Article Figures & Data
Tables
Criterion Needs improvement (1) Fair (2) Accomplished (3) Exemplary (4) Grade Delivery Holds no eye contact with audience; reads entire report from notes; speaks in low volume; causes audience disengagement Displays minimal eye contact with audience; reads mostly from notes; speaks in uneven volume with little to no inflection Consistently uses direct eye contact with audience but still frequently returns to notes; speaks with satisfactory volume Holds attention of entire audience with direct eye contact; seldom looks at notes; speaks with volume and inflection to maintain audience interest Content and organization Does not have grasp of information and cannot answer questions about topic Provides relatively disorganized presentation; is challenging to follow; can answer only basic questions about selected topic Provides well-organized and well-thought-out presentation; is at ease with providing expected answers to most questions Demonstrates full knowledge by answering questions with explanations; provides clear, organized presentation put together in logical order PowerPoint presentation Is unorganized, with no pictures, graphics, or title slide Is somewhat organized but includes only 1 picture; includes title slide, but it is missing some components, including article link Is organized and has a few pictures and an appropriate title slide that includes article link Is well-written and well-organized; includes pictures or graphics; provides title slide with all necessary components Relevance of article to field Has no relationship to NMT or related physics field Has some relationship to nuclear medicine, molecular imaging, or physics; lacks purpose or understanding; is a nuclear medicine article but not from peer-reviewed journal Relates to NMT or suggested health field and is selected from peer-reviewed journal Provides well-written, detailed explanation of relation to our field; is selected from peer-reviewed journal and covers topic with proficiency
