Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
      • JNMT Supplement
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Watch or Listen to JNMT Podcast
  • Visit SNMMI on Facebook
  • Join SNMMI on LinkedIn
  • Follow SNMMI on Twitter
  • Subscribe to JNMT RSS feeds
OtherNUCLEAR PHARMACY

Experimental Determination of Dose Calibrator Settings and Study of Associated Volume Dependence in V-Vials for Rhenium-186 Perrhenate Solution Sources

Brian E. Zimmerman and David W. Pipes
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology December 2000, 28 (4) 264-270;
Brian E. Zimmerman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David W. Pipes
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Volume dependence of dose calibrator (CRC-12) dial setting, DS, on filling mass, m, in 3-mL Ace Glass v-vials. The uncertainty bars correspond to an expanded uncertainty interval with a coverage factor of k = 2. The line through the data is the resulting fit using an equation of the form (DS)−1 = a + b/m, where a and b are fitting constants.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    Volume dependence of dose calibrator (CRC-12) dial setting, DS, on filling mass in 3-mL Wheaton v-vials. The uncertainty bars correspond to an expanded uncertainty interval with a coverage factor of k = 2. The line through the data is the resulting fit using an equation of the form (DS)−1 = a + b/m, where a and b are fitting constants.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1.

    Input Atomic and Nuclear Data for EMI Calculations of the Detection Efficiencies of Electron Capture (EC) Branches in the Decay of Rhenium-186*

    Variable nameInput values, excited state branchInput values, ground state branch
    Atomic data
     ′WK, WL0.587, 0.4130.587, 0.413
     PKLL, PLKM, PKMM0.69, 0.29, 0.020.69, 0.29, 0.02
     EKLL, EKLM, EKMM, ELMM47.8, 56.2, 64.7, 8.047.8, 56.2, 64.7, 8.0
     PKL, PKM0.83, 0.170.83, 0.17
     EKL, EKM, ELM58.80, 67.1, 8.8758.80, 67.1, 8.87
     EK, EL, EM69.5, 11.5, 2.3769.5, 11.5, 2.37
    Nuclear data
     PK, PL, PM0.78, 0.16, 0.050.79, 0.16, 0.05
     ′EGAM, PGAM122.3, 1.0—
     ′PCIK, PCIL, PCIM0.33, 0.51, 0.13—
    • ↵* Nuclear data are taken from reference 5, atomic data are taken from reference 9. See reference 6 for an explanation of the input file format.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2.

    Uncertainty Components Evaluated in the Determination of the Massic Activity CA (in units of MBq · g−1) for Rhenium-186 Perrhenate Solution Used in Experiment 1

    ComponentComment%
    LS measurement repeatabilityStandard deviation in CA for 10 repeated measurements on a single LS cocktail; average for 8 independent LS cocktails.0.13
    LS cocktail variabilityStandard deviation in CA for 8 independently prepared LS cocktails; average for 8 independent LS cocktails.0.0091
    LS composition variabilityStandard deviation for determination of CA for LS cocktails containing 0.9% aqueous fraction as H2O (4 cocktails) and 0.9% aqueous fraction as 9% saline (4 cocktails).0.15
    186Re half-lifeStandard uncertainty in half-life (0.08%) over the measurement decay interval.0.0023
    186Re EC branching ratioStandard uncertainty in EC branching (1.3%).0.08
    186Re β-branching ratioStandard uncertainty in β-branching (0.12%).0.10
    Gravimetric determinationsStandard uncertainty in mass determinations for a single LS counting source.0.05
    186Re dilution factorStandard uncertainty in gravimetric determination of dilution from 186Re master solution0.07
    3H-standard decay correctionEstimated standard uncertainty of 0.46% in the decay of the 3H standard over 18.5 a to 19 a.0.01
    3H-standard calibrationStandard uncertainty of 0.18% from NIST calibration.0.01
    3H-standard gravimetric dilutionEstimated standard uncertainty (0.06%) for gravimetrically-determined dilution factor.0.01
    Gravimetric determination of 3H LS samplesEstimated standard uncertainty of 0.05% in the mass determination of any single 3H LS cocktail.0.01
    Spectrometer dependenceStandard deviation in CA for 8 independently-prepared LS cocktails counted in 2 spectrometers.0.56
    Combined (uc = Σui)0.61
    Expanded (Uc = uc · k; k = 2)1.22
    • View popup
    TABLE 3.

    Uncertainty Components Evaluated in the Determination of the Massic Activity CA (in units of MBq · g−1) for Rhenium-186 Perrhenate Solution Used in Experiment 2

    ComponentComment%
    LS measurement repeatabilityStandard deviation in CA for 10 repeated measurements on a single LS cocktail; average for 5 independent LS cocktails.0.10
    LS cocktail variabilityStandard deviation in CA for 5 independently prepared LS cocktails; average for 5 independent LS cocktails.0.21
    186Re half-lifeStandard uncertainty in half-life (0.08%) over the measurement decay interval.0.0043
    186Re EC branching ratioStandard uncertainty in EC branching (1.3%).0.08
    186Re β-branching ratioStandard uncertainty in β-branching (0.12%).0.10
    Gravimetric determinationsStandard uncertainty in mass determinations for a single LS counting source.0.05
    186Re dilution factorStandard uncertainty in gravimetric determination of dilution from 186Re master solution0.07
    3H-standard decay correctionEstimated standard uncertainty of 0.46% in the decay of the 3H standard over 18.5 a to 19 a.0.01
    3H-standard calibrationStandard uncertainty of 0.18% from NIST calibration.0.01
    3H-standard gravimetric dilutionEstimated standard uncertainty (0.06%) for gravimetrically-determined dilution factor.0.01
    Gravimetric determination of 3H LS samplesEstimated standard uncertainty of 0.05% in the mass determination of any single 3H LS cocktail.0.01
    Spectrometer dependenceStandard deviation in CA for 5 independently-prepared LS cocktails counted in 2 spectrometers.0.0001
    Combined (uc = Σui)0.28
    Expanded (Uc = uc ·  k; k = 2)0.56
    • View popup
    TABLE 4.

    Variability in Activity Determinations Due to Inconsistencies in Glass Vial Construction for the Ace Glass and Wheaton Conical V-Vials*

    Dose calibratorDial settingRelative standard deviation
    Ace Glass vialsWheaton vials
    CRC-12475 × 100.30%0.15%
    CRC-12450 × 100.35%0.18%
    CRC-35R450 × 100.21%0.31%
    CRC-12Ionization current‡0.22%0.18%
    • * The values reported are relative standard deviations (in %) arising from measurements made on 4 vials of each type in 2 different dose calibrators.

    • ↵‡ The ionization current was read from the CRC-12 dose calibrator, which was specially modified by the manufacturer.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology: 28 (4)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
Vol. 28, Issue 4
December 1, 2000
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Experimental Determination of Dose Calibrator Settings and Study of Associated Volume Dependence in V-Vials for Rhenium-186 Perrhenate Solution Sources
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology web site.
Citation Tools
Experimental Determination of Dose Calibrator Settings and Study of Associated Volume Dependence in V-Vials for Rhenium-186 Perrhenate Solution Sources
Brian E. Zimmerman, David W. Pipes
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Dec 2000, 28 (4) 264-270;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Experimental Determination of Dose Calibrator Settings and Study of Associated Volume Dependence in V-Vials for Rhenium-186 Perrhenate Solution Sources
Brian E. Zimmerman, David W. Pipes
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Dec 2000, 28 (4) 264-270;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENT
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Determination of the Efficiency of Commercially Available Dose Calibrators for {beta}-Emitters
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The Effect of Vincristine on the Biodistribution of Technetium-99m DTPA, GHA, and DMSA in Balb/c Female Mice
  • Evaluation of an Alternative Radiochemical Purity Testing Method for Technetium-99m-Sestamibi
Show more Nuclear Pharmacy

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire