Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
      • JNMT Supplement
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
  • SNMMI
    • JNMT
    • JNM
    • SNMMI Journals
    • SNMMI
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Past Issues
    • Continuing Education
    • JNMT Podcast
    • SNMMI Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Subscriptions
    • Subscribers
    • Rates
    • Journal Claims
    • Institutional and Non-member
  • Authors
    • Submit to JNMT
    • Information for Authors
    • Assignment of Copyright
    • AQARA Requirements
  • Info
    • Reviewers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Corporate & Special Sales
  • About
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Contact Information
  • More
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • SNMMI Journals
  • Watch or Listen to JNMT Podcast
  • Visit SNMMI on Facebook
  • Join SNMMI on LinkedIn
  • Follow SNMMI on Twitter
  • Subscribe to JNMT RSS feeds
CorrectionErratum

Erratum

Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology December 2018, 46 (4) 383;
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

The article “Exposure to Technologists from Preparing and Administering Therapeutic 131I: How Frequently Should We Bioassay?” by Kopisch et al. (J Nucl Med Technol. 2011;39:60–62) contained a mathematical error that was addressed in a June 2011 Erratum. However, additional corrections in the article are required based on the mathematical error correction in the “Results” section. The corrected paragraphs appear below:

Results

From these data, one learns that an average air concentration of 2.4E–06 kBq/mL (6.4E–08 μCi/mL) of air can be expected from the handling and administration of a dose of 5.74 GBq (155 mCi) of 131I. The NRC assumption for its derived air concentration calculations is that an average worker inhales approximately 20 L of air per minute. A technologist utilizing a full 10 min of 131I handling for a procedure would inhale about 200 L of air. One could project a total ingestion for the technologist of 0.481 kBq/mL (0.013 μCi) during such a procedure.

Discussion

First paragraph: Table 2 summarizes the number of procedures and the number of participating technologists at each of the study locations. The average number of 131I procedures performed by each technologist in this study was 4. Therefore, the average 131I dose a technologist in this study received in a year was 4 × 0.481 kBq (0.013 μCi), or 19.2 kBq (0.052 μCi), well below the NRC monitoring guideline of 185 kBq (5 μCi) per year. The actual dose would probably be lower because this estimate assumes an average dose activity of 5.74 GBq (155 mCi).

Third paragraph: This small-scale study’s results indicate a typical annual intake that is well below the level that the NRC advises as a trigger level for bioassay monitoring. The study results indicate that one would have to administer close to 2220 GBq (60,000 mCi) of 131I in 1 y to reach the NRC trigger limit for bioassay.

Conclusion

First paragraph: This small study showed an average 131I inhalation intake of 0.481 kBq (0.013 μCi) during administration of 5.74 GBq (155 mCi) of 131I in capsule form. This value allows for a full 10 min to handle, assay, and administer the dose. On the basis of this small-scale study, a technologist would have to administer approximately 185 GBq (5,000 mCi) of 131I every month to trigger the NRC threshold of 10% ALI for 131I. This is the trigger level the NRC recommends for bioassay of occupational workers.

In addition, the last column in Table 1 requires corrections and should read:

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology: 46 (4)
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
Vol. 46, Issue 4
December 1, 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Erratum
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology web site.
Citation Tools
Erratum
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Dec 2018, 46 (4) 383;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Erratum
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology Dec 2018, 46 (4) 383;
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Exposure to Technologists from Preparing and Administering Therapeutic 131I: How Frequently Should We Bioassay?
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Erratum
  • Erratum
  • Erratum
Show more Erratum

Similar Articles

SNMMI

© 2025 SNMMI

Powered by HighWire