Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
      • JNMT Supplement
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Watch or Listen to JNMT Podcast
  • Visit SNMMI on Facebook
  • Join SNMMI on LinkedIn
  • Follow SNMMI on Twitter
  • Subscribe to JNMT RSS feeds
Research ArticleBrief Communication

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy in Merkel Cell Carcinoma: A Comprehensive Review

Emran Askari, Soroush Zarehparvar Moghadam, Damian Wild, Ebrahim Delpassand, Sergio Baldari, Bernhard Nilica, Philipp E. Hartrampf, Grace Kong, Chiara Maria Grana, Martin Alexander Walter, Francesca Capoccetti, Pashtoon Murtaza Kasi and Jonathan Strosberg
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology March 2023, 51 (1) 22-25; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.122.264904
Emran Askari
1Nuclear Medicine Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Soroush Zarehparvar Moghadam
1Nuclear Medicine Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Damian Wild
2ENETS Center of Excellence, Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ebrahim Delpassand
3Department of Clinical Nuclear Medicine, Excel Diagnostics Imaging Clinic, Houston, Texas;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sergio Baldari
4Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and of Morpho-Functional Imaging, University of Messina, Messina, Italy;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bernhard Nilica
5Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Philipp E. Hartrampf
6Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Grace Kong
7Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology and Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chiara Maria Grana
8Division of Nuclear Medicine, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Martin Alexander Walter
9Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Division, Geneva Medical Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Francesca Capoccetti
10UOC Nuclear Medicine–PET Center–Single Regional Center for Radiometabolic Therapy, Department of Radiological Diagnosis and Services, ASUR Marche Area Vasta 3, Macerata, Italy;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pashtoon Murtaza Kasi
11Meyer Cancer Center and Englander Institute of Precision Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jonathan Strosberg
12Neuroendocrine Tumor Division, Gastrointestinal Department, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Visual Abstract

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Abstract

Merkel cell carcinoma is a rare, aggressive skin malignancy, also known as neuroendocrine carcinoma of the skin, with high rates of recurrence and distant metastasis. In refractory metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (mMCC), besides immunotherapy, chemotherapy, and radiation, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) may be a viable option since this type of tumor can express somatostatin receptors. Methods: We performed a comprehensive review of the literature to evaluate the efficacy of PRRT in mMCC patients. Results: Thirty-seven patients with mMCC received PRRT (1–5 cycles) with 177Lu- or 90Y-labeled somatostatin analogs (cumulative activity, 1.5–30 GBq). Radiographic response was available for 19 of 28 patients who received PRRT alone. Six (31.6%) of 19 patients showed objective responses, from partial to complete, and no severe adverse events were reported. Conclusion: Our analysis supports the use of PRRT in mMCC with sufficient somatostatin receptor uptake, although the quality of the available evidence is low. Prospective clinical trials are already in development and have started accruing in some parts of the world.

  • PRRT
  • SSTR
  • Merkel cell carcinoma
  • theranostics
  • Lu-177

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, aggressive skin malignancy. The known risk factors for MCC are immunosuppression and extensive exposure to ultraviolet light. It usually occurs in elderly patients (median age, 70 y); typically arises in the head, neck, or extremities; and is slightly more common in men. Treatments for MCC vary depending on the stage of the disease, from complete surgical resection with or without radiation therapy for localized disease to systemic therapies (immunotherapy or chemotherapy) for metastatic disease. The 5-y survival rates for patients with metastatic disease have been approximately 18% (1,2). Although the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors has shown promising results, with an approximately 50% objective response, about half of patients with metastatic MCC (mMCC) experience disease progression or resistance.

At least one third of MCC cases express high levels of somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) (3,4). In some studies, SSTR expression has been reported in as many as 80%–100% of MCC cases (5). There have even been reports of using SSAs for the treatment of MCC (4). A recent trial of a novel second-generation SSA (pasireotide) allowed MCC patients to participate given the SSTR expression (NCT01652547). All this sets the stage for a new therapeutic option of theranostics/peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in MCC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data on PRRT in MCC exist only in the form of case reports or series. A search for articles or abstracts pertaining to “PRRT” and “MCC” on PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar was systematically performed. Articles or abstracts published up to January 2022 were retrieved. The references of all relevant studies were evaluated as well. We also contacted centers that had previously reported experience with SSTR imaging or therapy in mMCC patients (the search strategy and PRISMA flow diagram can be found in Supplemental Figs. 1 and 2; supplemental materials are available at http://jnmt.snmjournals.org) (6–26). Overall, 37 patients with mMCC have received PRRT with 177Lu- or 90Y-labeled somatostatin analogs (DOTATATE/DOTATOC) (Table 1; Supplemental Tables 1 and 2). Fifteen and 18 patients received 177Lu-DOTATATE and 90Y-DOTATOC, respectively. Four patients underwent tandem PRRT with 177Lu and 90Y. The number of PRRT cycles ranged from 1 to 5, with the cumulative activity ranging from 1.5 to 30 GBq. Three patients received PRRT in combination with chemotherapy, and 4 patients received PRRT with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Review of Studies Evaluating Treatment Response to PRRT Monotherapy in mMCC (n = 10)

RESULTS

Of the 37 patients who received PRRT, 18 were excluded because response data were unavailable (Supplemental Tables 1 and 2) or because PRRT had been used in combination with other active treatments (Supplemental Table 1). Consequently, radiographic response was available for 19 of 28 patients who received PRRT alone (not in combination with immunotherapy or chemotherapy). Six (31.6%) of 19 patients showed objective responses, from partial to complete, and no severe adverse events were reported (Table 1).

The median overall survival from the start of PRRT was 5 and 8 mo in patients receiving PRRT alone and in combination with other active treatments, respectively (Table 1; Supplemental Table 1). Median overall survival from diagnosis was 22 mo (Supplemental Table 3; methods for statistical analyses are described in the supplemental materials). Few studies addressed the Merkel cell polyomavirus status or 18F-FDG PET findings, whereas most reported the Krenning score (Supplemental Table 4). No significant difference was noted between Krenning scores in terms of objective response to PRRT (P = 0.86).

DISCUSSION

Because of the small sample size, retrospective nature of the studies, selection bias, and low quality of the evidence, we cannot recommend PRRT for mMCC patients. However, the promising results from the available data lay the foundation for clinical trials in this space. Despite approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors, treatment resistance can occur and a fair proportion do not respond. Five of 7 patients who received PRRT in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors or chemotherapy showed partial to complete responses, indicating better objective responses in this category than in the PRRT-alone group. Novel therapies or combinations are needed to further improve patient outcome. The ongoing GoTHAM trial (NCT04261855) is one example of a clinical trial evaluating the immunotherapy avelumab with 177Lu-DOTATATE in patients with mMCC. The results of this and other ongoing trials using theranostics might change the management of mMCC patients soon.

CONCLUSION

Our analysis supports the use of PRRT in mMCC with sufficient SSTR uptake, although the quality of the available evidence is low. Prospective studies in terms of clinical trials are already in development and have started accruing in some parts of the world.

DISCLOSURE

Jonathan Strosberg has consulted for Novartis and is on the speakers’ bureau for Ipsen. Damian Wild reports personal fees from Ipsen. Pashtoon Murtaza Kasi reports having a consultancy or advisory board role with Natera, Foundation Medicine, Merck/MSD Oncology, Tempus, Bayer, Lilly, Delcath Systems, QED Therapeutics, Servier, Taiho Oncology, Exact Sciences, and Ipsen and has received grant or research funding from Advanced Accelerator Applications, Boston Scientific, and Tersera. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

KEY POINTS

QUESTION: Is radioligand therapy with 177Lu-DOTATATE effective and safe in mMCC patients?

PERTINENT FINDINGS: Because of the small sample size and low-quality evidence, we cannot recommend PRRT for mMCC patients; however, the available data show promising results, laying the foundation for clinical trials in this space.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PATIENT CARE: 177Lu-DOTATATE may be effective in some mMCC patients with high SSTR expression.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Soheil Yazdani for the patient data of Hamiditabar et al. (17), Sandip Basu for the patient data of Basu et al. (2), and Riccardo Laudicella and Ludovica Crocè for the patient data of Herberg et al. (15). We also thank Paul Nghiem for useful links for collaboration between centers, Tomoko Akaike for thoughtful comments on the manuscript, Lindsay Gunnell for an MCC skin lesion, and Owen Prall for SSTR-staining slides.

Footnotes

  • Published online Oct. 4, 2022.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Becker JC,
    2. Eigentler T,
    3. Frerich B,
    4. et al
    . S2k guidelines for Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC, neuroendocrine carcinoma of the skin): update 2018. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2019;17:562–576.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Basu S,
    2. Ranade R
    . Favorable response of metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma to targeted 177Lu-DOTATATE therapy: will PRRT evolve to become an important approach in receptor-positive cases? J Nucl Med Technol. 2016;44:85–87.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Moghadam SZ,
    2. Divband G,
    3. Shakeri S,
    4. Aryana K
    . Favorable response after only one cycle of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with 177Lu-DOTATATE in a patient with metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma. Clin Nucl Med. 2019;44:650–652.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Akaike T,
    2. Qazi J,
    3. Anderson A,
    4. et al
    . High somatostatin receptor expression and efficacy of somatostatin analogues in patients with metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma. Br J Dermatol. 2021;184:319–327.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    1. Gardair C,
    2. Samimi M,
    3. Touze A,
    4. et al
    . Somatostatin receptors 2A and 5 are expressed in Merkel cell carcinoma with no association with disease severity. Neuroendocrinology. 2015;101:223–235.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Page MJ,
    2. McKenzie JE,
    3. Bossuyt PM,
    4. et al
    . The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2021;10:89.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.
    1. Meier G,
    2. Waldherr C,
    3. Herrmann R,
    4. Maecke H,
    5. Mueller-Brand J,
    6. Pless M
    . Successful targeted radiotherapy with 90Y-DOTATOC in a patient with Merkel cell carcinoma. Oncology. 2004;66:160–163.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.
    1. Bodei L,
    2. Cremonesi M,
    3. Grana C,
    4. et al
    . Receptor radionuclide therapy with 90Y-[DOTA]0-Tyr3-octreotide (90Y-DOTATOC) in neuroendocrine tumors. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004;31:1038–1046.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. 9.
    1. Bogdanov A,
    2. Licha K
    1. Maecke HR
    . Radiolabeled peptides in nuclear oncology: influence of peptide structure and labeling strategy on pharmacology. In: Bogdanov A, Licha K, eds. Molecular Imaging: An Essential Tool in Preclinical Research, Diagnostic Imaging, and Therapy. Springer; 2005:43–72.
  10. 10.
    1. Imhof A,
    2. Brunner P,
    3. Marincek N,
    4. et al
    . Response, survival, and long-term toxicity after therapy with the radiolabeled somatostatin analogue [90Y-DOTA]-TOC in metastasized neuroendocrine cancers. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:2416–2423.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.
    1. Villard L,
    2. Romer A,
    3. Marincek N,
    4. et al
    . Cohort study of somatostatin-based radiopeptide therapy with [90Y-DOTA]-TOC versus [90Y-DOTA]-TOC plus [177Lu-DOTA]-TOC in neuroendocrine cancers. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:1100–1106.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.
    1. Romer A,
    2. Seiler D,
    3. Marincek N,
    4. et al
    . Somatostatin-based radiopeptide therapy with [177Lu-DOTA]-TOC versus [90Y-DOTA]-TOC in neuroendocrine tumors. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41:214–222.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.
    1. Nilica B
    . Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in non-neuroendocrine tumors: a field report [abstract]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(suppl):S223.
    OpenUrl
  14. 14.
    1. Noorelahi M,
    2. Mahmood R
    . Multiple enlarged lymph nodes in axilla: a case report of Merkel cell carcinoma. Ann Ital Chir. 2017;6:S2239253X17026378.
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
    1. Herberg A,
    2. Murè G,
    3. Militano V,
    4. Lo Gullo R,
    5. Paratore R,
    6. Baldari S
    . 90Y-DOTATOC and/or 111In-pentetreotide in the treatment of the somatostatin expressing tumors (SSTR): personal experience [abstract]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009;36(suppl):S418.
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.
    1. Cirillo F,
    2. Vismarra M,
    3. Cafaro I,
    4. Martinotti M
    . Merkel cell carcinoma: a retrospective study on 48 cases and review of literature. J Oncol. 2012;2012:749030.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Hamiditabar M,
    2. Ali M,
    3. Roys J,
    4. et al
    . Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with 177Lu-octreotate in patients with somatostatin receptor expressing neuroendocrine tumors: six years’ assessment. Clin Nucl Med. 2017;42:436–443.
    OpenUrl
  18. 18.
    1. Schmidt MC,
    2. Uhrhan K,
    3. Markiefka B,
    4. et al
    . 68Ga-DotaTATE PET-CT followed by peptide receptor radiotherapy in combination with capecitabine in two patients with Merkel cell carcinoma. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2012;5:363–366.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. 19.
    1. Salavati A,
    2. Prasad V,
    3. Schneider CP,
    4. Herbst R,
    5. Baum RP
    . Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy of Merkel cell carcinoma using 177lutetium-labeled somatostatin analogs in combination with radiosensitizing chemotherapy: a potential novel treatment based on molecular pathology. Ann Nucl Med. 2012;26:365–369.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.
    1. Kasi PM,
    2. Sharma A,
    3. Jain MK
    . Expanding the indication for novel theranostic 177Lu-dotatate peptide receptor radionuclide therapy: proof-of-concept of PRRT in Merkel cell cancer. Case Rep Oncol. 2019;12:98–103.
    OpenUrl
  21. 21.
    1. Ferdinandus J,
    2. Fendler WP,
    3. Lueckerath K,
    4. et al
    . Response to combined peptide receptor radionuclide therapy and checkpoint immunotherapy with ipilimumab plus nivolumab in metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma. J Nucl Med. 2022;63:396–398.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.
    1. Sindrilaru A,
    2. Aicher A,
    3. Crisan D,
    4. Prasad V
    . Use of the low-dose hyperfractionated 177Lu-HA-DOTATATE peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in patients with immunotherapy-refractory Merkel cell carcinoma: testing of the therapeutic concept in two patients with metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma [abstract]. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2021;19:20–21.
    OpenUrl
  23. 23.
    1. Barucca S,
    2. Berbellini A,
    3. Ancidei C,
    4. et al
    . Radionuclide dosimetry in 90Y-DOTATOC therapy: preliminary report [abstract]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2006;33(suppl):S180.
    OpenUrl
  24. 24.
    1. Stefanova M,
    2. Kratochwil C,
    3. Schwartz L,
    4. Haberkorn U,
    5. Giesel F
    . Impact of normal tissue uptake using 68Ga DOTATOC-PET/CT in patients with neuroendocrine tumor: a follow-up study [abstract]. Insights Imaging. 2012;3(suppl):S160–S161.
    OpenUrl
  25. 25.
    1. Koukouraki S,
    2. Strauss LG,
    3. Georgoulias V,
    4. et al
    . Evaluation of the pharmacokinetics of 68Ga-DOTATOC in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors scheduled for 90Y-DOTATOC therapy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2006;33:460–466.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Epstude M,
    2. Tornquist K,
    3. Riklin C,
    4. et al
    . Comparison of 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT imaging in metastasized Merkel cell carcinoma. Clin Nucl Med. 2013;38:283–284.
    OpenUrl
  • Received for publication September 10, 2022.
  • Revision received September 14, 2022.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology: 51 (1)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
Vol. 51, Issue 1
March 1, 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy in Merkel Cell Carcinoma: A Comprehensive Review
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology web site.
Citation Tools
Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy in Merkel Cell Carcinoma: A Comprehensive Review
Emran Askari, Soroush Zarehparvar Moghadam, Damian Wild, Ebrahim Delpassand, Sergio Baldari, Bernhard Nilica, Philipp E. Hartrampf, Grace Kong, Chiara Maria Grana, Martin Alexander Walter, Francesca Capoccetti, Pashtoon Murtaza Kasi, Jonathan Strosberg
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Mar 2023, 51 (1) 22-25; DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.122.264904

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy in Merkel Cell Carcinoma: A Comprehensive Review
Emran Askari, Soroush Zarehparvar Moghadam, Damian Wild, Ebrahim Delpassand, Sergio Baldari, Bernhard Nilica, Philipp E. Hartrampf, Grace Kong, Chiara Maria Grana, Martin Alexander Walter, Francesca Capoccetti, Pashtoon Murtaza Kasi, Jonathan Strosberg
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Mar 2023, 51 (1) 22-25; DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.122.264904
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • DISCLOSURE
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • SSTR Antagonists as Theranostic Option in Merkel Cell Carcinoma
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Patient Motion During Cardiac PET Imaging
  • Logistics of Adopting 177Lu-Vipivotide Tetraxetan Therapy in a Community-Based Hospital Setting
  • Fitness for Purpose of Text-to-Image Generative Artificial Intelligence Image Creation in Medical Imaging
Show more Brief Communication

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • PRRT
  • SSTR
  • Merkel cell carcinoma
  • theranostics
  • Lu-177
SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire