Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
      • JNMT Supplement
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Watch or Listen to JNMT Podcast
  • Visit SNMMI on Facebook
  • Join SNMMI on LinkedIn
  • Follow SNMMI on Twitter
  • Subscribe to JNMT RSS feeds
Research ArticlePractice Standards

SNMMI Procedure Standard/EANM Guideline for Gated Equilibrium Radionuclide Angiography*

Mary Beth Farrell, James R. Galt, Panagiotis Georgoulias, Saurabh Malhotra, Robert Pagnanelli, Christoph Rischpler and Bital Savir-Baruch
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology June 2020, 48 (2) 126-135; DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.120.246405
Mary Beth Farrell
1Intersocietal Accreditation Commission, Ellicott City, Maryland
CNMT, NCT FASNC FSNMMI-TS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James R. Galt
2Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Panagiotis Georgoulias
3Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece
MD, PhD (Co-chair, EANM)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Saurabh Malhotra
4Division of Cardiology, Cook County Health and Rush Medical College, Chicago, Illinois
FACC FASNC (Chair, SNMMI)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert Pagnanelli
5Department of Radiology, Duke Regional Hospital, Durham, North Carolina
BSRT(R)(N), CNMT, NCT FASNC FSNMMI-TS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christoph Rischpler
6Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany; and
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bital Savir-Baruch
7Department of Radiology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Standard views for ERNA.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    Example showing placement of ROIs and orientation of the ventricles before processing of SPECT ERNA data. (Image courtesy of Ronald G. Schwartz, MD, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY. Images acquired on a cadmium-zinc-telluride (CZT) camera.)

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    Ventricular function data from SPECT ERNA. SPECT ERNA data depicting end-diastolic and end-systolic contours (A), 3-dimensional rendering of LV and RV walls and morphology (B), phase data (C), and volumetric data for both ventricles (left in red and right in blue) (D). (Image courtesy of Ronald G. Schwartz, MD, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY. Images acquired on a cadmium-zinc-telluride (CZT) camera.)

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    Example of a time–activity curve on ERNA.

  • FIGURE 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 5.

    Assessment of LV dyssynchrony by phase analysis of ERNA. LV phase histograms (arrows) on phase analysis of ERNA from 2 patients depicting the timing of myocardial contraction (x-axis in degrees) and the frequency of the pixels achieving contraction at a particular phase (y-axis). Patient A has a normal ejection of 70%, with a uniform phase distribution and narrow phase histogram, depicting lack of dyssynchrony. Patient B has a severely reduced ejection fraction of 30%, with wide phase histogram, highlighting dyssynchronous LV contraction.

  • FIGURE 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 6.

    Correct orientation of the left ventricle in the LAO view. (A) Optimal LAO orientation, with a vertical LV axis (dashed line). Suboptimal LV axis with rightward tilting (B) and leftward tilting (C) of the LV axis.

  • FIGURE 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 7.

    Location of LV and background ROI for calculation of LV function. Blue oval = LV ROI; yellow oval = correct location of background ROI; red oval = incorrect location of background ROI (over the spleen).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Indications for ERNA

    Valvular heart disease
     Timing of surgery
     Assessment of treatment effect
    Cardiomyopathy
     Evaluation of biventricular function
     Determination of type (systolic vs. diastolic) and severity
     Assessment of diastolic dysfunction
     Identification of candidates for defibrillator implantation andresynchronization therapy
     Evaluation of ventricular function before and after transplantation
    Cardio‐oncology
     Monitoring LV function during chemotherapy
     Diagnosis of cardiotoxicity from chemotherapy
     Guiding chemotherapy
    Uncommon indications
     Stable coronary artery disease*
      Diagnosis (rest/stress ERNA)
      Prognosis
      Assessment of treatment efficacy
     Adjunctive evaluations
      Evaluation of RV function
      Determination of ventricular dyssynchrony
    • ↵* Performance of stress ERNA (exercise or dobutamine) in the setting of acute coronary syndromes is not recommended.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Guideline for Serial Monitoring of LVEF by ERNA for Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy with Anthracyclines (9,10)

    Normal LVEF at baseline (≥50%)
      Baseline ERNA before initiating chemotherapy
      Next ERNA at 250–300 mg/m2 dose
      Next ERNA at 450 mg/m2 (400 mg/m2 if high risk*)
      Next ERNA before each dose > 450 mg/m2
     Discontinue therapy if LVEF decreases ≥10% (EF units) from baseline and reaches <50%
    Abnormal LVEF at baseline (>30% to <50%)
      Baseline ERNA before initiating chemotherapy
      Serial ERNA before each subsequent dose
     Discontinue therapy if LVEF decreases ≥ 10% (EF units) from baseline or reaches ≤ 30%
    LVEF ≤ 30% at baseline
     Do not initiate therapy
    • ↵* High-risk features include use of cyclophosphamide, heart disease, mediastinal radiation, and abnormal ECG.

    • View popup
    TABLE 3

    Dosimetry

    99mTc-labeled RBC (17)AdultPediatrics—10 y oldPediatrics—5 y old
     Urinary bladder (organ receiving the largest radiation dose) (mSv per MBq)0.0120.02040.027
     Effective dose (mSv per MBq)0.00470.00770.011
    99mTc-radiolabeled human serum albumin (HSA) (17)
     Heart (organ receiving the largest radiation dose) (mSv per MB)q0.00850.010.021
     Effective dose (mSv per MBq)0.00460.0070.011
    • View popup
    TABLE 4

    Causes of Reduced RBC Labeling Efficiency

    CauseDrug or process
    Oxidation of stannous ionHydralazine
    Heparin
    Methyldopa
    Decreased hematocrit
    Inadequate reduction of 99mTcExcess stannous chloride
    Insufficient stannous chloride
    Formation of RBC antibodiesMethyldopa
    Penicillin
    Quinidine
    Immune disorders
    Leukemia and lymphoma
    Complex formation with 99mTcDextrose
    Decreased RBC labelingPrazosin
    Digoxin
    Propranolol
    Mechanism unknownDoxorubicin
    Iodinated contrast
    • (Adapted from (4)).

    • View popup
    TABLE 5

    List of Clinically Relevant Data to be Included in an ERNA Report (33)

    DataPlanar ERNASPECT ERNA
    Demographic dataStandardStandard
    Study dateStandardStandard
    Medical record numberStandardStandard
    Height/weight/BSAStandardStandard
    Acquisition information
     Type of studyStandardStandard
     Radionuclide and doseStandardStandard
     RBC Labeling techniqueStandardStandard
     Study indicationStandardStandard
     Study qualityRecommendedRecommended
    Study results: rest
     Left ventricle (LV)
      LV size
       QualitativeStandardStandard
       Quantitative (volume)N/AOptional
      LV regional wall motionStandardStandard
      LV hypertrophyOptionalOptional
      Quantitative LVEFStandardStandard
      LV diastolic function
       QualitativeStandardStandard
       Quantitative (PFR)PreferredPreferred
     Right ventricle (RV)
      RV size
       QualitativeStandardStandard
       Quantitative (volume)N/AOptional
      RV regional wall motionStandardStandard
      RVEF
       QualitativeOptionalOptional
       Quantitative*N/AOptional
    Atrial sizesOptionalOptional
    Aorta and pulmonary artery sizeOptionalOptional
    PericardiumOptionalN/A
    Synchrony parametersOptionalOptional
    Study results: stress
     Type of protocol: exercise/interventionStandardStandard
     SymptomsStandardStandard
     Peak BP and HRStandardStandard
     METs or %MPHRStandardStandard
     Left ventricle (LV)**
      LV size: change from rest
       QualitativeStandard—
       QuantitativeN/A—
      Change in LV regional wall motionStandard—
      Quantitative stress LVEFStandard—
     Right ventricle (RV)**
      RV size: change from restStandard—
      Change in RV regional wall motionStandard—
      Qualitative stress RVEFOptional—
    Conclusion
     Normal or abnormalStandardStandard
     Diagnostic significance of rest/stress response**Standard—
     Prognostic significance of rest/stress response**Optional—
     Comparison to prior studiesStandardStandard
     Extracardiac findingsRecommendedRecommended
    • ↵* RVEF can be obtained from SPECT ERNA, though not well validated.

    • ↵** Pharmacologic stress SPECT ERNA can allow for assessment of these parameters, though there is little contemporary data.

    • BSA = body surface area; LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction; RVEF = right ventricular ejection fraction; PFR = peak filling rate; BP = blood pressure; HR = heart rate.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology: 48 (2)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
Vol. 48, Issue 2
June 1, 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
SNMMI Procedure Standard/EANM Guideline for Gated Equilibrium Radionuclide Angiography*
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology web site.
Citation Tools
SNMMI Procedure Standard/EANM Guideline for Gated Equilibrium Radionuclide Angiography*
Mary Beth Farrell, James R. Galt, Panagiotis Georgoulias, Saurabh Malhotra, Robert Pagnanelli, Christoph Rischpler, Bital Savir-Baruch
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Jun 2020, 48 (2) 126-135; DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.120.246405

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
SNMMI Procedure Standard/EANM Guideline for Gated Equilibrium Radionuclide Angiography*
Mary Beth Farrell, James R. Galt, Panagiotis Georgoulias, Saurabh Malhotra, Robert Pagnanelli, Christoph Rischpler, Bital Savir-Baruch
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Jun 2020, 48 (2) 126-135; DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.120.246405
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • PREAMBLE
    • I. PURPOSE
    • II. BACKGROUND
    • III. INDICATIONS
    • IV. PROCEDURE
    • V. IMAGE PROCESSING
    • VI. IMAGE INTERPRETATION
    • VII. IMAGE REPORTING
    • VIII. SOURCES OF ERROR & QUALITY ASSURANCE
    • IX. BIBLIOGRAPHY
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Software Discrepancies in Radionuclide-Derived Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction
  • The SNMMI Procedure Standard/ACNM Practice Guideline for Gastrointestinal Bleeding Scintigraphy 3.0
  • COVID-19 and Its Impact on Nuclear Medicine
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The SNMMI/ACNM Practice Guideline for the Use of Radiopharmaceuticals 5.0
  • The SNMMI Procedure Standard/EANM Practice Guideline for Pediatric Gastric Emptying
  • The SNMMI Procedure Standard/ACNM Practice Guideline for Gastrointestinal Bleeding Scintigraphy 3.0
Show more Practice Standards

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire