysis

    VariableValue (reference)
    Angiogram complication rate11% (18)
    Surgery-associated mortality, with localization of bleeding10% (19)
    Surgery-associated mortality, without localization of bleeding57% (19)
    • View popup
    TABLE 4

    Results of Sensitivity Analysis of Decision-Tree Data Obtained with Various Subtraction Techniques

    Reduction compared with CS alone
    StrategyParameterThis studyWorst-case scenarioBest-case scenario
    CS, RSS, and ASSSCost per patient$74$32$74
    Complications13320
    Deaths628
    CS and ASSSCost per patient$65$65$156
    Complications19728
    Deaths8314
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology: 35 (3)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
Vol. 35, Issue 3
September 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Subtraction Scintigraphy in Patients with Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Tract Hemorrhage
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology web site.
Citation Tools
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Subtraction Scintigraphy in Patients with Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Tract Hemorrhage
Geoffrey M. Currie
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Sep 2007, 35 (3) 140-147; DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.106.037655

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Subtraction Scintigraphy in Patients with Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Tract Hemorrhage
Geoffrey M. Currie
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Sep 2007, 35 (3) 140-147; DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.106.037655
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Improvement of Anatomic Alignment and Image Quality Using a Respiratory Motion Reduction Block in Oncologic PET/CT
  • Single- Versus Dual-Time-Point Imaging for Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloid Using 99mTc-Pyrophosphate
  • Early 10-Minute Postinjection [18F]F-FAPI-42 uEXPLORER Total-Body PET/CT Scanning Protocol for Staging Lung Cancer Using HYPER Iterative Reconstruction
Show more Imaging

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire