Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
      • JNMT Supplement
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Watch or Listen to JNMT Podcast
  • Visit SNMMI on Facebook
  • Join SNMMI on LinkedIn
  • Follow SNMMI on Twitter
  • Subscribe to JNMT RSS feeds
Articles

Importance of Correct Photopeak Setting in Nuclear Medicine Imaging Procedures

Jeannine T. Lewis, Thomas N. Padikal, Stephen R. Thomas and James G. Kereiakes
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology September 1978, 6 (3) 141-144;
Jeannine T. Lewis
Nuclear Medicine Laboratory, Bureau of Radiological Health, George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, D. C., and University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas N. Padikal
Nuclear Medicine Laboratory, Bureau of Radiological Health, George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, D. C., and University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephen R. Thomas
Nuclear Medicine Laboratory, Bureau of Radiological Health, George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, D. C., and University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James G. Kereiakes
Nuclear Medicine Laboratory, Bureau of Radiological Health, George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, D. C., and University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Most scintillation camera systems currently use an analog display for photopeak selection. A systematic evaluation of this peak setting procedure was undertaken to investigate its accuracy and effect upon the resultant image. The scintillation camera we selected provided both an analog and a multichannel analyzer (MCA) display of the spectrum. For each data collection, the investigator set the Co-57 peak symmetrically using the MCA. Polaroid images were taken of the resultant field flood. Several technologists were then asked to set the Co-57 peak using the analog display; additional Polaroid images were obtained of the ensuing field floods. The field flood images thus obtained were given to a panel for evaluation. The panel ranked as “best” those field flood images taken with the peak symmetrically aligned. In addition, a series of patient images was obtained at various peak settings. When this series was evaluated by the panel, the patient images obtained with the peak set too high were judged to be of unacceptable diagnostic quality. The accuracy needed for a diagnostically useful image is often not achieved by using an analog display for photopeak setting. The use of an MCA enables an accurate and objective method of selecting the peak.

Footnotes

  • ↵* Present address: Div. of Training and Medical Applications, BRH, Rockville, MD.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology: 6 (3)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
Vol. 6, Issue 3
September 1, 1978
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Importance of Correct Photopeak Setting in Nuclear Medicine Imaging Procedures
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology web site.
Citation Tools
Importance of Correct Photopeak Setting in Nuclear Medicine Imaging Procedures
Jeannine T. Lewis, Thomas N. Padikal, Stephen R. Thomas, James G. Kereiakes
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Sep 1978, 6 (3) 141-144;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Importance of Correct Photopeak Setting in Nuclear Medicine Imaging Procedures
Jeannine T. Lewis, Thomas N. Padikal, Stephen R. Thomas, James G. Kereiakes
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Sep 1978, 6 (3) 141-144;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The Nuclear Medicine Technology Certification Board: Growing with the Profession to Meet the Needs of the Future
  • The Decline and Fall of the Rectilinear Scanner: Nuclear Medicine Instrumentation 1970–1995
  • Nuclear Oncology
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire