Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
      • JNMT Supplement
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Watch or Listen to JNMT Podcast
  • Visit SNMMI on Facebook
  • Join SNMMI on LinkedIn
  • Follow SNMMI on Twitter
  • Subscribe to JNMT RSS feeds
CorrectionErrata

Errata

Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology September 2012, 40 (3) 17A;
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Answers to the Questions on Pages 204 and 205

Question 1

Answer = D

A. Incorrect. Potassium analogs, such as 201Tl, are actively transported into cells, for example, myocytes, via the Na-K pump.

B. Incorrect. 67Ga citrate is an iron analog that binds to and is circulated by transferrins, ceruloplasmins, and serum-binding proteins. Ultimately, 67Ga preferentially binds to chelates, such as lactoferrin, which are present in higher concentrations at sites of inflammation and infection.

C. Incorrect. Diphosphonates (e.g., methylene diphosphonate used in bone scans) localize to bone and osteoblast surfaces on the basis of ion exchange.

D. Correct. Heat denaturing of red blood cells converts them into rigid spherocytes, which are then sequestered in the spleen via its normal filtering physiology. Additionally, like 99mTc-colloids, 99mTc-DRBCs are phagocytized by the reticuloendothelial system. However, DRBCs and colloids have different levels of overlapping biodistributions, as is described in the case discussion.

Question 2

Answer = A

CT and MRI are not sensitive or specific in the detection of splenosis due to the broad differential of soft-tissue masses, including the evaluation of pulmonary nodules (e.g., metastases, mesothelioma, lymphoma, invasive thymoma, primary neoplasm, and pleural plaques). 99mTc-DRBCs have a higher ratio of target uptake (splenic tissue) to background uptake, contributing to a higher sensitivity and specificity than are obtained with radiolabeled sulfur colloid scans (1,2).

The continuing education test for “Breast Imaging Devices for Nuclear Medicine,” by Prekeges (J Nucl Med Technol. 2012;40:71–78), contained some errors. The correct test is available on the SNMMI Web site at http://interactive.snmmi.org/index.cfm?PageID=11769. We regret the error.

On page 213 of the article “SNM Practice Guideline for Hepatobiliary Scintigraphy 4.0,” by Tulchinsky et al. (J Nucl Med Technol. 2010;38:210–218), a sincalide infusion dose was listed incorrectly (0.15 μg/kg). The correct statement follows: “A dataset with infusion of 0.015 μg/kg over 45 min and GBEF measured at 60 min showed acceptable variability.” The authors regret the error.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology: 40 (3)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
Vol. 40, Issue 3
September 1, 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Errata
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology web site.
Citation Tools
Errata
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Sep 2012, 40 (3) 17A;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Errata
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Sep 2012, 40 (3) 17A;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Breast Imaging Devices for Nuclear Medicine
  • Respiratory Muscle 18F-FDG Uptake
  • Reply: Respiratory Muscle 18F-FDG Uptake
  • SNM Practice Guideline for Hepatobiliary Scintigraphy 4.0
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Errata
  • Errata
Show more Errata

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire