Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
      • JNMT Supplement
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Watch or Listen to JNMT Podcast
  • Visit SNMMI on Facebook
  • Join SNMMI on LinkedIn
  • Follow SNMMI on Twitter
  • Subscribe to JNMT RSS feeds
Articles

Dose Calibrator Performance and Quality Control

Richard J. Kowalsky, R. Eugene Johnston and Francis H. Chan
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology March 1977, 5 (1) 35-40;
Richard J. Kowalsky
University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. Eugene Johnston
University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Francis H. Chan
University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Two different dose calibrators were studied and their performance measured using the following tests: (A) linearity of response over all activity ranges, (B) accuracy when measuring some commonly used radionuclides, (C) the effect of container configuration on the accuracy of measurement, and (D) daily and long-term stability of the instrument. For each instrument tested, a good linear response was observed for activity measurements below 100 mCi, but there was evidence of nonlinearity at higher activity levels. The accuracy of each instrument was checked using radionuclide standards from two different sources. The measurements indicated a significant difference between standards that was not possible to resolve. Additionally, assessment of accuracy for a dose calibrator with any standard is difficult unless the manufacturer’s calibration procedure is known. The effect of container configuration and photon energy on the accuracy of measuring 99mTc, 131I, and 125I indicated that large correction factors may be necessary when making measurements of 125I. The measurement of a long-lived standard such as radium, cross calibrated for several radionuclide settings, is an effective means for assurring instrument stability and quality control on a daily and long-term basis.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology: 5 (1)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
Vol. 5, Issue 1
March 1, 1977
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Dose Calibrator Performance and Quality Control
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology web site.
Citation Tools
Dose Calibrator Performance and Quality Control
Richard J. Kowalsky, R. Eugene Johnston, Francis H. Chan
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Mar 1977, 5 (1) 35-40;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Dose Calibrator Performance and Quality Control
Richard J. Kowalsky, R. Eugene Johnston, Francis H. Chan
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Mar 1977, 5 (1) 35-40;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Current Status and Future Directions in Nuclear Cardiology
  • The Nuclear Medicine Technology Certification Board: Growing with the Profession to Meet the Needs of the Future
  • The Decline and Fall of the Rectilinear Scanner: Nuclear Medicine Instrumentation 1970–1995
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire