Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
      • JNMT Supplement
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Watch or Listen to JNMT Podcast
  • Visit SNMMI on Facebook
  • Join SNMMI on LinkedIn
  • Follow SNMMI on Twitter
  • Subscribe to JNMT RSS feeds
Imaging

Optimal Reconstruction Filter Parameters for Multi-Headed Brain SPECT: Dependence on Count Activity

Hong-Gang Liu, John M. Harris, Chakri S. Inampudi and James M. Mountz
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology December 1995, 23 (4) 251-257;
Hong-Gang Liu
Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John M. Harris
Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chakri S. Inampudi
Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James M. Mountz
Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Objective: Reconstruction parameters must be optimized to approach the improved spatial resolution that is theoretically possible from modern SPECT imaging devices. One important reconstruction consideration is proper selection of the back-projection filter parameters. The aim of this study was to determine which Butterworth filter optimized image resolution for brain SPECT scans.

Methods: Ten normal subjects underwent brain SPECT following an intravenous injection of 15–20 mCi 99mTc-HMPAO (5 subjects) and 30–35 mCi 99mTc-HMPAO (5 subjects). Subjects were separated into two groups based on the counts per pixel in the anterior projection image: 5 subjects with low-count images (10.4–13.9 counts/pixel) and 5 subjects with high-count images (18.3–21.5 counts/pixel). All subject projection data were reconstructed at cutoff frequencies (Fc) ranging from 0.15–0.3 Nyquist, with orders ranging from 2–12 at each frequency cutoff. Optimal image selection was determined by blinded subjective assessment by three nuclear medicine faculty capable of evaluating brain SPECT image quality.

Results: Results demonstrated that for low-count images, optimum Butterworth filter reconstruction parameters were: Fc = 0.20, order 6. For high-count images, optimum parameters were: Fc = 0.225, order 7.

Conclusion: The proper selection of Fc is the most critical parameter for optimization of image reconstruction quality.

  • SPECT
  • brain
  • image reconstruction
  • back-projection filter
  • technetium-99m-HMPAO
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology: 23 (4)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
Vol. 23, Issue 4
December 1, 1995
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Optimal Reconstruction Filter Parameters for Multi-Headed Brain SPECT: Dependence on Count Activity
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology web site.
Citation Tools
Optimal Reconstruction Filter Parameters for Multi-Headed Brain SPECT: Dependence on Count Activity
Hong-Gang Liu, John M. Harris, Chakri S. Inampudi, James M. Mountz
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Dec 1995, 23 (4) 251-257;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Optimal Reconstruction Filter Parameters for Multi-Headed Brain SPECT: Dependence on Count Activity
Hong-Gang Liu, John M. Harris, Chakri S. Inampudi, James M. Mountz
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Dec 1995, 23 (4) 251-257;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Early 10-Minute Postinjection [18F]F-FAPI-42 uEXPLORER Total-Body PET/CT Scanning Protocol for Staging Lung Cancer Using HYPER Iterative Reconstruction
  • Single- Versus Dual-Time-Point Imaging for Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloid Using 99mTc-Pyrophosphate
  • Does Arthrography Improve Accuracy of SPECT/CT for Diagnosis of Aseptic Loosening in Patients with Painful Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis
Show more Imaging

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • SPECT
  • brain
  • image reconstruction
  • back-projection filter
  • technetium-99m-HMPAO
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire